The present study aims evaluate the oral health conditions of schoolchildren and its relation to growth, development and well-being. Also, it seeks to evaluate different restorative interventions performed at school premises in primary teeth and its impact on the quality of life.
Schoolchildren, aged 6-8 years old, from the six public schools of a deprived suburban area of Brasília, Brazil will be recruited. In the stage 1 of the study, an epidemiological survey of the oral health status and an anthropometric evaluation of the children will be performed. Potential patient for study's stage 2 will be recruited. Quality of life surveys, patterns of oral hygiene and socio-demographic data will be collected. Children with restorative treatment needs will be included in the study's stage 2. In this second stage, primary molars with deep dentin lesions will be treated according to two techniques for selective excavation of carious dentin: subjective criteria or using an objective criteria (polymer burs). For both groups restorations will be performed using a high-viscosity glass-ionomer. In shallow and medium depth dentin lesions, carious dentin will be excavated using hand instruments only (ART approach) and restored using two materials: a high-viscosity glass-ionomer or a combination of a self-etch adhesive and a bulk fill composite. All children will be followed up (study's stage 3) to assess efficacy of the restorative interventions and impact of the restorative treatment on children's quality of life and development.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
270
Subjective vs Objective criteria (Polymer burs) to perform selective excavation of dentin caries in deep lesions
High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs Bulk fill composite to restore shallow and medium depth dentin lesions using the ART approach
Escolas Públicas do Paranoá / Universidade de Brasília
Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
Success of the restorative procedure
Success of the restorative treatment, not requiring any re-intervention (as endo or extraction). Success will be measured at different time frames.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Survival of the restoration
ART criteria for restoration survival will be used to assess survival of restoration (see Hilgert, 2014)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Quality of life (and change in quality of life)
Quality of life - Brazilian version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (B-ECOHIS) Questionnaires
Time frame: Baseline and 12months after intervention (change in quality of life)
Treatment costs
Initial and follow-up treatment costs to allow cost-effectiveness analysis
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.