This study aims to compare the accuracy of measurement between ultrasonography and Cole formula in predicting uncuffed endotracheal tube diameter.
Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study. Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitor, ECG and pulse-oximeter was set on the subjects in the operation room. The uncuffed endotracheal tube (ETT) diameter predictions were measured firstly using ultrasonography (USG), then with Cole formula. After that, polyvinyl chloride (Mallinckrodt) ETT intubation with Cole diameter measurement was inserted using direct laryngoscopy. If the ETT was too small, use a 0.5 mm bigger ETT than the prediction diameter, if it too big, use a 0.5 mm smaller ETT than the prediction diameter. Reintubation and measurements using both methods were recorded. If bradycardia or desaturation happened, positive pressure ventilation, 100% oxygen, atropine 0,01-0,02 mg/kg, adrenaline 0,01 mg/kg could be given. Data was analyzed using SPSS using Bivariat Chi-square test or Fisher Exact Test (categorical comparative analytical study).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
USG used was SonoSite® M-Turbo Bothell, WA, USA, probe linear (Array HFL 38 frekuensi 6-13 MHz). Internal subglottic diameter equals external diameter of the uncuffed endotracheal tube or trachea diameter, result rounded to the smallest uncuffed endotracheal tube size.
Internal diameter of the uncuffed endotracheal tube equals (age in years/4) + 4mm.
Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
The accuracy proportion of USG and Cole Formula
Whether the USG measurement and Cole Formula measurement accurate or not will be recorded.
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.