This clinical trial studies how well early stem cell transplantation works in treating patients with high-grade myeloid neoplasms that has come back after a period of improvement or does not respond to treatment. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as filgrastim, cladribine, cytarabine and mitoxantrone hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving chemotherapy before a donor peripheral blood cell transplant helps stop the growth of cells in the bone marrow, including normal blood-forming cells (stem cells) and cancer cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. The donated stem cells may also replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells. Early stem cell transplantation may result in more successful treatment for patients with high-grade myeloid neoplasms.
OUTLINE: RE-INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY: Patients receive filgrastim subcutaneously (SC) on days 0-5, mitoxantrone hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes on days 1-3, cladribine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, and cytarabine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5. CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Beginning 14-60 days after re-induction chemotherapy, patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes on days -6 to -2, melphalan IV on days -3 to -2, cyclosporine orally (PO) twice daily (BID) starting on day -3. Sirolimus PO BID starting on day -3 will be given to patients who have matched unrelated donors or mismatched unrelated donors. Patients \>55 years or with significant co-morbidities will only receive melphalan IV on day -2 and will also receive total body irradiation (TBI) on day -1 or day 0. EARLY TRANSPLANT: Patients undergo allogeneic HCT after conditioning regimen on day 0. GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients with matched donors will receive mycophenolate mofetil PO three times daily (TID) on days 0-30, then twice a day (BID) until day 40; and cyclosporine PO BID on days -3 to 96, with a taper until day 150. Patients with matched unrelated donors also receive sirolimus PO BID on days -3 to 150, with a taper until day 180. Patients with mismatched unrelated donors will receive mycophenolate mofetil PO TID on days 0-30, then BID until day 100, with a taper until day 150; cyclosporine PO BID on days -3 to 150, then taper until day 180; and sirolimus BID PO days -3 to 180, then a taper until day 365. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Given IV
Given PO
Given IV
Given SC
Undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Correlative studies
Given IV
Given IV
Given PO
Ancillary studies
Given PO
Undergo TBI
Given IV
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Feasibility of Early Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Assessed by Enrollment and Incidence of Early Transplant
Success will be defined as enrollment of at least 30 patients with transplants occurring in 15 of these 30 (50%) within 60 days of enrollment or start of induction chemotherapy with G-CLAM, whichever is earlier.
Time frame: Up to 60 days after start of chemotherapy
Feasibility of Early Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Assessed by Relapsed-free Survival 6 Months After Transplant
Success will be defined as observing a 40% of higher 6-month relapse-free survival among patients who received early transplant on study.
Time frame: 6 months after early allogeneic HCT on study
Response Assessments After Early Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, Day 28
Complete Remission (CR), defined as \<5% blasts in bone marrow with hematologic recovery (ANC\>1000/ul and platelets \>100,000/ml). CRi, defined as complete remission with insufficient hematologic recovery (ANC\<1000/ul or platelets\<100,000/ul). CRp, defined as complete remission but platelets \<100,000/ul. Minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as any detectable disease by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH or PCR in a patient otherwise fulfilling remission criteria. Morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), defined as \<5% blasts in bone marrow with no hematologic recovery. Relapse, defined as \>5% blasts in bone marrow, flow cytometry, or manual differential; OR treatment for active relapsed disease.
Time frame: Approximately 28 days after early allogeneic HCT
Response Assessments After Early Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, Day 84
Complete Remission (CR), defined as \<5% blasts in bone marrow with hematologic recovery (ANC\>1000/ul and platelets \>100,000/ml). CRi, defined as complete remission with insufficient hematologic recovery (ANC\<1000/ul or platelets\<100,000/ul). CRp, defined as complete remission but platelets \<100,000/ul. Minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as any detectable disease by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH or PCR in a patient otherwise fulfilling remission criteria. Morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), defined as \<5% blasts in bone marrow with no hematologic recovery. Relapse, defined as \>5% blasts in bone marrow, flow cytometry, or manual differential; OR treatment for active relapsed disease.
Time frame: Approximately 84 days after early allogeneic HCT
Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Among Patients Who Received Early Transplant
Relapse-free survival among patients who received early allogeneic HCT on study as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 100 days post-transplant
Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Among Patients Who Received Early Transplant
Relapse-free survival among patients who received early allogeneic HCT on study as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 6 months post-transplant
Event-free Survival (EFS) Among Patients Who Received Early Transplant
Event-free survival among patients who received early allogeneic HCT on study as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Events included death, relapse, and grade 3-4 acute graft vs host disease.
Time frame: Up to 100 days post-transplant
Event-free Survival (EFS) Among Patients Who Received Early Transplant
Event-free survival among patients who received early allogeneic HCT on study as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Events included death, relapse, and grade 3-4 acute graft vs host disease.
Time frame: Up to 6 months post-transplant
Overall Survival (OS) Among Patients Who Received Early Transplant.
Overall survival among patients who received early allogeneic HCT on study as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 100 days post-transplant
Overall Survival (OS) Among Patients Who Received Early Transplant.
Overall survival among patients who received early allogeneic HCT on study as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 6 months post-transplant
Overall Survival (OS) Among Patients Who Did Not Receive Early Transplant
Overall survival among patients who did not receive early allogeneic HCT on study as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 100 days after induction day 1
Overall Survival (OS) Among Patients Who Did Not Receive Early Transplant
Overall survival among patients who did not receive early allogeneic HCT on study as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 6 months after induction day 1
Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Among Patients Who Received Early Transplant
Acute graft versus host disease (graded II, III, or IV) among patients who received early allogeneic HCT on study.
Time frame: At day 100
Treatment Related Mortality Among Patients Who Received Early Transplant vs Patients Who Did Not Receive Early Transplant
Treatment related mortality calculated among patients who received early allogeneic HCT on study vs patients who did not receive early transplant on study.
Time frame: At day 100
Factors That Distinguish Patients Who Received Early Transplant From Those Who Did Not - TREATMENT RELATED MORTALITY
Patients who receive early transplant will be compared to those that don't using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for the quantitative variable of treatment-related mortality (TRM). This outcome measure is intended to report a predicted TRM score assessed at the time of feasibility evaluation. The TRM score is used to measure "treatment-related mortality," or likelihood of death within 28 days of initiation of induction chemotherapy for patients with AML. The score is normalized from 0 to 100, so that a score of 0 demonstrates the patient has a very low likelihood of TRM and a score of 100 a very high likelihood of death. A calculation is used to predict TRM using age, performance status, if they have secondary AML, albumin, creatinine, platelet count, white blood cell count, and peripheral blood blast percentage. The higher the TRM score, the higher the risk of TRM. Calculator and table of relationship between TRM score and TRM probability found here: https://trmcalculator.fredhutch.org/.
Time frame: From time of subject's study enrollment to time of subject's feasibility success assessment (i.e. when subject received transplant within 60 days or when it was determined subject would not proceed with transplant on study)
Factors That Distinguish Patients Who Received Early Transplant From Those Who Did Not - GENDER
Patients who receive early transplant will be compared to those that don't using the Fisher's exact test for the categorical variables of gender.
Time frame: From time of subject's study enrollment to time of subject's feasibility success assessment (i.e. when subject received transplant within 60 days or when it was determined subject would not proceed with transplant on study)
Factors That Distinguish Patients Who Received Early Transplant From Those Who Did Not - AGE
Patients who receive early transplant will be compared to those that don't using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for the quantitative variable of age.
Time frame: From time of subject's study enrollment to time of subject's feasibility success assessment (i.e. when subject received transplant within 60 days or when it was determined subject would not proceed with transplant on study)
Demonstrate the Feasibility of Collecting Patient-reported Outcomes for Trial Participants
The amount of returned patient-reported outcome questionnaires will be summarized for each collection timepoint using percent collection from surviving patients for PRO timepoints.
Time frame: Up to 12 months post-HCT
Demonstrate the Feasibility of Collecting Resource Utilization Data for Trial Participants
The amount of days of hospitalization (the major driver of costs within the first year) will be collected for resource utilization.
Time frame: Within the first year of induction chemotherapy on study
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.