The objective of this registry is to assess and characterize the use and performance of the EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System and the EnSite Precision™ Software V2.0 in a variety of electrophysiological (EP) procedures and clinical settings. This registry will assess the clinical performance of the system in a controlled, real-world environment after commercial release. Up to 500 subjects will be enrolled in up to 50 sites worldwide. Data will be collected at enrollment/baseline, procedure and pre-discharge. There is no long-term follow-up required for this registry. The anticipated registry enrollment is about 6-7 months.
The use of the EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System will be assessed by collecting feedback from physicians/operators through specific questions. The performance of the EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System will be assessed by collecting procedure data and adverse events. A detailed Data Management Plan will be established to ensure consistency of the data. This document will include procedures used for data review, database cleaning, and issuing and resolving data queries. If appropriate, the Data Management Plan may be updated throughout the registry duration. All revisions will be tracked and document controlled. Case Report Form data will be captured in a validated electronic database management system hosted by St. Jude Medical. Centralized monitoring will occur through routine internal data review. This monitoring is designed to identify missing and inconsistent data, data outliers, and potential protocol deviations that may be indicative of site non-compliance. On-site monitoring may occur at the discretion of the sponsor.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
515
Ospedale Cardinal Massaia di Asti
Asti, Italy
Assessment of the EnSite Precision™ Software V2.0 in Terms of Geometry Accuracy
summarizing the count and percentage of patients with accurate geometry
Time frame: during procedure
Mapping Time Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters
mapping time will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate) for the following modules: Manual AutoMap™ TurboMap™
Time frame: during procedure
Mapping Time Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters With Manual Mapping
mapping time will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate) for the following modules: Manual
Time frame: during procedure
Mapping Time Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters With AutoMap Module Mapping
mapping time will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate) for the following modules: AutoMap module
Time frame: during procedure
Mapping Time Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters With TurboMap Module Mapping
mapping time will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate) for the following modules: TurboMap module
Time frame: during procedure
Point Density Associated With (re-)Mapping One or Multiple Arrhythmias in a Single Subject With a Variety of Catheters
mapping points collected and used will be summarized (using mean and standard deviation across arrhythmia types, and for each type of arrhythmia as appropriate)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: during procedure
Assessment of the EnSite Precision™ Software V2.0 in Terms of System Stability
summarizing the count and percentage of patients with overall system stability
Time frame: during procedure
Assessment of the EnSite Precision™ Software V2.0 in Terms of Unrecoverable Shifts
summarizing the count and percentage of patients with unrecoverable shifts
Time frame: during procedure
EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System Assessment
Count and percentage of subjects in whom the mapping system was reported to be excellent, very good, good, poor and N/A
Time frame: during procedure
EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System Assessment
Overall procedure time summarized using mean and standard deviation
Time frame: during procedure
Clinical Utility and Ease of Use of the Automated Radiofrequency Marker Placement
Count and percentage of subjects where the AutoMark feature assisted in identifying gaps in lesion lines
Time frame: during procedure
Clinical Utility and Ease of Use of the Automated Radiofrequency Marker Placement
Count and percentage of subjects where the AutoMark feature was easy to use
Time frame: during procedure