The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster on allodynic symptoms of localized neuropathic pain after knee surgery.
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial comparing 5% lidocaine medicated plaster (5LP) and placebo whether neuropathic pain symptoms (dynamic mechanical allodynia, pressure, hot and cold) have a different chronological improvement with 5LP compared to placebo. Pain intensity and pain relief, sleep and quality of life and osteoarthritis severity are also assessed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
37
The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster on allodynic symptoms of localized neuropathic pain after knee surgery
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial comparing 5% lidocaine medicated plaster (5LP) and placebo whether neuropathic pain symptoms (dynamic mechanical allodynia, pressure, hot and cold) have a different chronological improvement with 5LP compared to placebo. Pain intensity and pain relief, sleep and quality of life and osteoarthritis severity are also assessed.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Time to response to treatment
Time to response to treatment defined as a 30% reduction in dynamic brush-induced mechanical allodynia on the localized pain area during the chronological period extending from inclusion to 3 months
Time frame: from inclusion to 3 months
- Kinetics of evolution over time of pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with brush-induced Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA) in both groups (Placebo and 5LP)
Kinetics of evolution over time of pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with brush-induced Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA) in both groups (Placebo and 5LP)
Time frame: from inclusion to 3 months
- Kinetics of evolution over time of pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) in both groups (Placebo and 5LP)
\- Kinetics of evolution over time of pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) in both groups (Placebo and 5LP)
Time frame: at inclusion
- Kinetics of evolution over time of Cold Detection Threshold (CDT) and Warm Detection Threshold (WDT) in both groups (Placebo and 5LP)
\- Kinetics of evolution over time of Cold Detection Threshold (CDT) and Warm Detection Threshold (WDT) in both groups (Placebo and 5LP)
Time frame: at inclusion
Pain evaluated with numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10
Pain evaluated with numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10
Time frame: at inclusion
Pathophysiology of neuropathic characteristics with DN4 questionnaire
Pathophysiology of neuropathic characteristics with DN4 questionnaire
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: at inclusion
Evolution of the size of the allodynic area
Time frame: at inclusion
- Responder rate, defined as 30% and 50% reduction over time on pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with brush-induced Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA)
\- Responder rate, defined as 30% and 50% reduction over time on pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with brush-induced Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA)
Time frame: at 3 months
- Responder rate, defined as 30% and 50% reduction over time on pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT)
\- Responder rate, defined as 30% and 50% reduction over time on pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT)
Time frame: at 3 months
- Responder rate, defined as 30% and 50% reduction over time on Cold Detection Threshold (CDT) and Warm Detection Threshold (WDT)
\- Responder rate, defined as 30% and 50% reduction over time on Cold Detection Threshold (CDT) and Warm Detection Threshold (WDT)
Time frame: at 3 months
- Comparison of pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with brush-induced Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA) between painful knee and contralateral knee on the same anatomic location.
\- Comparison of pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with brush-induced Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA) between painful knee and contralateral knee on the same anatomic location.
Time frame: at 3 months
- Comparison of pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) between painful knee and contralateral knee on the same anatomic location
\- Comparison of pain evaluated by numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10 with Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) between painful knee and contralateral knee on the same anatomic location
Time frame: at 3 months
- Comparison of Cold Detection Threshold (CDT) and Warm Detection Threshold (WDT) between painful knee and contralateral knee on the same anatomic location.
\- Comparison of Cold Detection Threshold (CDT) and Warm Detection Threshold (WDT) between painful knee and contralateral knee on the same anatomic location.
Time frame: at 3 months
Evolution of sleep by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PGIC) questionnaire.
Evolution of sleep by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PGIC) questionnaire.
Time frame: at 3 months
Evolution of quality of life by Short-Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire.
Evolution of quality of life by Short-Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire.
Time frame: at 3 months
Evolution of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire
Evolution of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire
Time frame: at 3 months