When providing amplification post-implantation to residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear, the lower frequency boundary can be modified to minimize or avoid overlap between the frequencies coded through acoustic hearing and those presented through electrical stimulation. This boundary is termed the cross-over frequency (Fc) and the effect of modifying this parameter will be investigated in this study. To avoid the research being confounded by prior bias for a particular frequency allocation, the study will be conducted with newly implanted recipients. This study will also investigate whether tests which measure the ability to use low frequency hearing and objective measures can predict the preferred Fc and speech performance benefit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
The HEARing CRC
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing (SSQ) scale
Preference rating assessed using SSQ scale
Time frame: Testing at 18, 19, 22 and 25 weeks post-activation of cochlear implant
Word recognition scores in quiet
Open-set monosyllabic word scores in quiet
Time frame: Testing at 12, 15, 18, 19, 22 and 25 weeks post-activation of cochlear implant
Speech recognition in noise
Open-set speech recognition in noise
Time frame: Testing at 12, 15, 18, 19, 22 and 25 weeks post-activation of cochlear implant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.