Objectives: The objective of study was to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of EryDex (Dexamethasone sodium phosphate encapsulated in autologous erythrocytes, using the EryDex System - EDS) at two dose levels (low dose and high dose DSP/infusion), compared to placebo, on Neurological Symptoms in Patients With Ataxia Telangiectasia. Initial Double-Blind Treatment Period (0 to 6 Months) Primary Efficacy Objective: • Evaluate the effect of EryDex at two dose levels (low dose and high dose DSP/infusion), compared to placebo, on central nervous system (CNS) symptoms measured by the change in the Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (mICARS) from baseline to Month 6 (Visit 9) in patients with ataxia telangiectasia (A-T). Secondary Efficacy Objectives: * Evaluate the effect of EryDex, compared to placebo, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) in patients with A-T from baseline to Month 6 (Visit 9). * Evaluate the effect of EryDex, compared to placebo, on measures of Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S; structured) in patients with A-T from baseline to Month 6 (Visit 9) * Evaluate the effect of EryDex, compared to placebo, on measures of Adaptive behavior measures in patients with A-T by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) from baseline to Month 6 (Visit 9). Safety Objectives: • Evaluate the safety and tolerability of two non-overlapping doses of EryDex, compared to placebo, in patients with A-T over the 12-month double-blind study duration. Extension Treatment Period (6-12 Months): Primary Objective: • Evaluate the efficacy of EryDex at two dose levels (low dose and high dose DSP/infusion) compared to placebo, in treating CNS symptoms in A-T patients during longer-term treatment (up to 12 months), as measured by the mICARS. Secondary Objectives: * Evaluate the longer-term (up to 12 months) safety and tolerability of EryDex in A-T patients. * Compare the effects of EryDex on the CGI-C and CGI-S (structured), VABS, and QoL using the EQ-5D-5L scale.
This was an international, multi-center, one-year, randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study. This study was divided into three periods: Screening (Days -30 to -1), 6-month Initial Treatment Period (Months 1-6; Visits 1-9), and 6-month Extension Treatment Period (Months 7-12; Visits 10-15). A total of 175 patients, of the 180 planned, met all selection criteria at baseline, and were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to one of the two EDS-EP dose levels or placebo. These patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the two doses of EDS-EP or placebo, as follows: * Group 1: EDS-EP dose range of \~5-10 mg DSP/infusion (low dose), 59 pts * Group 2: EDS-EP dose range of \~14-22 mg DSP/infusion (high dose), 57 pts * Group 3: Placebo EDS infusion, 59 pts The initial 6-month treatment period was considered complete when the endpoint assessment (at Visit 9/Month 6 or at early discontinuation) was performed for all patients. All patients who completed the assessments over the initial 6 months of the trial were eligible to continue in an additional 6-month, double-blind, placebo- controlled extension, designed to collect information on the longer-term safety and efficacy of the trial treatments. Following completion of the 6-month Initial Treatment Period, patients that met all entry criteria were re-randomized and treated as follows: * Patients originally randomized to one of the two dose levels of EryDex (low dose or high dose; Groups 1 or 2) continued in the same treatment arm. * Patients originally randomized to the Placebo group (Group 3) were re-allocated as defined at the initial randomization in equal proportions (1:1) and received either the EryDex low dose or high dose as follows: * Following 6 months of treatment, one third of the placebo patients were switched to treatment with EryDex, as described above. * After 9 months of treatment, another third of the placebo patients were switched to treatment with EryDex, as described above. * At 12 months, all remaining placebo patients were eligible to switch to open-label treatment with EryDex, as described above.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
176
EDS-EP dose range of \~5-10 mg DSP/infusion
EDS-EP dose range of \~14-22 mg DSP/infusion
EDS processed autologous erythrocytes using a sodium chloride \[NaCl\] solution.
UCLA-Ataxia Center and HD Center of Exellence
Los Angeles, California, United States
The Ataxia-Telangiectasia Clinical Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
UT Health
Houston, Texas, United States
Royal Children's Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Laboratoriumgeneeskunde
Leuven, Belgium
Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin Pädiatrische Allergologie, Pneumologie und Mukoviszidose, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre
Kochi, Kerala, India
Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
...and 12 more locations
Change From Baseline in Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (mICARS)
The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) was an assessment of the degree of impairment in patients with cerebellar ataxia and was administered in its entirety; however, the primary efficacy assessment was based on the modified (m)ICARS, which excluded the Oculomotor domain (items 17 to 19) and items 8 to 12 of the Kinetic Functions domain of the ICARS. The mICARS was a 54 points maximum score (min 0) questionnaire divided into 3 sections: * Posture and Gait Disturbance section-7 items (min score 0, max score 34) * Kinetic Function-2 items (min score 0, max score 12) * Speech Disorder- 2 items (min score 0, max score 8). The assessment was designed to be completed within 30 minutes, and higher scores - both for total and subscores - indicate a higher level of disease impairment. The subscores are added to give the total score.
Time frame: to Month 6 (Visit 9)
Number of Patients With Improving, Stable or Worsening Score Using a Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)
The CGI-C scale assesses the change in the patient's clinical status from baseline using a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change. Clinicians were required to conduct a full clinical interview and examination of the patient. The interview and examination assessed various aspects of the patient's appearance (grooming, evidence of falls, etc.), ataxia, cognition (orientation, calculation ability, language, ability to follow commands, memory, etc.), apraxia, dysarthria, extrapyramidal motor symptoms, activities of daily living, and mood. The higher the score the worse the outcome.
Time frame: to Month 6 (Visit 9)
Number of Patients With None to Severe (0 to 4) Scores in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-Structured of Neurological Symptoms of AT
The CGI-S scale measures global severity of illness at a given point in time, and is usually rated on a 7-point, Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (normal, not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). No version of the CGI-S exists which has been specifically adapted for use in patients with A-T; therefore, a 5-point version was developed that considered the severity of the following symptoms of A-T: ataxia (walking), dysarthria, dysmetria, extrapyramidal symptoms (chorea, myoclonus, dystonia, and tremor), and eye movements. Ratings of none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), and very severe (4) were selected based on the level of symptomatology. The higher the score the worse the outcome.
Time frame: to Visit 9 (Month 6)
Change From Baseline of Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS-II) Scores - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
VABS-II was a questionnaire to assess adaptive behavior. It contained 4 domains each with 2-3 subdomains, every subdomain contained various items (questions): A) communication (receptive, expressive, written) B) daily living skills (personal, domestic, community) C) socialization (interpersonal relationships, play and leisure time, coping skills) D) motor skills (gross motor, fine motor). The expanded version of the VABS consisted of 540 items, 261 of which used in this trial. The possible score for each item was from 0 to 4 based on whether the patient performed the activity "never", "rarely", "sometimes", "often" or "almost always". At the end of each domain section, a total score (the sum of the score for each item) was calculated. Domain A: min score 0, max score 572. Domain B: 0 - 800. Domain C: 0 - 580. Domain D: 0 - 424. A grand total score (A+B+C+D scores) was provided (range:0-2376) The lower the score the higher the disability at each level (domains and subdomains).
Time frame: to Visit 9 (Month 6)
Number of Patients With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) at Month 6
TEAE = Treatment Emergent Adverse Events were any AEs started on or after the day of the first infusion through the day just prior to the day of the Visit 9 ("Month 6") infusion, or \<=60 days after last dose if the subject never continued past this period.
Time frame: to Visit 9 (Month 6)
Number of Patients With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) at Month 12
TEAE = Treatment Emergent Adverse Events were any AEs started on or after the day of the first infusion through the day just prior to the day of the Visit 15 ("Month 12") infusion. Placebo patients who switched to EryDex treatment at 6 and 9 months were not added to the Extension Treatment Period safety data so that the results reported here under are for those patients who remained on placebo from the start of the study till the end of it.
Time frame: to Visit 15 (Month 12)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.