In recent years, a large number of studies have been conducted on how to improve the treatment of patients in the Emergency Room (ER) complaining of chest pains. Great advances have been achieved recently regarding diagnostic methods aided by coronary CT angiopraphy (CCTA) and sensitive troponins. However, various questions about these methods still remain obscure and there is no effective comparison between them in patients with intermediate risk. The aim of the study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of sensitivity troponins in the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain and the intermediate probability of ACS compared with CCTA.
This will be a prospective and unicentric study with approximately 200 subjects recruited over a planned recruitment period of 24 months. Based on an alpha error of 0.05 and using a power of 0.8 for the primary outcomes, investigators calculated the number of individuals necessary for the study to be at least 141. All patients will be submmited to troponin measurements and CCTA. The commercial kit ADVIA Centaur® TnI-Ultra (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA) is used for this in automated equipment of the same brand. It is measured at the central InCor laboratory. The 99th percentile value is 0.04 ng/ml. The CCTA used will be the 320-channel Toshiba Aquilium machine. If the CCTA result shows coronary stenosis greater than or equal to 50%, the patient will initiate the ACS treatment and be hospitalized to have coronary cineangiography. In case the CCTA shows lesions of less than 50%, the patient will be discharged and monitored for 30 days by telephone. This conduct is already followed as a routine in the emergency unit at InCor for both situations. A second sampling of the troponin kit will be obtained from all patients three hours after the first collection in order to evaluate for an increase/decrease of troponin. This second troponin measurement, however, it is blinded to the main investigator, who will only have access to it after the evaluation of outcomes at the end of the study. All the data will be placed in a Microsoft Access database table and analyzed with the SAS Statview 5.0 software. The comparative analysis between the methods will be made using the area under the ROC curve and obtaining sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Cardiac catheterization (for patients with \>50% lesions) or discharge or in patients with intermediate risk.
Instituto do Coração - HMFMUSP
São Paulo, Brazil
Number of participants with adverse events according to phone contact after 30 days
Patients whose CCTAs show lesions with stenosis of less than 50%, compare combined outcomes (death, AMI, rehospitalization, and stroke)with the increase/decrease of troponin in the second measurement in 30 days according to phone contact.
Time frame: 30 days
Compare the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values between the high sensitivity troponin and the CCTA in the detection of an ACS.
ROC curve / ANOVA
Time frame: 30 days
Stablish the cut off for troponin levels
Patients whose CCTAs show coronary lesion with stenosis of more than 50%, compare with lesions with stenosis of more than 70% / acute plaque in the coronary cineangiography. In addition, compare the lesions treated in this group of patients and the increase/decrease of troponin in the second measurement; evaluate the best cut-off point regarding the percentage of variation in the troponin kit between zero and three hours that are related to the presence of lesions with stenosis of more than 70% / acute plaque in the coronary cineangiography.
Time frame: 3 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.