Meta-analyses of the Effect of 'Catalytic' Doses of Fructose and Its Epimers on Carbohydrate Metabolism

Overview

Despite advances in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes, its prevalence continues to rise worldwide. There is a need for new modalities to improve metabolic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes and those who are overweight or obese and at risk for type 2 diabetes. Contrary to the concerns raised about the adverse role of fructose in metabolic health, various lines of evidence suggest that fructose and its epimers may improve the metabolic handling of glucose through inducing glycogen synthesis. Recent small trials in humans suggest that catalytic doses (=\<10g/meal) of fructose and its epimers (allulose, tagatose, and sorbose) may reduce postprandial glycemic responses to carbohydrate loads (i.e., oral glucose tolerance test or a starch load) in people with and without type 2 diabetes. There is also limited evidence that these acute effects may manifest as longer term improvements in glycemic control. There is an urgent need to synthesize the evidence of the effects of fructose and its epimers on postprandial carbohydrate metabolism.

Background: Despite advances in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes, its prevalence continues to rise worldwide. There is a need for new modalities to improve glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes and those who are overweight or obese and at risk for type 2 diabetes. Contrary to the concerns raised about the adverse role of fructose in metabolic health, there may be a role for fructose and its epimers, the rare non caloric sugars allulose (C-3 epimer of fructose), tagatose (C-4 epimer of fructose), and D-sorbose (C-3 and C-4 diastereomer of fructose). All are naturally found in small quantities in dried fruits and maple syrup. Bother allulose and tagatose are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the Food and Drug Administration in the US and are marketed as low-calorie sugar substitutes that have anti-hyperglycemic effects. Various lines of evidence suggest that fructose and its epimers may improve the metabolic handling of glucose through inducing glycogen synthesis. Recent small trials in humans suggest that 'catalytic' doses (=\<10g/meal) of fructose and its epimers (allulose, tagatose, and sorbose) may reduce postprandial glycemic responses to carbohydrate loads (i.e., oral glucose tolerance test or a starch load) in people with and without type 2 diabetes. These acute effects have been shown to be sustainable over the longer term in several controlled trials of fructose and tagatose. Need for a review: There is an urgent need to synthesize the evidence of the effects of fructose and its epimers on acute postprandial carbohydrate metabolism and longterm glycemic control. There remains uncertainty in regards to the minimum effective dose (range studied, 2-25g) and the extent to which these benefits translate into meaningful longterm improvements in glycemic control. A systematic review and meta-analysis remains the "Gold Standard" of evidence to support health claims development. It will map the available evidence and, by pooling the totality of that evidence, provide the most precise estimate of the true effect of fructose and its epimers on carbohydrate metabolism and longterm glycemic control. Objectives: The investigators will conduct two systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effect of small 'catalytic' doses of fructose and its epimers. The objective of the first systematic review and meta-analysis will be to assess their effect on the postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses to other carbohydrates in acute feeding trials, while the objective of the second systematic review and meta-analysis will be to update and expand on our previous systematic review and meta-analysis of small catalytic doses of fructose to assess the effect of small catalytic doses of fructose and its epimers on glycemic control in chronic feeding trials. Design: The planning and conduct of the two proposed systematic reviews and meta-analyses will follow the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The reporting will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched using appropriate search terms. Study selection: The first systematic review and meta-analysis will include single-bolus feeding trials assessing the effect of small 'catalytic doses (=\<10g/meal) of fructose and its epimers on the acute postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses to other carbohydrates. The second systematic review and meta-analysis will include controlled feeding trials of \>=1-week diet duration investigating the effect of small 'catalytic doses (=\<50g/day or =\<10% energy/day) of fructose and its epimers on markers of glycemic control. The 50g/day =\<10% energy/day dose threshold for chronic feeding allows for the intake of fructose and its epimers as part of 3 main meals (=\<10g/meal) and 3 snacks (=\<5g/meal) per day and aligns with current guidelines not to exceed 10% energy from free or added sugars. Data extraction: Two or more investigators will independently extract relevant data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. All disagreements will be resolved by consensus. Mean values and SEs will be extracted for all outcomes. Standard computations and imputations will be used to derive missing data. Outcomes: Acute glycemic outcomes (incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for blood glucose and insulin, Matsuda insulin sensitivity index, and the early insulin secretion index) will be assessed in the first systematic review and meta-analysis while chronic glycemic outcomes (HbA1c, fasting glucose, and fasting insulin) will be assessed in the second systematic review and meta-analysis. Data synthesis: Ratios of means will be pooled for the acute glycemic outcomes and mean differences will be pooled for the chronic glycemic outcomes using the Generic Inverse Variance method with random effects models. Random-effects models will be used even in the absence of statistically significant between-study heterogeneity, as they yield more conservative summary effect estimates in the presence of residual heterogeneity. Fixed-effects models will only be used where there is \<5 included studies. Paired analyses will be applied for crossover trials. Heterogeneity will be tested (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I2 statistic). To explore sources of heterogeneity, the investigators will conduct sensitivity analyses, in which each study is systematically removed. If there are \>=10 studies, then the investigators will also explore sources of heterogeneity by a priori subgroup analyses by participant phenotype, dose, comparator, baseline measurements, risk of bias, study design (parallel, crossover), energy balance (positive, neutral, negative), and duration of follow-up. Metaregression will assess the significance of categorical subgroup analyses and model continuous dose response relationships. Where no evidence of a linear relationship is observed, meta-regression spline curve modeling will be undertaken (the MKSPLINE procedure) to assess a dose threshold by characterizing segments of the dose-response curve where separate linear approximations may best describe the data. If there are more than 10 trial comparisons, then Publication publication bias will be assessed by inspection of funnel plot and the Egger and Begg tests. If publication bias is suspected, then an adjustment for funnel plot asymmetry will be attempted by imputing the missing study data using the Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill method. Evidence Assessment: The strength of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Knowledge translation plan: Results will be disseminated through traditional means such as interactive presentations at local, national, and international scientific meetings and publication in high impact factor journals. Innovative means such as webcasts with e-mail feedback mechanisms will also be used. Knowledge Users will act as knowledge brokers networking among opinion leaders and different adopter groups to increase awareness at each stage. Four Knowledge Users will also participate directly as members of nutrition guidelines committees. Target adopters will include industry and research communities. Feedback will be incorporated and used to guide analyses and improve key messages at each stage. Significance: The proposed project will aid in knowledge translation related to the effects of fructose and its epimers on postprandial carbohydrate metabolism. This project aims to inform future design of single-meal feeding trials on fructose and its epimers by establishing the dose range for their effects on postprandial carbohydrate metabolism.