This is a single center, single arm unblinded prospective study of the safety of pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with unresectable, borderline resectable, or recurrent pancreatic/periampullary cancers who have previously undergone treatment with chemotherapy, surgery, photodynamic therapy, conventionally fractionated radiation treatment, or any combination of these therapies. Primary Objective • To estimate rates of acute (within 3 months of treatment) grade 3 or greater gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity in patients treated with Linac-based SBRT for pancreatic or periampullary cancers who have previously received other treatment. Secondary Objectives * To estimate rates of late (\> 3 months after treatment) grade 2 gastritis, enteritis, fistula, and ulcer, or any other grade 3 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity in patients treated with Linac-based SBRT for pancreatic or periampullary cancers * To estimate rates of local progression, overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and progression-free survival in patients with pancreatic or periampullary cancers treated with fractionated Linac-based SBRT. * To evaluate the ability of Linac-based SBRT to provide pain control in patients with pain related to a pancreatic or periampullary tumor. * To evaluate quality of life in patients undergoing treatment with Linac-based SBRT for pancreatic or periampullary cancers.
Patients will receive 5 fractions of 5 gray (Gy) or 6.6 Gy delivered over a five-day period based on whether or not they have received prior radiation therapy to the pancreatic region. Treatment may be delivered over 2 weeks, provided that the patient receives at least 2 fractions per week. Initial patient positioning will be based on volumetric kV (cone-beam computerized tomography) imaging with shifts to bony anatomy as appropriate. Orthogonal kV/MV or kV/kV projection imaging will be used to verify the location of the fiducials prior to delivery of the first treatment beam. A secondary shift based on the location of fiducials may be utilized, as indicated by the position of the fiducials. For free-breathing treatments, kV fluoroscopic images should be obtained to confirm the anticipated position of these fiducials during the entire respiratory cycle. Active monitoring of treatment delivery accuracy will be accomplished using kV and/or MV projection imaging, either immediately before or during all (or a subset of) treatment fields. Patient-specific dosimetric quality assurance (QA) will be performed as per standard practice in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
36
Indiana University Health Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Indiana University Health Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Acute Toxicity Rates of Grade 3 or Greater Gastrointestinal and Hematologic Toxicities (as Raw Percentage)
Measures include the percentage of patients who experienced the toxicity with a grade of 3 or higher. Only those adverse events that were related to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were considered. Patients were considered at risk for an adverse event if they started SBRT treatment. Toxicities per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0.
Time frame: Up to 90 days after treatment
Late, Treatment-related Toxicity Rates of Gastritis, Enteritis, Fistula, and Ulcer, or Any Other Gastrointestinal Toxicity (as Raw Percentage)
Measures include the percentage of patients who experienced the toxicity with a grade of 2 or higher. Only those adverse events that were related to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were considered. Patients were considered at risk for an adverse event if they started SBRT treatment. Toxicities per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0.
Time frame: 90 or more days after treatment, up to 7 years
Overall Survival
This measure reports the overall survival probability from the Kaplan Meier method. The survival time was calculated from the date of treatment start to the date of death and patients who did not expire were censored at their last date known alive.
Time frame: 1 year after treatment
Progression-Free Survival
This measure represents the progression-free survival at one-year following treatment start. The survival time was calculated from the date of treatment start to the date of progression or death. Patients who did not experience progression were censored at their last known date alive.
Time frame: 1 year after treatment
Metastasis-Free Survival
This represents the metastasis-free survival at one-year following treatment start. The survival time was calculated from the date of treatment start to the date of metastasis or death. Patients who did not experience metastasis or death were censored at their last known date alive.
Time frame: 1 year after treatment
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Score
Measured with the Wong-Baker FACES 0-10 scale where higher scores indicate more pain. Patients self-reported the score before (baseline), during (weeks 1 and 2), and after (1 and 3 months) treatment. Scores collected during treatment (weeks 1 and 2) were averaged to create a composite "during treatment" score. Similarly, scores collected after treatment (months 1 and 3) were averaged to create a composite "after treatment" score.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), Week 1 (during treatment), Week 2 (during treatment), Month 1 (after treatment), and Month 3 (after treatment)
Quality of Life Scores - Global Health Status / Quality of Life
Patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life (QOL)-Q (QLQ-C30 Version 3) questionnaire before treatment, during treatment, and after treatment. The questionnaire includes 30 questions to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. The Global Health Status / Quality of Life composite score was calculated by combining the scores for questions 29 and 30 and calculating Score = {(RS -1) range}×100. Responses for questions 29 and 30 ranged from 1 to 7 with 1 indicating "Very Poor" and 7 indicating "Excellent". Higher scores indicate a better quality of life with a minimum composite score of 0 and a maximum composite score of 100. Scores collected during treatment (weeks 1 and 2) were averaged to create a composite "during treatment" score. Similarly, scores collected after treatment (months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12) were averaged to create a composite "after treatment" score.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 week (during treatment), 2 weeks (during treatment), 1 month (after treatment), 3 months (after treatment), 6 months (after treatment), 9 months (after treatment), and 12 months (after treatment)
Quality of Life Scores - Functional Scales
Patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life (QOL)-Q (QLQ-C30 Version 3) questionnaire before treatment, during treatment, and after treatment. The questionnaire includes 30 questions to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. The Functional scales composite scores were calculated by combining the scores for the relevant questions and calculating Score = {1 - ((RS -1) / range)}×100. The response options for each question were "1-Not at all", "2-A little", "3-Quite a bit", and "4-Very Much". Higher scores indicate a high/healthy level of functioning with a minimum composite score of 0 and a maximum composite score of 100. In each category, scores collected during treatment (weeks 1 and 2) were averaged to create a composite "during treatment" score. Similarly, scores collected after treatment (months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12) were averaged to create a composite "after treatment" score.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 week (during treatment), 2 weeks (during treatment), 1 month (after treatment), 3 months (after treatment), 6 months (after treatment), 9 months (after treatment), and 12 months (after treatment)
Quality of Life Scores - Symptom Scales
Patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life (QOL)-Q (QLQ-C30 Version 3) questionnaire before treatment, during treatment, and after treatment. The questionnaire includes 30 questions to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. The Symptom scales composite scores were calculated by combining the scores for the relevant questions and calculating Score = {(RS -1) range}×100. The response options for each question were "1-Not at all", "2-A little", "3-Quite a bit", and "4-Very Much". Higher scores indicate a high level of symptomatology / problems with a minimum composite score of 0 and a maximum composite score of 100. In each category, scores collected during treatment (weeks 1 and 2) were averaged to create a composite "during treatment" score. Similarly, scores collected after treatment (months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12) were averaged to create a composite "after treatment" score.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 week (during treatment), 2 weeks (during treatment), 1 month (after treatment), 3 months (after treatment), 6 months (after treatment), 9 months (after treatment), and 12 months (after treatment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.