Two-year (2 year) information regarding the performance of the commercially available Actis™ Total Hip System in order to obtain and evaluate the clinical outcomes on a series of cementless primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemi-hip arthroplasty procedures using clinical, radiographic and device and procedure related adverse event assessments.
A minimum of 10 study sites. A prospective, uncontrolled, non-randomized, multicenter study. A total of 255 Subjects to include a minimum of 225 Primary THA Subjects and a Sub-group with a minimum of 30 hemi-hip arthroplasty Subjects will be prospectively enrolled into the study. All Subjects will be seen for a preoperative clinic visit at the time of consent, and evaluated at the time of surgery, 6 weeks (28-70 days), 3 months (71-132 days), minimum 1 year (304-668 days), and minimum 2 years (669-1,763 days) postoperatively.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
266
Total Hip Replacement and Hemi-hip Replacement
Unnamed facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unnamed facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unnamed facility
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Unnamed facility
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Unnamed facility
New York, New York, United States
Unnamed facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unnamed facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unnamed facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unnamed facility
Renton, Washington, United States
Harris Hip Score- THA Subjects Per Protocol at 2 Years
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a standardized tool used to evaluate hip pain, function, and mobility. The HHS is score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A score of less than 70 is considered poor, 70-80 is fair, 80-90 is good, 90-100 is excellent.
Time frame: 2 Years
Harris Hip Score- HHA Subjects Per Protocol at 2 Years
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a standardized tool used to evaluate hip pain, function, and mobility. The HHS is score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A score of less than 70 is considered poor, 70-80 is fair, 80-90 is good, 90-100 is excellent.
Time frame: 2 Years
Harris Hip Score- THA Subjects Per Protocol at 3 Months
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a standardized tool used to evaluate hip pain, function, and mobility. The HHS is score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A score of less than 70 is considered poor, 70-80 is fair, 80-90 is good, 90-100 is excellent.
Time frame: 3 months
Harris Hip Score- HHA Subjects Per Protocol at 3 Months
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a standardized tool used to evaluate hip pain, function, and mobility. The HHS is score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A score of less than 70 is considered poor, 70-80 is fair, 80-90 is good, 90-100 is excellent.
Time frame: 3 months
Harris Hip Score- THA Subjects Per Protocol at 1 Year
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a standardized tool used to evaluate hip pain, function, and mobility. The HHS is score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A score of less than 70 is considered poor, 70-80 is fair, 80-90 is good, 90-100 is excellent.
Time frame: 1 Year
Harris Hip Score- HHA Subjects Per Protocol at 1 Year
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a standardized tool used to evaluate hip pain, function, and mobility. The HHS is score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A score of less than 70 is considered poor, 70-80 is fair, 80-90 is good, 90-100 is excellent.
Time frame: 1 Year
Post-Operative 2-Year Device Survivorship- THA Subjects Safety Population
Device survivorship at 2 years post-operatively is a secondary endpoint in this study. A revision is defined as a revision for any reason and device survival is defined as the lack of revision. A 2-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate of the Actis Hip System in implanted hips is provided.
Time frame: 2 Years
Post-Operative 2-Year Femoral Stem Survivorship- THA Subjects Safety Population
A stem revision is defined as any stem revision for any reason and device survival is defined as the lack of revision. A 2-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate of the Actis Hip System in implanted hips is provided.
Time frame: 2 Years
Acetabular Shell Version at 2-years Postoperatively- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Acetabular cup version is the angle formed between the axis of the implant and the coronal plane of the body. Acetabular version typically ranges between 11.5 and 28.5 degrees.
Time frame: 2 Years
Acetabular Shell Inclination at 2-years Postoperatively- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Acetabular cup inclination is the angle between the longitudinal axis of the patient and a perpendicular line to the major axis of the cup projection. The target acetabular cup inclination is between 30-50 degrees
Time frame: 2 Years
Number of Participants With >4 Degrees Change in Acetabular Cup Inclination Angle at 2 Years Postoperatively - THA Subjects
Number of participants with greater than (\>) 4 degrees change in acetabular cup inclination angle at 2 years postoperatively was reported.
Time frame: 2 Years
Number of Participants With Acetabular Shell Migration >2mm at 2 Years Postoperatively - THA Subjects Per Protocol
Number of participants with acetabular shell migration \>2mm at 2 years postoperatively were reported. Acetabular migration is the superior migration of the implant within the pelvic bone.
Time frame: 2 Years
Acetabular Radiolucent Lines- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Radiolucent lines are seen on x-rays and represent an area that is absent of bone. Radiolucent lines seen adjacent to an implant may suggest a lack on bone ingrowth or possible loosening of the implant. Radiolucent lines greater than 1mm wide were considered reportable for this study.
Time frame: 2 Years
Acetabular Osteolysis- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Osteolysis is seen on x-rays and represent an area where bone has been resorbed by the body in response to small particles of debris that are created as an implant wears over time. Osteolysis greater than 5mm was considered to be reportable for this study.
Time frame: 2 Years
Acetabular Sclerotic Lines- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Acetabular sclerotic lines are seen on x-rays and are radio-dense areas of bone that have remodeled due to loads close to the implant.
Time frame: 2 Years
Acetabular Porous Coating Integrity- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Acetabular Cup Porous Coating Integrity is defined as the presence of one or more beads of the porous coating observed away from the component in the soft tissue adjacent to the device.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Position- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Femoral stem position is categorized as neutral, valgus, or varus. A neutral stem is centered within the femoral canal that runs through the center of the femur's long axis. A valgus femoral stem is positioned slightly towards the medial side of the femoral canal, and a varus femoral stem is positioned slightly towards the lateral side of the femoral canal.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Position- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Femoral stem position is categorized as neutral, valgus, or varus. A neutral stem is centered within the femoral canal that runs through the center of the femur's long axis. A valgus femoral stem is positioned slightly towards the medial side of the femoral canal, and a varus femoral stem is positioned slightly towards the lateral side of the femoral canal.
Time frame: 2 Years
Number of Participants With Femoral Stem Tilt - THA Subjects Per Protocol
Number of participants with femoral stem tilt were reported. Femoral stem tilt is a measurement taken at each post-operative year and compared against baseline images collected at 6-weeks post-operative. The measurement captures changes in the position of the femoral stem over time.
Time frame: 2 Years
Number of Participants With Femoral Stem Tilt- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Number of participants with femoral stem tilt were reported. Femoral stem tilt is a measurement taken at each post-operative year and compared against baseline images collected at 6-weeks post-operative. The measurement captures changes in the position of the femoral stem over time.
Time frame: 2 Years
Number of Participants With Femoral Stem Subsidence- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Femoral stem subsidence is the inferior movement of the stem within the femoral canal. Subsidence greater than 2 mm was considered reportable for this study.
Time frame: 2 Years
Number of Participants With Femoral Stem Subsidence- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Femoral stem subsidence is the inferior movement of the stem within the femoral canal. Subsidence greater than 2 mm was considered reportable for this study.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Heterotopic Ossification- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Heterotopic ossification is the abnormal formation of bone in soft tissues, such as muscles, tendons, or ligaments and can occur around the hip joint, leading to pain, stiffness, and restricted range of motion. It is grade as Class 0 through Class IV, with Class 0 being least impactful and Class IV being most impactful.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Heterotopic Ossification- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Heterotopic ossification is the abnormal formation of bone in soft tissues, such as muscles, tendons, or ligaments and can occur around the hip joint, leading to pain, stiffness, and restricted range of motion. It is grade as Class 0 through Class IV, with Class 0 being least impactful and Class IV being most impactful.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Radiolucent Lines- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Radiolucencies are seen on x-rays and represent an area that is absent of bone. Radiolucent lines seen adjacent to an implant may suggest a lack of bone ingrowth into the implant or possible loosening of the implant.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Radiolucent Lines- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Radiolucencies are seen on x-rays and represent an area that is absent of bone. Radiolucent lines seen adjacent to an implant may suggest a lack of bone ingrowth into the implant or possible loosening of the implant.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Osteolysis- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Osteolysis is seen on x-rays and represent an area where bone has been resorbed by the body in response to small particles of debris that are created as an implant wears over time. Osteolysis greater than 5mm was considered to be reportable for this study.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Osteolysis- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Osteolysis is seen on x-rays and represent an area where bone has been resorbed by the body in response to small particles of debris that are created as an implant wears over time. Osteolysis greater than 5mm was considered to be reportable for this study.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Sclerotic Lines- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Sclerotic lines are seen on x-rays and are radio-dense areas of bone that have remodeled due to loads close to the implant.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Sclerotic Lines- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Sclerotic lines are seen on x-rays and are radio-dense areas of bone that have remodeled due to loads close to the implant.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Porous Coating Integrity- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Acetabular Cup Porous Coating Integrity is defined as the presence of one or more beads of the porous coating observed away from the component in the soft tissue adjacent to the device.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Porous Coating Integrity- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Femoral Stem Porous Coating Integrity is defined as the presence of one or more beads of the porous coating observed away from the component in the soft tissue adjacent to the device.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Calcar Resorption- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Femoral calcar resorption occurs when the bone around the prosthesis is partially shielded from bearing loads and begins to resorb
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Calcar Resorption- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Femoral calcar resorption occurs when the bone around the prosthesis is partially shielded from bearing loads and begins to resorb
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Calcar Fracture- THA Subjects Per Protocol
Near the top of the femur is a region of bone called the calcar femorale that provides strength to the femur when compressive forces are applied. During preparation of the femur to receive the femoral implant there is the possibility of fractures occurring in this region.
Time frame: 2 Years
Femoral Stem Calcar Fracture- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
Near the top of the femur is a region of bone called the calcar femorale that provides strength to the femur when compressive forces are applied. During preparation of the femur to receive the femoral implant there is the possibility of fractures occurring in this region.
Time frame: 2 Years
Perceived Leg Length Discrepancy- THA Subjects Per Protocol
The number of subjects who perceived a Leg Length Discrepancy at Two Years
Time frame: 2 Years
Perceived Leg Length Discrepancy- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
The number of subjects who perceived a Leg Length Discrepancy at Two Years
Time frame: 2 Years
Number of Participants With True Leg Length Discrepancy- THA Subjects Per Protocol
True LLD is defined as a difference of 3 cm or greater as reviewed via postoperative radiographs. The measurement is the distance between the superior-most aspects of the left and right femoral heads
Time frame: 2 Years
Number of Participants With True Leg Length Discrepancy- HHA Subjects Per Protocol
True LLD is defined as a difference of 3 cm or greater as reviewed via postoperative radiographs. The measurement is the distance between the superior-most aspects of the left and right femoral heads
Time frame: 2 Years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.