This study aims to investigate current aftercare activities in Denmark after intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. The hypothesis is that a large number of hospitals offer aftercare, and these interventions are heterogenic and differ between hospitals and regions. This study is an electronic questionnaire survey that aim to describe and map Danish aftercare activities, and future development plans in this field.
Annually, more than 30,000 patients are admitted for treatment at Danish intensive care units (ICUs). These critically ill patients are some of the most vulnerable in the health care system. For years, focus has primarily been on treatment and survival of this patient group. As treatment effectiveness has gradually increased, the overall survival rate is now above 80%. Consequently, the period following ICU discharge has gained increasing focus and follow up interventions in the period after ICU treatment have become more common. These different follow up interventions has given name to the concept of 'aftercare'. Aftercare activities includes both early rehabilitation initiated during the continued hospital admission and also the following rehabilitation after hospital discharge. Complications after intensive care treatment are numerous, including both physical, cognitive and psychological impairments, e.g. depression, muscle weakness, anxiety and social isolation. Together these symptoms are defined as post intensive care syndrome (PICS). While it is clear that a need for aftercare exists, the optimal evidence based activities remains to be determined. The current follow-up activities are established as local initiatives and the methods vary greatly. Examples of present aftercare interventions include use of diaries, follow-up consultations, revisiting the ICU and assessment of quality of life. A recent systematic review examined these different rehabilitation efforts, without finding significant effects of the present interventions, although usage of ICU-diaries had a minor preventive effect on post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD). A Danish meta-analysis from 2015 on follow-up consultations showed similar results. Aftercare is a rapidly developing area and it is necessary to further investigate this important topic. Therefore, the investigators want to describe the current level of aftercare with a new mapping of activities in all Danish ICUs. Hereby, the investigators hope to create a better and up-to-date foundation for further development within Danish aftercare. Furthermore, the investigators wish to research on the clinician-experienced (the participants) attitude towards and limitations for aftercare activities, in order to discuss directions for future development.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
31
Zealand University Hospital
Køge, Denmark
Incidence of ICUs offering early aftercare to patients after discharge from ICU
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Incidence of ICUs offering late aftercare to patients after discharge from hospital
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Size of hospital (number of beds)
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Size of ICU (number of beds)
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Use of protocol or checklist at patient visit
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Use of protocol or checklist at patient visit
The respondent will choose 'yes' or 'no'
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Selection of patients offered aftercare
The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Selection of patients offered aftercare
The respondent will choose from a list of options: All patients, Depending of length of stay, days with mechanical ventilation, or other: the respondent will specify
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Time from ICU-discharge to first contact
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many hours to days until the patient is contacted at the general wards
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Time from hospital discharge to first contact
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How many months from discharge, until the patient is contacted
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Aftercare team members
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Consumption of time
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Aftercare team members
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The personnel participating in the aftercare: Doctor, nurse, occupational therapist, physical therapist, pharmacist, psychologist or other
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Consumption of time
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How much time is spent (in minutes) pr. contact with the patient
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Type of aftercare interventions during general ward stay
The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Type of aftercare interventions after hospital discharge
The respondent will be choosing interventions from a list, and also be able to specify other interventions not present on the list
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Early aftercare: Type of screening tools or other methods used for patient assessment
The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Type of screening tools or other methods used for patient assessment
The respondent will be choosing screening tools and methods from a list, and also be able to specify other screening tools and methods not present on the list
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Contact method
The respondent will choose from a list of options: How the ICU contacts the patient after hospital discharge. By phone, by letter, by mail, by digital inbox
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Late aftercare: Participation of family members
The respondent will choose from a list: Whether the family is invited to participate in the consultation with the patient or not. Yes/No
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Classifications of reasons for not having an aftercare programme at ICUs without an aftercare programme
The respondent will choose from a list of options: Not enough money, resistance from the general wards, not an important subject, and also be able to write their own answer.
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The responsible party for the financing of aftercare
The respondent will choose from a list of options: The ICU itself, the general ward, the region or through funds?
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
The respondent's own assessment of how aftercare will be prioritized at their ICU in one year.
The respondent will choose on a scale: More aftercare? Same level of aftercare? Less aftercare?
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016
Should aftercare be offered?
The respondent will choose on a scale: Totally agree, partially agree, neither agree or disagree, partially disagree, totally disagree
Time frame: From May 15th to September 31st 2016