The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and device performance of the Edwards Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System in patients with clinically significant, symptomatic, tricuspid regurgitation who are at high surgical risk for standard tricuspid repair/replacement.
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and device performance of the Edwards Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System in patients with clinically significant, symptomatic, tricuspid regurgitation who are at high surgical risk for standard tricuspid repair/replacement. The study is a multi-center, international, prospective, single arm, safety study. Enrolled subjects will be assessed for clinical follow-up at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and annually for 3 years post implant procedure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
Treatment with the EW Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System
St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Health Care Research Institute
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec-Universite Laval
Québec, Canada
All-cause Mortality
The primary endpoint for the study will assess the all-cause mortality of the as treated cohort at 30 days compared to a literature derived Performance Goal based on high-risk surgical outcomes for tricuspid repair/replacement. Due to the early termination of the study, the desired statistical power was not attained and thus this comparison analysis was not performed. All-cause mortality is presented below as a number of deaths and percentage of patients only.
Time frame: At 30 days.
Technical Success
Alive, with * Successful access, delivery and removal of the delivery systems, and * Deployment and correct positioning of the intended device, and * No need for additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure
Time frame: Implant Procedure
Device Success
Alive, with * Original intended device in place, and * No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to the device, and * Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) reduction compared to baseline and Tricuspid Valve (TV) gradient ≤ 5 mmHg
Time frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years
Procedural Success
Device Success, and None of the following device or procedure related Serious Adverse Events (SAE): * Life threatening bleeding * Major vascular or cardiac structural complications requiring intervention * Pericardial effusion requiring drainage or surgery (includes tamponade) * Stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis). * Severe heart failure or hypotension requiring Intravenous (IV) inotrope, ultrafiltration or mechanical circulatory support * Prolonged intubation \> 48 hours
Time frame: At 1 month
Clinical Outcomes [Heart Failure Re-Hospitalization Rates]
Re-hospitalization rates for the underlying condition (heart failure)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier
Massy, France
Hōpital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, France
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg - Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, Germany
Charite-Universitätsmedzin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, Germany
Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilian University
Munich, Germany
Hygeia Hospital
Athens, Greece
...and 1 more locations
Time frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Tricuspid Regurgitation Re-Intervention Rates]
Re-intervention rates for the underlying condition (tricuspid regurgitation)
Time frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Changes in Peripheral Edema]
Change in peripheral edema as assessed by subject weight loss (kilograms) compared to baseline
Time frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class]
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class compared to baseline Measure Description: Measure Description: NYHA Classification - The stages of heart failure: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II - Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity. Comfortable only at rest. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest.
Time frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Distance]
Change in 6 minute walk test distance (meters) compared to baseline
Time frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Change in Quality of Life Short Form (SF)-12 Questionnaire]
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the Short Form (SF)-12 questionnaire compared to baseline The SF-12 is a short survey with 12 questions that results in two scales of mental and physical functioning and overall health related quality of life. The SF-12 Score is scaled from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
Time frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Change in Quality of Life Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)]
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the KCCQ questionnaire compared to baseline The KCCQ is a 12-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-sufficiency, social interaction and quality of life. The KCCQ scale is 0-100. An increase in the KCCQ-12 score reflects an improvement in symptoms for the subject. A mean difference over time of 5 points on the KCCQ-12 summary score reflects a clinically significant change in heart failure status.
Time frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years