Chronic non-healing wounds represent a major source of morbidity, disability, and mortality in diabetic patients. Diabetes is the leading cause of non-traumatic limb amputations worldwide. Many patients with ischemic or neuroischemic wounds are not candidate to surgical/endovascular revascularization, owing to anatomical vascular reasons or for the underlying conditions and co-morbidities. Therefore, identification of novel medical treatment strategies to improve wound healing in diabetic patients is a major challenge for clinicians, researchers, and health care systems. Defects in bone marrow (BM)-derive stem and progenitor cells, including EPCs (endothelial progenitor cells), contribute to diabetic complications. Stem cell mobilizing agents have been previously studied as an adjunctive therapy for critical limb ischemia and chronic non-healing wounds in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, as well as for the treatment of diabetic wound infections . Meta-analyses of such studies indicate that stem cell mobilization in these clinical conditions is safe and potentially effective in improving surrogate outcome measures and hard endpoints (such as rates of wound healing and amputation). This study plans to evaluate whether a single injection of Plerixafor improves wound healing in diabetic patients with stage III-IV (neuro)ischemic wounds.
Chronic non-healing wounds represent a major source of morbidity, disability, and mortality in diabetic patients. Diabetes is the leading cause of non-traumatic limb amputations worldwide. Many patients with ischemic or neuroischemic wounds are not candidate to surgical/endovascular revascularization, owing to anatomical vascular reasons or for the underlying conditions and co-morbidities. Therefore, identification of novel medical treatment strategies to improve wound healing in diabetic patients is a major challenge for clinicians, researchers, and health care systems. Defects in bone marrow (BM)-derive stem and progenitor cells, including EPCs, contribute to diabetic complications. Stem cell mobilizing agents have been previously studied as an adjunctive therapy for critical limb ischemia and chronic non-healing wounds in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, as well as for the treatment of diabetic wound infections . Meta-analyses of such studies indicate that stem cell mobilization in these clinical conditions is safe and potentially effective in improving surrogate outcome measures and hard endpoints (such as rates of wound healing and amputation). However, diabetes impairs the response to the most commonly agent used to mobilize stem cells, namely human recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (hrG-CSF). This notion comes from extensive data in animal models, a retrospective case series in patients with hematological disorders, a meta-analysis of studies conducted in patients with cardiovascular disease, and our proof-of-concept prospective study in otherwise healthy outpatients. Vice versa, our data strongly indicate that diabetic patients adequately mobilize stem/progenitor cells (including vascular progenitors, like EPCs) in response to the CXCR4 antagonist Plerixafor. Plerixafor (Mozobil, Sanofi) is clinically available in Europe (including Italy) as a second-line regimen for stem cell mobilization in patients with myeloma or lymphoma scheduled for autotransplantation, only in combination with hrG-CSF, after failure of hrG-CSF alone, to mobilize a sufficient amount of CD34+ stem cells to start apheresis. Preclinical studies in animal models of delayed and diabetic wound healing support the idea that Plerixafor can be effective as an adjunct therapy to accelerate diabetic wound healing. This study plans to evaluate whether a single injection of Plerixafor improves wound healing in diabetic patients with stage III-IV (neuro)ischemic wounds.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
25
Single injection of 0.24 mg/kg Plerixafor
Single injection of an equal volume of NaCl solution
University Hospital of Padova
Padua, Italy
Wound healing rate
Comparison of wound healing rates in the 2 groups, defined as the complete healing of wounds after 6 months from randomization
Time frame: 6 months
Wound size
Comparison of changes in wound size over time (up to 6 months) in the 2 groups.
Time frame: 6 months
Oxygen tension
Comparison of changes in TcO2 (transcutaneous oxygen tension) over time (up to 6 months) in the 2 groups.
Time frame: 6 months
Perfusion
Comparison of changes in ankle/brachial index over time (up to 6 months) in the 2 groups.
Time frame: 6 months
Surgical intervention
Comparison of the rates of surgical intervention (including debridement and amputations) at 6 months in the 2 groups.
Time frame: 6 months
Stem cell mobilization
Comparison of CD34+ cell mobilization (ratio of cell level at 6 hour post-Plerixafor administration and baseline) in patients with good versus poor outcomes
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of adverse events and reactions
Comparison in the incidence of adverse events and reactions in the 2 groups
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.