The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of nasal broadband glasses HFNC (High Flow Nasal Cannula) in the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants admitted in ICU. Nasal HFNC can deliver warmed humidified gas through a nasal interface, greatly improving the safety and efficacy of administering O2. This device generates a continuous positive pressure in the airways, to reduce the work of breathing. The sealing absence of the HFNC at the nasal interface improves patient comfort and avoiding nasal trauma.
Bronchiolitis in infants is a common and potentially serious disease. It corresponds to an acute pulmonary disease and dyspnea usually viral (70 to 80% of Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants less than 1 year). It particularly affects infants under 2 years. The 2001 consensus conference and bronchiolitis 2006 on the management clarified the criteria for hospitalization and simplified therapeutic attitudes. These conferences have highlighted the importance of humidification, the nasopharyngeal desobstruction for less severe forms of oxygen therapy and for others. Recent literature has also shown that the use of noninvasive ventilation type Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) nasal or broadband nasal glasses (HFNC: High Flow Nasal canula) in severe forms possible to reduce the work of breathing of children with severe bronchiolitis and their use in studies "before / after" was accompanied by a significant decrease in the use of invasive ventilation. The HFNC and nasal CPAP can deliver warmed humidified gas through a nasal interface, greatly improving the safety and efficacy of administering O2. These devices generate a continuous positive pressure in the airways, for decreasing the work of breathing. The sealing absence of the HFNC at the nasal interface improves patient comfort and avoiding nasal trauma, sometimes encountered with nasal CPAP interfaces. The HFNC is a simple, effective and safe, commonly used in severe bronchiolitis admitted in ICU (Intensive Care Unit). However instead of this technique is not yet well defined. The investigators assume that the use of HFNC in severe bronchiolitis in first line allows sufficient respiratory improvement to avoid recourse to other technical assistance ventilatory more binding.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
Evaluation of the use of High Flow Nasal Cannula by biological markers, questionary of quality of use of HFNC by the physician, questionary of evaluation of adverse events with HFNC
Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve - CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, France
Fondation LENVAL - Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL
Nice, France
Rate of early success for the number of bronchiolitis who once admitted in the ICU and placed HFNC will not need another support ventilation mode after one hour of treatment (H1)
the number of children who once set HFNC at baseline Hour 0 will not need another breathing assistance technique After 1 hour H1 of treatment
Time frame: after one hour of treatment
Overall success rate
Number of children who will not need another technique while respiratory assistance throughout the ICU stay
Time frame: Comparison between baseline Hour 0 and after 1 hour of treatment
Demographic predictive factors of failure of HFNC
Correlation of demographic data Hour 0 to failure of HFNC
Time frame: At baseline hour 0
Clinical predictive factors of failure of HFNC
Correlation of clinical data Hour 0 to failure of HFNC
Time frame: At baseline hour 0
The child's comfort HFNC
Neonatal pain and discomfort scale " Échelle Douleur Inconfort Nouveau-Né" (EDIN)) Scores comparison to Hour 0, Hour 1, Hour 12 This scale evaluates the prolonged pain and discomfort of the child, an hetero assesor measures by 5 items about face, body, sleep, comfort and relationship. Each item scores from 0 to 5. 0 means no pain or discomfort symptoms and 5 means the maximum symptoms. Global score will be from 0 to 15.
Time frame: comparison to Hour 0, Hour 1, Hour 12
Incidence of adverse events in HFNC
Frequency and types of adverse events throughout the ICU hospitalization period
Time frame: From baseline hour 0 to the end of hospitalization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
33
Effectiveness of HFNC after 1 hour of application
comparaison of clinical data between baseline and 1 Hour of HFNC application.
Time frame: Comparison between baseline Hour 0 and after 1 hour of treatment