This is a Phase III, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study to compare the efficacy and safety of GSK1278863 administered for 52 weeks versus epoetin beta pegol in approximately 286 Japanese ND and 50 PD subjects with renal anemia. The study will consist of three cohorts. Cohort 1 and Cohort 3 will consist of ND subjects (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent \[ESA\] users and ESA non-users) randomized to receive GSK1278863 or epoetin beta pegol in a ratio of 1:1. PD subjects will be enrolled into Cohort 2 and will receive GSK1278863. This study consists of a 4-week screening phase, a 52-week treatment phase (including primary efficacy evaluation period \[Weeks 40 to 52\]), and a 4-week follow-up phase following the treatment phase. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of GSK1278863 to epoetin beta pegol based on mean hemoglobin (Hgb) during the primary efficacy evaluation period in ND subjects. ESA non-users from Cohort 1 will be excluded from the primary efficacy analysis. Study results will be used as pivotal study data for an NDA submitted for GSK1278863 for the treatment of renal anemia in Japan.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
355
7.0 millimeters (mm) round, standard biconvex, white film coated tablets containing 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg of GSK1278863 as active ingredient, to be orally administered once daily.
9.0 mm round, standard biconvex, white film coated tablets containing 6 mg of GSK1278863 as active ingredient, to be orally administered once daily.
An injectable formulation containing 25 micrograms µg, 50 µg, 75 µg, 100 µg, 150 µg, 200 µg, or 250 µg of epoetin beta pegol per syringe (0.3 mL), supplied as a glass syringe prefilled with epoetin beta pegol solution (clear colorless to pale yellow). Epoetin beta pegol will be subcutaneously administered once every 2 or 4 weeks.
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Chiba, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Chiba, Japan
Mean Hemoglobin (Hgb) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in ND Participants
The mean hemoglobin during the primary efficacy evaluation period in ND participants was estimated by a statistical model using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM).
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Number of ND Participants With Mean Hgb in the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52)
ND participants with observed mean Hgb within the target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period were summarized. Responders were defined as the participants with the mean Hgb within target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period.
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Percentage of ND Participants With Mean Hgb in the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52)
The percentage of ND participants with observed mean Hgb within the target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period was summarized. Responders were defined as the participants with the mean Hgb within target range during the primary efficacy evaluation period.
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Change From Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in ND Participants
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in ND participants is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Change From Baseline in Hgb at Week 4 in PD Participants
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb at week 4 in PD participants is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Number of ND Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to \<=-2.0, \>-2.0 and \<=-1.0, \>-1.0 and \<=0, \>0 and \<=1.0, \>1.0 and \<=2.0, \>2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Percentage of ND Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to \<=-2.0, \>-2.0 and \<=-1.0, \>-1.0 and \<=0, \>0 and \<=1.0, \>1.0 and \<=2.0, \>2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Number of PD Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to \<=-2.0, \>-2.0 and \<=-1.0, \>-1.0 and \<=0, \>0 and \<=1.0, \>1.0 and \<=2.0, \>2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Percentage of PD Participants by Hgb Change From Baseline Category at Week 4
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Number of participants by Hgb change from Baseline is categorized to \<=-2.0, \>-2.0 and \<=-1.0, \>-1.0 and \<=0, \>0 and \<=1.0, \>1.0 and \<=2.0, \>2.0 g/dL, then is additionally categorized to within +/- 1.0 g/dL and over +/- 2.0 g/dL. Number of participants have been included in more than one category at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 4
Daprodustat Dose Level by Visit in ND Participants
Daprodustat dose level at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44 and 48
Epoetin Beta Pegol Dose Level by Visit in ND Participants
Dose of epoetin beta pegol at a scheduled visit was converted to dose per 4 weeks when the dose frequency was every 2 weeks. Epoetin beta pegol dose level at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44 and 48
Daprodustat Dose Level by Visit in PD Participants
Daprodustat dose level at each assessment visit for PD participants is presented using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75).
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44 and 48
Duration of Treatment Interruption Due to Hgb >13 g/dL in ND Participants
The duration (in days) of treatment interruption due to Hgb \>13 g/dL per participant was summarized descriptively on participants with a period of treatment interruption due to Hgb \>13 g/dL.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Duration of Treatment Interruption Due to Hgb >13 g/dL in PD Participants
The duration (in days) of treatment interruption due to Hgb \>13 g/dL per participant was summarized descriptively on participants with a period of treatment interruption due to Hgb \>13 g/dL.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Dose Adjustments in ND Participants
Number of dose adjustments in ND participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Dose Adjustments in PD Participants
Number of dose adjustments in PD participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in ND Participants
Hgb values at each assessment visit for ND participants is presented.
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in PD Participants
Hgb values at each assessment visit for PD participants is presented.
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in ND Participants
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb values at each assessment visit in ND participants is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hgb Values at Each Assessment Visit in PD Participants
Baseline Hgb value was the value from the Day 1 visit. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Data for change from Baseline in Hgb values at each assessment visit in PD participants is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Number of ND Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Number of ND participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Percentage of ND participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Number of PD Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Number of PD participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had Hgb Level Within the Target Range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) at Each Assessment Visit
Percentage of PD participants with Hgb level within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) are summarized at each assessment visit.
Time frame: Day 1, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and Week 52
Percentage of Time With Hgb Within the Target Range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in ND Participants
Mean percentage of time with Hgb within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) is summarized during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52).
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Percentage of Time With Hgb Within the Target Range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period (Weeks 40 to 52) in PD Participants
Mean percentage of time with Hgb within the target range (11.0 to 13.0 g/dL) is summarized during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52).
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Time to Reach the Lower Target Hgb Level (11.0 g/dL) in ND Participants
The time (in days) to reach the lower target Hgb level (11.0 g/dL) was summarized using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75) by Kaplan-Meier method. Participants who did not reach the lower Hgb target were considered as censored cases. Participants who were randomized as Hgb \>= 11.0 g/dL were excluded in this summary.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Time to Reach the Lower Target Hgb Level (11.0 g/dL) in PD Participants
The time (in days) to reach the lower target Hgb level (11.0 g/dL) was summarized using 25th percentile (P25), median, and 75th percentile (P75) by Kaplan-Meier method. Participants who did not reach the lower Hgb target were considered as censored cases. Participants who were randomized as Hgb \>= 11.0 g/dL were excluded in this summary.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of Less Than 7.5 g/dL
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb level of less than 7.5 g/dL is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Increase of More Than 2 g/dL Over Any 4 Weeks
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb increase of more than 2 g/dL over any 4 weeks is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Number of ND participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Percentage of ND Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Percentage of ND participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Number of PD participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Percentage of PD Participants Who Had an Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL
Percentage of PD participants who had an Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of Episodes With Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL in ND Participants
Number of episodes with Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL in ND participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of Episodes With Hgb Level of More Than 13.0 g/dL in PD Participants
Number of episodes with Hgb level of more than 13.0 g/dL in PD participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Treatment Period in ND Participants
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron = Total oral iron dose (mg) / (duration in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the treatment period in ND participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Treatment Period in PD Participants
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron = Total oral iron dose (mg) / (duration in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the treatment period in PD participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period in ND Participants
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron dose during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) = Total oral iron dose (mg) during the primary efficacy evaluation period / (duration in the period in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period in ND participants is presented.
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Monthly Average Dose of Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period in PD Participants
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. Monthly average oral iron dose during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) = Total oral iron dose (mg) during the primary efficacy evaluation period / (duration in the period in days / 30.4375 days). Monthly average dose of oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period in PD participants is presented.
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Number of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of ND participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of PD participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Percentage of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of ND participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Percentage of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Treatment Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of PD participants who used oral iron during the treatment period were summarized.
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of ND participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Number of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The number of PD participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Percentage of ND Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of ND participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Percentage of PD Participants Who Used Oral Iron During the Primary Efficacy Evaluation Period
Supplemental iron therapy were received by participants if required during treatment period. Participants who used ferric citrate were counted as oral iron use. The percentage of PD participants who used oral iron during the primary efficacy evaluation period (Weeks 40 to 52) were summarized.
Time frame: Weeks 40 to 52
Change From Baseline in Ferritin in ND Participants
Change from Baseline in Ferritin in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Ferritin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Change From Baseline in Ferritin in PD Participants
Change from Baseline in Ferritin in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Ferritin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) in ND Participants
Percent change from Baseline in TSAT in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100\*(exponential \[mean change on log scale\]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in TSAT is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in TSAT in PD Participants
Percent change from Baseline in TSAT in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100\*(exponential \[mean change on log scale\]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in TSAT is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Hepcidin in ND Participants
Percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100\*(exponential \[mean change on log scale\]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Hepcidin in PD Participants
Percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as 100\*(exponential \[mean change on log scale\]-1). Adjusted geometric mean and 95% confidence interval for percent change from Baseline in Hepcidin is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Change From Baseline in Serum Iron in ND Participants
Change from Baseline in serum iron in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Serum iron is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Change From Baseline in Serum Iron in PD Participants
Change from Baseline in serum iron in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in Serum iron is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Change From Baseline in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) in ND Participants
Change from Baseline in TIBC in ND participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in TIBC is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of treatment, Baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Change From Baseline in TIBC in PD Participants
Change from Baseline in TIBC in PD participants was summarized at each assessment visit. The Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Adjusted mean and 95% confidence interval for change from Baseline in TIBC is presented. For adjusted values, analysis was performed by MMRM with covariates of Baseline, visit and Baseline-by-visit interaction.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) and Weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to 4 Hours (AUC[0-4]) of Daprodustat for All Dose Levels in ND and PD Participants
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of Daprodustat were calculated using non-compartmental method. AUC (0-4) is presented for combined Week 12 and 24. Geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation is presented. NA indicates that the data is not available since geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated for a single participant.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dose at Weeks 12 and 24
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Daprodustat for All Dose Levels in ND and PD Participants
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints. PK parameters of Daprodustat were calculated using non-compartmental method. Cmax is presented for combined Week 12 and 24. Geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation is presented. NA indicates that the data is not available since geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated for a single participant.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dose at Weeks 12 and 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Ehime, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Fukui, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, Japan
...and 46 more locations