Investigators compared tidal volumes for single rescuer ventilation using a modified bag valve mask with an integrated internal handle versus a conventional bag valve mask in a manikin model.
This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study to assess the tidal volume delivered using a standard and modified bag valve mask (BVM) device in a manikin airway model. Data was collected from July 2015 through October 2015 at the San Antonio Military Medical Center. Emergency medicine providers (physicians, physician assistants, residents, nurses, medics) were randomized to device order. Prior to participation each participant filled out a survey indicating their job status, gender, years of medical experience, and experience level with BVM ventilation. Hand grip strength and size (length, width, span) were measured. Each participant was then asked to provide BVM ventilation using the assigned devices at a rate of 10 breaths per minute for 3 minutes for a total of 30 breaths. Tidal volume of each delivered breath was recorded in milliliters. After a 3 minute rest period, testing was repeated with the second device. After ventilation with each device, participants completed an anonymous questionnaire that used a Likert scale to assess perceived qualities of the modified device including ease of use, ability to provide a superior mask seal, willingness to use in an emergency situation, and overall preference between the two devices. Each participant served as his/her own control.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
70
Subjects deliver breaths to manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer manikin model) a modified Ambu Spur II bag valve mask with integrated internal handle
Subjects deliver breaths to manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer manikin model) a conventional Ambu Spur II bag valve mask
San Antonio Military Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Mean Received Tidal Volume
Each participant was asked to provide BVM ventilation using the assigned devices at a rate of 10 breaths per minute for 3 minutes for a total of 30 breaths. Tidal volume of each delivered breath was recorded in milliliters
Time frame: 3 minutes
Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Ease of Use
Likert scale measuring subject's perceived ease of use of the modified BVM device from not at all easy to use (1) to very easy to use (5).
Time frame: Within 10 minutes of study completion
Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Better Seal Formation
Subjects response using a Likert scale (1-5) regarding their perceptions of whether the modified BVM forms a better seal compared to a standard BVM: 1 (much worse seal formation) to 5 (much better seal formation).
Time frame: Within 10 minutes of study completion
Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Willingness to Use in Emergency Situation
Subject reported willingness to use the modified BVM in a real life emergency situation as measured on a Likert scale ranging 1 (not at all willing to use) to 5 (very willing to use).
Time frame: Within 10 minutes of study completion
Number of Participants Who Preferred the Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM)
Each subject provides a binary response as to whether he/she overall prefers using the modified BVM instead of the conventional BVM.
Time frame: Within 10 minutes of study completion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.