Exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) is associated with diverse health effects in nonsmokers. Flight attendants (FA) who worked on commercial aircraft before the ban on tobacco smoking (exposed FAs) had high, long-term levels of occupational exposure to SHS and are a unique population for the study of long-term health effects of chronic exposure to SHS. In previous studies, we have shown that many never-smoking SHS-exposed FAs to have curvilinear flow-volume loops, decreased airflow at mid- and low-lung volumes, and static air trapping (elevated residual volume to total lung capacity ratio \[RV/TLC\]), abnormalities that are not diagnostic of overt Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), but do implicate the presence of an obstructive ventilatory defect, and are consistent with what has been recently described as preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm). The main objective of the study is to determine the effect of a bronchodilator to counter the physiologic abnormalities that are observed in the population of never-smoking SHS-exposed FAs as both proof of concept of the presence of an obstructive lung disease and as a possible therapeutic option to counteract the adverse respiratory effects of chronic exposure to SHS.
The objective of this research plan is to investigate the hypothesis that subclinical airflow limitation and air trapping in never-smoking SHS-exposed individuals with preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) causes reduced exercise capacity . This in turn will adversely affect their symptoms and quality of life. Furthermore, we hypothesize that exercise capacity, symptoms, and quality of life will improve with the use of inhaled bronchodilators. We proposed to investigate the above hypotheses through the following specific aims: Aim 1- Determine whether airflow limitation in never-smoking SHS-exposed individuals with airflow limitation or air trapping is associated with reduced exercise capacity and adverse health and health-related quality of life (HRQL). We propose to measure (1) maximum level of exercise (watts) and maximum oxygen uptake (VO2) in the laboratory setting, (2) level of physical activity during the subjects' routine daily life using an activity monitor, and (3) measure HRQL using survey tools. We propose to then explore associations between these measures and indices of air trapping at rest (RV/TLC) and progressive airflow limitation with exercise (end expiratory lung volume (EELV)and dynamic hyperinflation (DH)). Aim 2: Determine whether relief of airflow limitation using bronchodilators could improve exercise capacity in never-smoking SHS-exposed individuals with airflow limitation or air trapping in a double blind crossover placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. We propose to examine the effect of bronchodilators on airflow limitation and air trapping and their effects in turn on exercise capacity, daily level of physical activity, and HRQL to show a cause-and-effect relationship. In this way, we plan to explore the utility of bronchodilators as a treatment option for the observed reduced exercise capacity.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
107
VA Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Maximum Oxygen Consumption (Max VO2)
Maximum oxygen consumption (Max VO2) as determined by a symptom-limited progressively increasing cycle exercise test to determine the maximum work (watts) and oxygen uptake (VO2) achieved. The protocol consisted of 3-min rest, 1-min unloaded (freewheeling) cycling at 60 rpm, followed by increasing work rate of 20-30 Watts each 2 minutes to a maximum tolerated, and 5-min of recovery. Twelve lead ECGs were monitored continuously and were recorded along with BP every 2 min. Oxyhemoglobin saturation (O2sat) determined by pulse oximetry was recorded continuously.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Airflow Limitation
After 30 minutes period of rest, the subject will perform exercise at increasing work rates corresponding to 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of the maximum oxygen uptake attained in the first exercise with 2 minutes at each stage. Inspiratory capacity will be measured 2 to 3 times at each work rate while recording tidal flow-volume loops to assess for evidence of airflow limitation during exercise. Air flow limitation will be determined by calculating the percent overlap of tidal breathing over expiratory portion of maximum flow.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Dynamic Hyperinflation
After 30 minutes period of rest, the subject will perform exercise at increasing work rates corresponding to 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of the maximum oxygen uptake attained in the first exercise with 2 minutes at each stage. Inspiratory capacity will be measured 2 to 3 times at each work rate while recording tidal flow-volume loops to assess for evidence of airflow limitation during exercise. Dynamic hyperinflation will be measured by changes in examining end-expiratory lung volume at each stage.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in scores on the SF-12® Health Survey Short Form (SF-12)
The SF-12 is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective. The SF-12 consists of a subset of 12 items from the SF-36® Health Survey (SF-36) and measures two composite outcomes assessing mental health composite score (MCS) and physical health composite scores (PCS). The PCS \& MCS are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. The absolute change in item score by group from baseline up to 12 months was used to assess the quality of life/psychosocial impact on the patients with a larger scores indicating a greater degree of change on physical and mental health.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Change in scores on the Airway questionnaire (AQ20)
The AQ20 is given to patients to measure HRQOL related to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) . It contains 20 items, with scores ranging from 0 to 20 - high scores indicate poor HRQOL. The absolute change in item score by group from baseline up to 12 months will be reported
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Change in scores on the International Physical Activity Questionnaires (IPAQ)
The IPAQ measure a participants physical activity by either telephone interview or self-administered methods. IPAQ assesses physical activity undertaken across a comprehensive set of domains including: leisure time physical activity, domestic and gardening (yard) activities, work-related physical activity, and transport-related physical activity. Based on the participant responses, results are categorized into Low, Moderate, or High levels of physical activity. The absolute change in score by group from baseline up to 12 months will be reported
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Change in level of physical activity over time
Real world (outside lab) level of physical activity will be measured using an activity monitor (Actigraph) over a period of a week starting the third week during their treatment. The Actigraph is a monitor that allows collection and analysis of daily activity information about subjects in their normal daily living environment, which records both the number of steps and the time interval during which the steps are taken. The change in score by group from baseline up to 12 months will be reported
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Association between respiratory abnormalities and HRQOL outcomes.
The association between respiratory abnormalities and HRQOL outcomes at 12 months will be determined using pearson/spearman correlation. The aim is to show that at least 8%-10% of the variation in level of physical activity or score on our survey tools are explained by the observed lung function abnormalities and cabin SHS exposure (a correlation coefficient of at least 0.28). Correlation coefficients range from + 1 to -1, with a coefficient of 0=no correlation.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.