IOTA Versus Pattern Recognition Method in Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses

Woman's Health University Hospital, Egypt396 enrolled

Overview

To compare between the efficacy of IOTA simple rules and pattern recognition method in the differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

396

Conditions

Gynecology

Interventions

Transvaginal ultrasonographyDEVICE

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 40 YearsMax age: 70 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Ovarian mass more than 5 cm in size (confirmed by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasonography in gynecology clinic) * The patient is candidate for abdominal exploration for ovarian Cystectomy or oophorectomy. Exclusion Criteria: * Complicated ovarian masses. * Unfit for surgery.

Locations (1)

Kasr el aini hospital

Cairo, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

comparing the sensitivity of the IOTA versus the Pattern recognition in diagnosing the different types of ovarian masses

Time frame: 12 month

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.