The purpose of this study is to identify psychopathology (psychiatric symptoms) that can differentiate between Schizotypal Disorder (SD) and Asperger Syndrome (normal IQ, no language impairment Autism Spectrum Disorder) (AS) in young adults. With our present knowledge, the differentiation between AS and SD can be difficult, as they both present with social difficulties, odd (but not psychotic) behaviour, and a 'feeling of not being as everyone else'. Studies suggest that adults with AS symptoms are either overlooked, or diagnosed within the schizophrenia spectrum in Adult Psychiatry. A 'correct' diagnosis is important, as it is the first step towards the most optimal plan, treatment and rehabilitation for the patient. The only way to diagnose psychiatric illness is the description of present psychopathology. To identify symptoms that can differentiate between the two disorders, we will use semi-structured interviews to explore present psychopathology in young adults with typical symptoms of SD and AS respectively, with special focus on presence of alterations in self-experience. Alterations in self-experience are typical for the schizophrenia spectrum, and are therefore not thought to be equally present in AS and SD. The hypotheses are that the total level of altered experiences is higher in SD, than in AS, and with a different pattern of altered experiences in SD than in AS. If the hypotheses are true, an examination of altered self-experience will be valuable to aid clinical differentiation between the two disorders.
Background: SD is a non-psychotic disorder within the Schizophrenia Spectrum (in ICD-10), and has a prevalence of 3.9 % in adult samples. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a pervasive developmental disorder (including AS), has a prevalence of 1 %. SD is typically diagnosed in young adults, whereas AS typically is diagnosed in childhood. Sometimes however, the AS symptoms first become invalidating in young adulthood, where social demands exceed the individual's capacity. In these cases, patients with symptoms corresponding to AS, might first be diagnosed as young adults. In Adult Psychiatry though, experience with diagnosing ASD is scarce, and studies suggest that adult patients presenting with symptoms corresponding to AS, are either overlooked, or diagnosed within the schizophrenia spectrum. Psychiatric diagnosis: Description of present psychopathology is the only way to diagnose psychiatric illness. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for a relevant treatment and rehabilitation plan for the individual patient, as the diagnosis guides the help and support offered. Further, to properly guide neuro-psychiatric research, high diagnostic accuracy is imperative. This study will refer to the diagnostic criteria defined in ICD-10, when including participants, as ICD-10 is the principal diagnostic system in Denmark. Altered self-experience: Alterations in self-experience are considered highly specific for the schizophrenia spectrum, and are therefore not thought to be present in equal amounts and/or distribution in ASD. If this is true, an examination of anomalous self-experiences would be valuable to aid clinical differentiation between SD and AS. For patients with altered self-experience, the experience of him-/herself as a subject is disturbed. This means that the form and structure (rather than content) of the patients' thoughts and experiences is altered. Aim, objectives and hypotheses: The aim is to do an in depth exploration of differences in present psychopathology (psychiatric symptoms) in young adults with SD and AS. This will elaborate and refine our understanding of SD and AS specifically, and ASD and schizophrenia spectrum disorders in general. The objectives are to; 1. Explore differences in psychopathology between young adults with SD and AS and, 2. Contribute to both the general and the specific (in SD and AS respectively) description of the autism concept. The hypotheses are that; 1. The total level of altered experiences (EASE total score) is higher in SD than in AS and, 2. The pattern of most occurring altered experiences (individual EASE items) is different in AS, compared to SD. Material and methods: The study is observational and comparative in design, and will include 100 participants; 50 diagnosed with SD, and 50 with AS. The included subjects medical history will be revised by two senior psychiatric consultants, ensuring identification of participants with typical symptoms. Further, all included participants will be assessed with three semi-structured psychopathological interviews, general symptom and functional scores and self-reports. Co-ratings: All study interviews will be videotaped, and a subset of the taped SCAN and EASE interviews will be co-rated within the research group. Co-ratings will also routinely be performed amongst psychologists at The Danish Autism Centre, who conducts the ADOS interviews. Statistical analyses: To investigate between group differences, group wise comparisons between SCAN algorithms, ADOS algorithms and EASE outcomes will be applied. Further, secondary correlations across psychopathological domains will be explored, and explorative cross-diagnostic factor analysis will be performed. Ethical considerations: Prior to inclusion a differentiated informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
59
From the medical records, described social and psychiatric history and observed psychiatric symptoms will be summarized and presented to two senior psychiatric consultants. The panels evaluation ensures the identification of subjects with typical symptoms, according to a best estimate clinical consensus. The panel divides the participants into 4 groups: 'participant with symptoms typical of AS', 'participant with symptoms typical of SD', 'participant with inconclusive/non typical symptoms' and 'non eligible participant'.
Included participants are asked for a detailed social and developmental history and interviewed with 3 semi-structured interviews: 1. Schedules for Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN); Covering psychopathology and behaviour associated with the major psychiatric disorders. 2. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), module 4; An assessment to identify symptoms within the autism spectrum. 3. Examination of anomalous self-experience (EASE); A checklist for exploration of experiential anomalies. The Ph.D.-student will obtain social and developmental history and carry out SCAN and EASE interviews. ADOS will be carried out by a consultant psychologist at The Danish Autism Centre.
1.The Autism Quotient (AQ), a 50 question scale, for the assessment of autistic traits, 2. The Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ), a 74 item scale, for the assessment of schizotypal personality, 3. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5), a 5 item scale, for the assessment of subjective psychological well-being.
1\. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), a numeric scale (1 through 100) for assessing social, occupational, and psychological functioning, 2. The Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI-Severity), an assessment of the clinician's global view of the patient's severity of psychopathology on a 7 point scale.
Mental Health Centre Ballerup, Mental Health Services, The Capitol Region, Copenhagen
Ballerup Municipality, Copenhagen, Denmark
The Danish Autism Centre
Herlev, Denmark
Level of altered experiences
Total score, Examination of Anomalous Self Experience (EASE)
Time frame: Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Pattern of most occurring altered experiences
Pattern of individual items, Examination of Anomalous Self Experience (EASE)
Time frame: Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Autism Spectrum symptom load
Total score, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), module 4
Time frame: Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Schizophrenia Spectrum symptom load
Score, Schedules for Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)
Time frame: Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Self-reported Autism Spectrum symptom load
Score, The Autism Quotient (AQ)
Time frame: Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Self-reported Schizotypia symptom load
Score, Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ)
Time frame: Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Self-reported well-being
Score, World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
Time frame: Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.