A Study of Oxidative Pathways in MS Fatigue

Overview

This is a 4-week randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, double-blind, single center trial on effect of N-acetyl cysteine versus placebo on fatigue in patients with progressive MS defined by McDonald criteria. Subjects who enter the treatment phase of study, will be randomly assigned to either N-acetyl cysteine (1250 mg three times a day) or placebo (three times a day) for 4 weeks. There will be 3 in-person study visits (screening, baseline, and week 4) and 2 visits over the phone (week 2, and week 6 which is 2 weeks after completing last study drug dose). Visits will all occur in the morning to maximize consistency of assessments and evaluate main outcomes within 2 hours of morning dose of study medication. Fatigue questionnaires, and research samples will be obtained before neurological examination, or magnetic resonance imaging. Research blood draws will be obtained just after fatigue questionnaire completion. Brain spectroscopy will be obtained less than 2 hours after morning dose of study drug to maximize detection of the biological effect of study medication.

1Background 1.1 Multiple Sclerosis Multiple sclerosis is the most common cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults in the US. It is an inflammatory, demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Patients with MS often experience various types of disabling symptoms such as chronic fatigue or pain. Most patients with an initial relapsing-remitting course develop at some point insidious disability worsening, i.e. secondary progressive MS. In contrast, about 15% of multiple sclerosis patients experience an insidiously progressive course from onset. Primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is thought to have similar physiopathology. As such, strategies for managing symptoms of relapsing patients may not necessarily apply to those with progressive disease; however, most symptomatic treatment trials have been done in relapsing-remitting or mixed populations of patients, neglecting a large fraction of patients with progressive forms of the disease. Investigator is planning to address an important clinical and pathophysiologic issue in this proposed study. 1.2 Fatigue in multiple sclerosis Fatigue as defined by a subjective lack of physical or mental energy perceived by the individual with usual activities is the most common and disabling symptom of multiple sclerosis. Fatigue severity is not correlated with depression or neurological disability. It can impact substantially physical and cognitive activities and thus, negatively affect the quality of life of many patients. There are no medications specifically approved for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Many chronic inflammatory disorders are associated with fatigue and peripheral inflammation is postulated to be an important contributor to fatigue pathogenesis. A spectroscopy study has reported decreased N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratio in several brain regions, thus all pointing at axonal loss as a possible contributing factor . In a cross-sectional relapsing-remitting MS study, fatigued patients had more severe atrophy of the striatum, thalamus and frontal and parietal gyri as compared to non-fatigued patients. As a direct consequence of the unknown pathophysiology, very little pharmacologic intervention is available for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Glutamate, a critical neurotransmitter implicated in excitotoxicity and neurodegeneration, may also play a role in fatigue genesis. Two studies of a glutamate receptor antagonist (memantine) have reported worsening of fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients. In addition, Investigator have found that compared to placebo, riluzole (a medication with some anti-glutamate activity) worsened fatigue in patients with very early multiple sclerosis. This is in sharp contrast with the pathological evidence suggesting that excessive glutamate transmission may be a final effector in neuronal and axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis animal models. Oxidative stress due to disequilibrium between oxidants and antioxidants in the central nervous system may also be a major contributor to neurodegeneration . It is unknown if oxidative stress plays a role in the pathogenesis of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. 1.3 Fatigue rating scales Most of the fatigue scales used in multiple sclerosis studies were primarily developed and validated for use in other medical conditions. The two widely used self-completed scales in multiple sclerosis research are the Fatigue Severity Scale, and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. 1.3a. Fatigue Severity Scale: This scale was originally designed to identify the common features of fatigue in multiple sclerosis, and lupus patients. It assesses the impact of fatigue on several outcomes, with an emphasis on physical fatigue. It is composed of 9 questions with responses provided on a 7-point Likert scale. Scale score is the mean of the item scores and higher scores indicate more severe fatigue. 1.3b.Modified Fatigue Impact Scale: This scale has been proposed by the Multiple Sclerosis Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines as the instrument of choice for assessing fatigue in multiple sclerosis. It is derived from the 40-item Fatigue Impact Scale. It has 21 items and assesses more dimensions of fatigue than the Fatigue Severity Scale: physical (9 items), cognitive (10 items) and psychosocial (2 items). The scale score is the sum of the 21 items and higher score indicates more severe fatigue. The scale has shown good reproducibility, ease of use and good correlation with fatigue severity scale scores. A cut-off value of 38 distinguishes fatigued from non-fatigued multiple sclerosis patients. 2.Rationale 2.1 Effect of N-acetyl cysteine in MS fatigue N-acetyl cysteine is an orally bioavailable precursor of the amino acid cysteine and is used to treat acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. The medication half-life in adults is about 5.6 hours. As such it has been given twice or three times a day in various trials that have documented a biological effect. It protects the liver by restoring hepatic concentrations of cysteine and glutathione (GSH- a major intracellular antioxidant). Besides antioxidant properties, N-acetyl cysteine, by increasing the intracellular concentration of cysteine and activating the glutamate-cysteine antiporter eventually decreases glutamatergic transmission. Hypothetically, by decreasing excitotoxicity, it may protect neurons in different models of neuronal damage and neurodegeneration. Excellent safety profile and potential neuroprotective properties make N-acetyl cysteine an attractive target for examining its anti-fatigue properties in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis. Orally administered N-acetyl cysteine produces biologically relevant cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of N-acetyl cysteine at doses that are well tolerated. One study showed an effect of a single injection of N-acetyl cysteine on blood glutathione redox ratios followed by changes in glutathione concentration in the brain using 7T magnetic resonance spectroscopy in 3 patients with Parkinson's disease and 3 controls. Clinical trials of oral N-acetyl cysteine for a wide variety of clinical conditions have used a range of different daily doses (from 600 mg to 6000 mg per day). The study investigator chose the daily dose of 3750 mg (1250 mg administered three times a day), based on its good tolerability, treatment compliance and minimum adverse effects reported in a recent clinical trial. 2.2 Reason for using a placebo group There are no FDA-approved treatments for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. There are also no standard of care as various trials have reported inconsistent findings about the effect of amantadine in multiple sclerosis fatigue. Pursuant to the Helsinki Declaration, when standard treatment of a disease exists, placebo should generally not be used in clinical trials. However, Declaration of Helsinki supports the stance that placebo can be acceptable in the setting where no proven standard therapy exists: The benefits, risks, burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested against those of the best current proven intervention, except in the following circumstances: * The use of placebo, or no treatment, is acceptable in studies where no current proven intervention exists; or * Where for compelling and scientifically sound methodological reasons the use of placebo is necessary to determine the efficacy or safety of an intervention and the patients who receive placebo or no treatment will not be subject to any risk of serious or irreversible harm. 2.3 Gap in fatigue management Symptomatic treatment trials for fatigue have been small, underpowered and with methodological flaws. As such, drawing firm conclusions and making therapeutic recommendations has been difficult. Thus, fatigue in multiple sclerosis remains very difficult to manage despite its substantial impact on patients' life. An issue when studying fatigue in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis has been the possibility of increased fatigue during disease relapses and with specific disease-modifying therapies such as interferon. There has been no study focusing on the effects of drug therapy in fatigue in patients with progressive disease. Furthermore, study investigator's knowledge regarding the underlying pathophysiology of fatigue in multiple sclerosis is scarce and future studies of intervention on fatigue should include biomarkers to further elucidate the potential mechanisms of observed effects. The study investigator hypothesize that fatigue in progressive multiple sclerosis patients is associated with increased glutamate and decreased glutathione concentration on brain spectroscopy at baseline. The study investigator also hypothesize that fatigue is associated with changes of various oxidative pathway metabolites in peripheral blood. 4\. Study Design 4.1 Overview of study design: This is a 4-week randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, double-blind, single center trial on effect of N-acetyl cysteine versus placebo on fatigue in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis defined by McDonald criteria. Subjects, who enter the treatment phase of study, will be randomly assigned to either N-acetyl cysteine (1250mg 3 times a day or placebo ( three times a day)for 4 weeks.There will be 3 in-person study visits (screening, baseline, and week 4 and 2 visits over the phone (week 2, and week 6 which is 2 weeks after completing last study drug dose). Visits will all occur in the morning to maximize consistency of assessments and evaluate main outcomes within 2hours of morning dose of study medication. Questionnaires, and research samples will be obtained before neurological exam or magnetic resonance imaging. Research blood draws will be obtained just after questionnaire completion. Brain spectroscopy will be obtained less than 2hours after morning dose of study drug to maximize detection of the biological effect of study medication. 4.2 Enrollment sites Enrollment will start in August, 2016. Enrollment period will last 6 months. Patients will be enrolled in the trial at University of California San Francisco. 4.3 Study visits 4.3a Screening period: Total duration of screening period is 4 weeks. An additional 5 patients with progressive multiple sclerosis who volunteered for participation in the clinical trial, but had a screening modified fatigue impact scale score of \<38 or were recruited from site's clinic (who reported no fatigue and their fatigue scale score was \<38), will undergo brain imaging on 7Tesla magnetic resonance imaging machine, and research blood draws. 4.3b Treatment period: Total duration of the blinded treatment period is 4 weeks. After the screening visit, the inclusion/ exclusion criteria details of eligible patients will be reviewed by study investigator. The eligible study participants will be randomized in approximately a 2:1 ratio to one of the two arms of either N-acetyl cysteine or placebo. The treatment group assignment will be blinded for the duration of the study. A week-2 phone visit will be completed to determine the tolerance of study drug. 4.3c Follow up phone visit: Two weeks after taking the last dose of study medication, fatigue scale questionnaires are completed over phone by the study coordinator to collect the safety and efficacy measures of the study. Additional phone visit needs to be completed 2 weeks from randomization to assess the safety, tolerability, and compliance of study medication. 4.5 Study visit window: The screening period can be up to 4 weeks. The baseline visits needs to be completed within 28 days of screening visit. Week 2 phone visit in +/- 5 days of Day 14, and week 4visit in Day 28+/-7 days of baseline. Follow-up phone call is completed +/- 5 days of week 6 visit.