The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare landmark-subclavian venous access to ultrasound-guided axillary venous access when performed by pediatric anesthesiologists.
Objective: Subclavian vein catheterization may cause various complications. The investigators will compare the real-time ultrasound-guided axillary venous access vs. the landmark method- subclavian venous access in pediatric paticipants. (the needle insertion point of ultrasound-guided axillary venous is axillary vein. and the needle insertion point of landmark method is infraclavicular subclavian vein) Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Operating room of a tertiary medical center. Interventions: The investigators will compare the ultrasound-guided axillary vein cannulation (66 paticipants) vs. the landmark method (66 pa- ticipants).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
132
Jin-Tae Kim
Seoul, South Korea
2nd access success rate
Time frame: interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds
1st access success rate
Time frame: interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds
3rd access success rate
Time frame: interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds
total time
Time frame: interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.