The GASPAR trial is a pragmatic, parallel-arms, single-center, non-blinded, superiority randomized control trial in neurorehabilitation. The main objective is to test whether a 4 weeks gait rehabilitation program that uses augmented reality is superior to a conventional treadmill training program of equivalent intensity. Baseline assessments precede allocation, which consists in blocking randomization (2:1 ratio) with stratification according to the disease etiology. Post-intervention assessments serve to compare the short-term efficacy of the intervention between the two groups. Three months after discharge, follow-up assessments take place to detect potential long-term effects.
After a lesion to the central nervous system, many patients suffer from a diminished walking capability. During the first rehabilitation phase, specific cares help the recovery of motor function to offer the best chances of returning to normal walk. For example, the repeated practice of walking exercises facilitates the gain of muscular strength and stimulates motor relearning. However, in patients, who have finished the first rehabilitation phase, it is often observed strong limping, unsteady gait, and a bad management of obstacle clearance. Thus, these individuals fall frequently, with risk of severe injury. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of gait training on a treadmill equipped with an augmented reality system. Shapes are displayed onto the treadmill belt with a projector (beamer): the patient adapts his/her gait to the drawing that unfolds in front of him/her. It is possible to train gait symmetry for coordination enhancement or to exercise obstacle clearance and gait agility. Another advantage of this type of treadmill is the capability to continuously analyze gait with integrated sensors and, hence, to give real-time feedback to the patient. Whereas the method seems promising, thorough studies that would confirm its efficacy are lacking. Therefore, the investigators seek to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare visually-guided gait training with a more classical training method. During four weeks, participants will train, according to their abilities, three to five times a week during 30 minutes on the augmented-reality treadmill. A group of control patients will train at comparable intensity but without the visual guidance of gait. Using the data collected during the training sessions, the investigators will study whether the evolution of locomotor function differs between both groups. Furthermore, several questionnaires will be filled in by the participants to document the self-evaluation of their progress. In the long term, the investigators expect to first improve the efficacy of gait rehabilitation and second to better understand the recovery process of locomotor function during the first months after a stroke.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
70
20 sessions (30 min. duration) over 4 weeks of gait training with augmented reality.
20 sessions (30 min. duration) over 4 weeks of gait training without augmented reality.
Clinique Romande de Réadaptation
Sion, Valais, Switzerland
RECRUITINGChange in walking speed
Walking speed, measured with the 2-minute walk test
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 5)
Change in postural control
Capabilities to ensure an optimal postural control. Measured with the Berg Balance test
Time frame: Pre-intervention (week 0), Post-intervention (week 5)
Fear of falling during the hospitalization
Subjective assessment of the fear of falling. Measured with the adapted Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
Time frame: week 5
Fear of falling at home
Subjective assessment of the fear of falling. Measured with the adapted Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
Time frame: after discharge at 3-4 month
Quality of life at home
Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36)
Time frame: after discharge at 3-4 month
Perception of the intervention
purpose-designed questionnaire that will ask to the participant about their perception of the intervention. The questionnaire will evaluate the satisfaction with intensity, duration and difficulty of the intervention. Other questions will ask about the perceived training effects on walking speed and confidence.
Time frame: During the intervention, week 2 and 4
Changes in stride and step lengths
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Changes in stride and step durations
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in step width
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in left/right asymmetry of step lengths
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in left/right asymmetry of step durations
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Changes in stance and swing phases
Measured with the embedded sensors of the treadmills
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
Change in gait variability
Stride-to-stride variability of gait parameters (outcomes 7-12)
Time frame: In every gait training sessions, from week 1 to week 4
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.