The closed-loop delivery system is composed of an insulin pump, a continuous glucose sensor and a dosing algorithm that calculates the insulin dose to infuse based on sensor readings. Pramlintide is a drug and an analog of amylin, a hormone that is co-secreted with insulin in healthy individuals, and is deficient in people with type 1 diabetes. Co-injection of pramlintide with insulin at meal times improves glucose control in type 1 diabetes. Literature data suggests that regular insulin may better match the effect of pramlintide compared to rapid insulin in regulating post-prandial glucose levels. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 3 strategies to control your day-and-night glucose levels: 1. rapid insulin-alone closed-loop delivery; 2. rapid insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery; 3. regular insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery. The primary hypotheses are: 1. During closed-loop control, the simultaneous basal-bolus infusion of pramlintide and fast-acting insulin improves glucose control compared to fast-acting insulin-alone infusion. 2. During closed-loop control, the simultaneous basal-bolus infusion of pramlintide and regular insulin improves glucose control compared to fast-acting insulin-alone infusion.
The closed-loop delivery system is composed of an insulin pump, a continuous glucose sensor and a dosing algorithm that calculates the insulin dose to infuse based on sensor readings. Pramlintide is a drug and an analog of amylin, a hormone that is co-secreted with insulin in healthy individuals, and is deficient in people with type 1 diabetes. Co-injection of pramlintide with insulin at meal times improves glucose control in type 1 diabetes. Literature data suggests that the pharmacodynamics of regular insulin may better match the effect of pramlintide compared to the pharmacodynamics of fast-acting insulin. Moreover, the cost of regular insulin is significantly lower than fast-acting insulin. Therefore, if a similar (or better) glucose profile can be achieved with regular insulin-plus-pramlintide compared to fast-acting insulin-plus-pramlintide, then a co-formulation employing regular insulin should be prioritized. Therefore, in this protocol, we aim to assess the effect of the simultaneous, closed-loop, basal-bolus infusion of pramlintide with insulin at a fixed ratio in controlling glucose levels. In the first experimental arm, we propose to infuse pramlintide with fast-acting insulin. In the second experimental arm, pramlintide will be infused with regular insulin. The control arm will be fast-acting insulin-alone closed-loop system. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of the simultaneous, closed-loop, basal-bolus infusion of pramlintide with fast-acting insulin at a fixed ratio and pramlintide with regular insulin at a fixed ratio in controlling glucose levels compared to fast-acting insulin-alone closed-loop infusion. The investigators aim to conduct a randomized, three-way, crossover trial to compare the efficacy of 1) fast-acting insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery, 2) regular insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery, and 3) fast-acting insulin-alone closed-loop delivery in regulating glucose levels over a period of 24 hours in a study on adults in inpatient settings. Insulin (fast-acting and regular) and pramlintide are given with fixed ratio (6 µg of pramlintide for each unit of insulin). Before each 24-hour intervention visit, the participant's insulin therapy (basal rates and insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios) will be optimized for a minimum of 10 days, with a target of 14 days. There will be a wash-out period of 0 to 42 days between the three intervention arms (termination of 24-hr intervention and start of next optimization period). The primary hypotheses are: 1. During closed-loop control, the simultaneous basal-bolus infusion of pramlintide and fast-acting insulin improves glucose control compared to fast-acting insulin-alone infusion. 2. During closed-loop control, the simultaneous basal-bolus infusion of pramlintide and regular insulin improves glucose control compared to fast-acting insulin-alone infusion.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
28
Subjects will be admitted at the research facility at 7:30. A cannula will be inserted into an arm or a hand vein for blood sampling purposes. Each 24-hour intervention visit includes 3 standardized meals (8:00, 12:00, and 17:00), an evening snack (21:00) and an overnight stay. The glucose level as measured by the real time sensor will be entered manually into the computer every 10 minutes. The insulin and pramlintide pumps' infusion rates will then be changed manually based on the computer generated recommendation, while still maintaining the ratio. The computer generated recommendations are based on a predictive algorithm.
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Percentage of time of plasma glucose levels spent in target range. Target range is defined to be between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L of fast-acting insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery vs. fast-acting insulin-alone closed-loop delivery.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Percentage of time of plasma glucose levels spent in target range. Target range is defined to be between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L of regular insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery vs. fast-acting insulin-alone closed-loop delivery.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Percentage of time of plasma glucose levels spent in target range, comparing fast-acting insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery vs. regular insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Percentage of time (8:00-8:00) of plasma glucose levels spent: a. 3.9-7.8 mmol/L; b. 3.9-10 mmol/L; c. <3.9 mmol/L; d. <3.3 mmol/L; e. <2.8 mmol/L; f. >7.8 mmol/L; g. >10 mmol/L; h. >13.9 mmol/L; i. >16.7 mmol/L
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Percentage of overnight time (23:00-8:00) of plasma glucose levels: a. 3.9-7.8 mmol/L; b. 3.9-10 mmol/L; c. <3.9 mmol/L; d. <3.3 mmol/L; e. <2.8 mmol/L; f. >7.8 mmol/L; g. >10 mmol/L; h. >13.9 mmol/L; i. >16.7 mmol/L
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Standard deviation of glucose levels as a measure of glucose variability.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Total insulin delivery.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Total pramlintide delivery.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Mean plasma glucose level during: a. the overall study period; b. overnight period.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Mean plasma insulin concentration.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Mean plasma glucagon concentration.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Mean plasma amylin concentration.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Number of subjects experiencing hypoglycemia requiring oral treatment during: a. the overall study period; b. the night.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
Gastrointestinal symptoms during the treatment optimization (i.e., the minimum 10 days prior to the 24-hour closed-loop visits) and during the 24-hour closed-loop visits.
Time frame: Up to 24 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.