Gingival recession (GR) is frequently associated with deterioration in dental esthetics and dental hypersensitivity. Outcomes from recent systematic reviews have demonstrated that when the root is covered and the gain in the width of keratinized tissue (KT) is expected, the use of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs) associated with coronally advanced flaps (CAF) appears to be more predictable, and may be considered the gold standard procedure. However, the SCTGs may increase patients' morbidity (e.g., pain). This occurs because of the need for a donor surgical area, which may increase the risk of surgical complications like bleeding, as well as increases post-operative discomfort and the period of the surgical procedure. Another biomaterial, a new collagen matrix (CM) has been used as a substitute for the SCTG. The use of CM was associated with a significant reduction in post-operative morbidity, less post-operative pain and discomfort in the patient, and more esthetic satisfaction.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
15
The test group will be treated by means of the association of Collagen Matrix + Coronally Advanced Flap. As treatment, the control group will receive the association of a subepithelial Conjunctive Tissue Graft + Coronally Advanced Flap. The aim of both procedures will be to obtain root coverage. All these procedures will be performed in a standardized manner.
A new collagen membrane
Connective tissue graft
University of São Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil
Percentage of root coverage (RC)
The primary clinical outcome will be percentage of root coverage (RC) at 12 months
Time frame: 12-months
Reductions in recession depth (RRD)
Measured from the cementum-enamel junction (CEJ) up to the highest point of the gingival margin
Time frame: At the baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months
Complete root coverage of the gingival recessions (CRC)
Time frame: At the baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months
Recession width (RW) at the cemento-enamel junction
Time frame: At the baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months
Relative clinical attachment level (RCAL)
Measured from a fixed point (stent) prepared on the acrylic guide up to the base of the gingival sulcus.
Time frame: At the baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months
Probing depth (PD)
Calculated as RCAL- PD;
Time frame: At the baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months
keratinized tissue width (KT)
From the free gingival margin to the mucogingival junction.
Time frame: At the baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months
Gain in thickness of gingival tissue (GT)
With an injection needle and a silicon marker, 2mm below the gingival margin.
Time frame: At the baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.