The purpose of this observational, retrospective database study of patients with uterine fibroids is to compare the durability of symptom relief after uterus-conserving treatments for symptomatic fibroids in terms of incidence of, and time to, new or recurrent symptoms and subsequent procedures and evaluate the effect stakeholder participation had on the research process.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
12,234
Myomectomy as part of routine clinical care
Endometrial ablation as part of routine clinical care
Uterine artery embolization as part of routine clinical care
Number of uterine fibroids patients who experience new or recurrent symptoms after uterus-conserving treatments (myomectomy, endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-guided focused ultrasound ablation)
Time frame: Minimum of two years after index procedure
Time to new or recurrent symptoms after uterus-conserving treatments (myomectomy, endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-guided focused ultrasound ablation)
Time frame: Minimum of two years after index procedure
Number of uterine fibroids patients who experience a subsequent procedure after uterus-conserving treatments (myomectomy, endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-guided focused ultrasound ablation)
Time frame: Minimum of two years after index procedure
Time to a subsequent procedure after uterus-conserving treatments (myomectomy, endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-guided focused ultrasound ablation)
Time frame: Minimum of two years
Effect of stakeholder participation in the research process
Time frame: From first stakeholder conference (April 2014) to final stakeholder conference (November 2015)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation as part of routine clinical care