A randomised, double blind, parallel group, multicentre study yo compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of SAIT101 versus MabThera® versus Rituxan® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, efficacy, tolerability, and immunogenicity of SAIT101 (biosimilar rituximab) versus MabThera® versus Rituxan® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study will take place globally across approximately 75 study centers in order to randomize approximately 282 patients. The study consists of Part A from baseline for PK and efficacy analysis, followed by Part B from Week 24 to 52 for safety follow-up in which collects transition data.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
294
1,000 mg i.v. of SAIT101 on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of SAIT101 on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.
1,000 mg i.v. of MabThera® on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of MabThera® on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.
1,000 mg i.v. of Rituxan® on Day 1 and 15. 1,000 mg i.v. of Rituxan® on week 24 and 26 for eligible patients.
Area Under the Concentration Time Cure From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (immediately predose on Day 1) to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). Geometric means by treatment (Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set).
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-∞)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area Under the Plasma Concentration from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ (infinity). Calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation and extrapolated to infinity by addition of the last quantifiable concentration divided by the elimination rate constant: AUC(0-last) + C(last)/λz.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-D15)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area Under the Concentration verses time from time 0 to Day 15 prior to infusion (AUC0-D15) calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation. Actual time/concentration on Day 15 was used for the calculation of this parameter unless the parameter was derived by interpolation.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Day 15 Infusion
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) after Day 15 infusion (Dose 2)
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1 and 2 (Pre-dose 2). Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) Before the Second Infusion on Day 15
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Research Site
El Cajon, California, United States
Research Site
La Mesa, California, United States
Research Site
Lakewood, California, United States
Research Site-1
Los Angeles, California, United States
Research Site-2
Los Angeles, California, United States
Research Site
San Leandro, California, United States
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
...and 65 more locations
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Trough concentration (Ctrough) before the second infusion on Day 15 (Dose 2). Trough (pre-dose) concentration prior to second infusion on Day 15 obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1 and 2 (Pre-dose 2). Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24
Disease Activity Score 28 C-reactive protein score (DAS28-CRP) at Week 24 (Full Analysis Set). CRP samples were collected at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16 and 24. DAS28-CRP was calculated using the following equation: \[0.56\*Square Root (SQRT) (tender 28 joint count)+0.28\*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.36\*ln(CRP+1)\]\*1.10+1.15. Total DAS28-CRP scores were calculates and range from 2.0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). Lower scores represent a better patient outcome. Disease remission is considered achieved if the score is between 0 and \<2.6. Low disease activity corresponds to 2.6 to \<3.2. Moderate activity is between 3.2 \& ≤5.1, while high activity is above 5.1.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Week 2 to Week 24 (AUC(w2-24)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration time curve week 2 to week 24 (AUC(w2-24) calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Day 0 to Week 12 (AUC(0-w12))
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Area under the concentration time curve Day 0 to Week 12 calculated by linear up/log down trapezoidal summation.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Dose 1)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Maximum plasma concentration over the first dosing interval obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) (Dose 2)
Time of maximum concentration postinfusion over the second dosing interval, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Apparent Terminal Rate Constant (λz)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Apparent terminal rate constant (λz) determined by linear regression of the terminal points of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Best fit method followed by visual assessment was used to identify the terminal linear phase of the concentration-time profile. A minimum of 3 data points was used for determination.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Systemic Clearance (CL)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Systemic clearance (CL) over the first dosing period calculated as dose (first + second dose) divided by AUC(0-∞).
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Volume of Distribution (VD)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Volume of distribution (VD) over the first dosing period calculated as dose (first + second dose) divided by \[λz AUC(0-∞)\]
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Terminal Half-life (T1/2)
Pharmacokinetic endpoint: Terminal half-life determined as ln2/λz.
Time frame: Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were taken at Baseline and Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Unscheduled visit samples were taken at the discretion of the investigator.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Weeks 8, 16, 36 and 52
Disease Activity Score 28-C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) samples taken at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. DAS28-CRP was calculated using the following equation: \[0.56\*Square Root (SQRT) (tender 28 joint count)+0.28\*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.36\*ln(CRP+1)\]\*1.10+1.15. Total DAS28-CRP scores are presented and range from 2.0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). Lower scores represent a better patient outcome. Disease remission is considered achieved if the score is between 0 and \<2.6. Low disease activity corresponds to 2.6 to \<3.2. Moderate activity is between 3.2 \& ≤5.1, while high activity is above 5.1.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
American Collage of Rheumatology 20% Response Criteria (ACR20) Response Rates at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
American Collage of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response criteria (ACR20) response rates were assessed at Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. An ACR20 response is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
American Collage of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria (ACR50) Response Rates and American Collage of Rheumatology 70% Response Criteria (ACR70) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Efficacy endpoint: American Collage of Rheumatology 50% response criteria (ACR50) response rates and American Collage of Rheumatology 70% response criteria (ACR70) at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52. An ACR50 response is defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). An ACR70 response is defined as both improvement of 70% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analogue pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) and Tender Joint Count (TJC) (the 66/68 Joint Count System)
Efficacy endpoint: Individual components of the ACR improvement criteria on Day 1 and at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) (the 66/68 joint count system). SJC and TJC assess the level of skeletal disease involvement. The 66/68 Joint Count evaluates 66 joints for swelling and 68 joints for tenderness.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
Efficacy endpoint: Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Physicians global assessment of disease activity (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]). Where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = maximum disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Assessment of Pain (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
Participants assessment of pain (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]). Participants assessment of pain (assessed on 1 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) where 0 = no pain and 100 = severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Global Assessment of Disease Activity (Assessed on 1 to 100 mm VAS)
Efficacy endpoint: Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants global assessment of disease activity (assessed on 1 to 100 mm visual analogue scale \[VAS\]). Patients rate how their Rheumatoid Arthritis has affected them, where 0 = very well and 100 = very poor.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: Participants Assessment of Disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI])
the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) contains 20 questions split into 8 categories (dressing \& grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip \& activities). Scores were: 0 = Without ANY Difficulty; 1 = With SOME Difficulty; 2 = With MUCH Difficulty; 3 = UNABLE to Do. Total scores were calculated as the summed category scores divided by the number of categories. Total HAQ-DI scores are presented which range from 0 to 3. Higher scores represent a worse outcome. Scores of 0 to 1 represent mild to moderate difficulty, 1 to 2 moderate disability, and 2 to 3 severe to very severe disability.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Individual Components of the ACR Improvement Criteria on Day 1 and at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52: C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level
C-reactive protein (CRP) level (Mg/L). CRP is a marker for inflammation. a normal reading is \<3 Mg/L. Higher values indicate disease related inflammation and increased cardiovascular risk. CRP levels between 3 Mg/L and 10 Mg/L are mildly elevated. Levels between 10 Mg/L and 100 Mg/L are moderately elevated and CRP levels above 100 Mg/L are severely elevated.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Change From Baseline DAS28-erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Disease Activity Score 28- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) consisted of tender joint counts (TJC), swollen joint counts (SJC) \& erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The formula is: \[0.56\*SQRT(tender 28 joint count)+0.28\*SQRT(swollen 28 joint count)+0.7\*ln(ESR)\]+0.014\*patient global health assessment. Total DAS28-ESR scores are presented. Total scores range from 2 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). A lower score represents a better patient outcome. A DAS28-ESR of greater than 5.1 implies active disease, less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remission.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Number of Participants With a Major Clinical Response (Continuous ACR70) for at Least 24 Weeks
Efficacy endpoint: number of participants with a major clinical response defined as a continuous ACR70 from Baseline (Day 1) for at least 24 weeks. ACR70 is a measure based on American College of Rheumatology criteria of at least a 70% improvement in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in at least 3 of the following: the patient's global assessment of disease status; the patient's assessment of pain; the patient's assessment of function measured using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire the physician's global assessment of disease status; serum C-reactive protein levels.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Number of Participants With a Clinical Remission Response (CRR) at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Number if Participants with a Clinical Remission Response (CRR) defined by the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) \<3.3 at weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Proportion of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 8, 16, 24 36 and 52
Efficacy endpoint: Proportion of participants with European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response (defined as good response, moderate response or no response) at weeks 8, 16, 24 36 and 52 (EOS). EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response was classified using the individual amount of change in the DAS28-CRP score. The DAS28-CRP was classified into 3 categories: low disease activity (\<= 3.2), moderate disease activity (\> 3.2 and \<= 5.1) and high disease activity (\> 5.1). Good response was defined as \>1.2 improvement in the DAS28-CRP from baseline with low disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)
Pharmacodynamic Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM and IgA Levels)
Change from baseline (Day 1) in immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels (mg/dL) at Week 8, 16, 24 36 and 52 (End of study)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 52 (EOS)