Islet transplantation is a relatively new procedure used in people with difficult to control Type 1 diabetes. Insulin producing cells (islets) are isolated from a pancreas of a deceased organ donor. After the cells are carefully prepared, the islets are transplanted into patient's body. These transplanted islets may produce insulin for the patient. Patient may be able to reduce or eliminate the need for insulin injections for an unknown period of time. Patients who receive an islet transplant may need to stay on powerful immunosuppressive drugs for as long as the islets remain alive and working. These drugs help to prevent the immune system from attacking the transplanted islets. Under current standard of care procedure, islets are transplanted into patient's liver. The investigators have learned that some of these cells do not survive the current procedure and are lost around the time of transplant. Therefore in this study, the investigators are studying a new transplant procedure that may help prevent this islet cell loss. The new procedure involves transplanting the islets into an omental pouch instead of into the liver. The omentum is a large apron-like fold of membrane inside the abdomen that drapes over the intestines. This study will test to see if omental islet transplantation is safe and effective. Standard immunosuppressive medicines (anti-thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, sirolimus, etanercept) will be used in this study to prevent rejection of the islets. This study is a collaborative research with the University of Miami, and the same study protocol has been in use over there. Recruitment in Edmonton will continue until all subjects \[N=6\] needed for the study are transplanted. All subjects in this study will receive islet transplants using the study procedure.
BACKGROUND Current islet transplantation into the portal vein of the liver has shown the unique ability of islets to stabilize blood glucose levels and prevent severe hypoglycemia in a selected group of subjects with type 1 diabetes. The main limitations of islet transplantation are the need for systemic immunosuppression to maintain function and the loss of islet function over time. Additionally, many studies have demonstrated that the current site of transplantation in the liver is not an ideal site due to several factors. These factors include (1) significant liver inflammation following islet infusion; (2) potential for life-threatening procedure-related complications such as bleeding and thrombosis; (3) high levels of immunosuppressive drugs and GI toxins in the liver contributing to islet toxicity; (4) the inability to retrieve islets after infusion; and (5) development of graft dysfunction in a number of recipients of intrahepatic allogeneic and autologous islets. Based on these premises, development of a clinical protocol for the implantation of islets into the omentum is a desirable goal. As an attempt to maximize the engraftment of islet cell clusters onto the omentum, implantation site should promote islet adherence to the omental peritoneal layer and avoid cell pelleting. Dr. Alejandro's team at University of Miami has recently performed a series of experiments in animal models of diabetes to assess the feasibility of transplanting pancreatic islets in the omentum using a plasma-thrombin gel. With that approach, the islets are re-suspended in either donor or autologous plasma and distributed in the omental pouch (created by sutures) to avoid pelleting. Cell adherence is achieved by addition of clinical-grade recombinant human thrombin that reacts with plasma to create a biocompatible, degradable gel containing the islet graft. The investigators have outlined the initial patient trial as 6 subjects, based on clinical judgment and extensive experience in clinical islet transplantation trials. If initial safety and efficacy is satisfactory (no adverse events related to the transplantation and efficacy in 2 of the 3 first transplanted subjects), the investigators will transplant 3 additional subjects. OBJECTIVES Primary Objective Safety: To demonstrate the safety of islet transplantation into an omental pouch site for the treatment of subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Secondary Objective Efficacy: To demonstrate the efficacy of islet transplantation into an omental pouch site for the treatment of T1D in subjects with hypoglycemia unawareness and a history of severe hypoglycemic episodes. Primary Endpoints The primary safety endpoint is to demonstrate patient safety throughout all stages of the trial. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects with HbA1c ≤6.5% at 1 year AND free of severe hypoglycemic events from Day 28 to Day 365, inclusive, after the islet transplant. Secondary Endpoints Secondary efficacy endpoints: At 75±7, 365 ± 14 ,and 730 ± 14 days following the islet transplant(s): the percent reduction in insulin requirements; HbA1c; Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE); Lability Index (LI); Ryan hypoglycemia severity (HYPO) score; Clarke score; number of severe hypoglycemic episodes; basal (fasting) and 90-min glucose and c-peptide derived from the mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT); beta-score; C-peptide creatinine ratio; acute insulin response to glucose (AIRglu), insulin sensitivity, and disposition index derived from the insulin-modified frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) test; glucose variability and hypoglycemia duration derived from the continuous glucose monitoring system® (CGMS); and Quality of life (QOL) measures: EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS), SF-36v2, Diabetes Distress scale). Secondary safety endpoints: Safety, including incidence of post-transplant infections, malignancies, morbidity, and other adverse events (AEs) (e.g., increased body weight and hypertension) associated with conventional immunosuppression. Renal function as measured by serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and other relevant laboratory parameters. Lipid profiles (triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol) over time. At 75 ± 7 and 365 ± 14 days following the islet transplant, and at two years following the final islet transplant: the incidence and severity of AEs related to the islet transplant procedure including: bleeding (\>2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin concentration); wound complication (infection or subsequent hernia); torsion of omentum; gastrointestinal obstruction; abscess; cysts; need for surgical intervention. The incidence and severity of AEs related to the immunosuppression including: allergy; reduction in GFR; addition or intensification of antihyperlipidemic therapy; gastrointestinal toxicity; neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia; viral, bacterial, or fungal infections; and benign or malignant neoplasms. The incidence of immune sensitization defined by presence of anti-HLA antibodies absent prior to transplantation. The incidence of discontinuation of immunosuppression. PROCEDURES Prior to transplantation, the patient is screened, qualified, listed for transplant, and signs the informed consent form. At the time a suitable islet preparation becomes available, the patient will receive allogeneic islet cells placed in an omental pouch. The details of this surgical procedure will be addressed in Question 5.0. Islet transplant will be performed under Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG, Thymoglobulin®) induction immunosuppression (5 doses, day -2 prior to transplant to day 2 post-transplant). Maintenance mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy (1-2 g/day as BID dosing) will be started on Day -1 pre-transplant. Tacrolimus will be administered orally twice daily on Day 1 post-transplant to maintain a trough level of 10-12 ng/mL for 3 months, then 6-10 ng/mL thereafter. Etanercept will be given IV before the islet transplant (50 mg), and then at 25 mg (subcutaneously) on post-operative day (POD) +3, +7 and +10. FOLLOW UP Subject will undergo a 24-month follow-up period following their islet transplant. 19 study visits during the first year after the transplant, and 4 more study visits during the 2nd year after the transplant.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
4
The intervention is transplanting the islets into an omental pouch instead of into the liver. The omentum is a large apron-like fold of membrane inside the abdomen that drapes over the intestines. This study will test to see if omental islet transplantation is safe and effective. Standard immunosuppressive medicines (anti-thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, sirolimus, etanercept) will be used in this study to prevent rejection of the islets.
Sirolimus will be used in case of tacrolimus or/and mycophenolate mofetil intolerance.
Clinical Islet Transplant Program
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
The incidence of Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: 2 years following islet transplant
The proportion of subjects with HbA1c ≤ 6.5% at 1 year AND free of severe hypoglycemic events from Day 28 to Day 365, inclusive, after the islet transplant
Time frame: From Day 28 to Day 365 inclusive after islet transplant
The percent reduction in insulin requirements at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
The percent reduction in insulin requirements at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
The percent reduction in insulin requirements at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Lability Index at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Lability Index at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Lability Index at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Ryan hypoglycemia severity score at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Ryan hypoglycemia severity score at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Ryan hypoglycemia severity score at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Clarke score at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Clarke score at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in Clarke score at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in number of severe hypoglycemic episodes at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in number of severe hypoglycemic episodes at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in number of severe hypoglycemic episodes at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in basal (fasting) and 90- min glucose and c-peptide derived from the mixed-meal tolerance test at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in basal (fasting) and 90- min glucose and c-peptide derived from the mixed-meal tolerance test at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in basal (fasting) and 90- min glucose and c-peptide derived from the mixed-meal tolerance test at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in beta-score at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in beta-score at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in beta-score at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in C-peptide creatinine ratio at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in C-peptide creatinine ratio at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in C-peptide creatinine ratio at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in acute insulin response to glucose at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in acute insulin response to glucose at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in acute insulin response to glucose at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in insulin sensitivity at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in insulin sensitivity at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in insulin sensitivity at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in disposition index derived from the insulin-modified frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) test at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in disposition index derived from the insulin-modified frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) test at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in disposition index derived from the insulin-modified frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) test at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in glucose variability and hypoglycemia duration derived from the continuous glucose monitoring system® (CGMS) at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in glucose variability and hypoglycemia duration derived from the continuous glucose monitoring system® (CGMS) at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in glucose variability and hypoglycemia duration derived from the continuous glucose monitoring system® (CGMS) at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in diabetes distress scores measured by Diabetes Distress scale at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in diabetes distress scores measured by Diabetes Distress scale at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in diabetes distress scores measured by Diabetes Distress scale at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in health status measured by EQ-5D at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in health status measured by EQ-5D at Day 365± 14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in health status measured by EQ-5D at Day 730± 14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in the score measured by Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-HFS at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in the score measured by Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-HFS at Day 365±14after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365± 4 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in the score measured by Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-HFS at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in health scores obtained through SF-36v2 health survey at Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 75±7 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in health scores obtained through SF-36v2 health survey at Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 365±14 after islet transplant
Change from baseline in health scores obtained through SF-36v2 health survey at Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Time frame: Baseline and Day 730±14 after islet transplant
Incidence of AEs associated with conventional immunosuppression
Time frame: 2 years following islet transplant
Renal function (serum creatinine and GFR)
Time frame: Day 75 ± 7, Day 365 ± 14 and Day 730± 14 after islet transplant
Lipid profiles (triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol)
Time frame: Day 75 ± 7, Day 365 ± 14 and Day 730± 14 after islet transplant
The incidence of AEs related to the islet transplant procedure
Time frame: 2 years following islet transplant
The incidence of immune sensitization defined by presence of anti-HLA antibodies absent prior to transplantation
Time frame: 2 years following islet transplant
The incidence of discontinuation of immunosuppression
Time frame: 2 years following islet transplant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.