The purpose of this research is to develop and test the feasibility of an exercise intervention for persons with painful knee osteoarthritis involving the patella (kneecap). Participants in the patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) group will be treated with a 6-week supervised exercise program that targets strengthening the hip and trunk core muscles. Painfree control participants will attend one session to gather biomechanical, strength, and function data for use in comparison to the patellofemoral osteoarthritis group. Feasibility outcomes include adherence to the treatment program, recruitment, and retention. It is hypothesized that PFOA group participants will change score on a knee pain and function questionnaire by the minimum clinically important difference score for positive improvement at the end of the 6-week intervention program.
The investigators propose to develop and test the feasibility of a 6-week supervised hip and core muscle exercise intervention for persons with painful patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA), a common condition for middle-aged and older adults. Currently there is limited evidence regarding effective conservative interventions for PFOA, a chronic condition that is painful and limits function and quality of life. Exercise is recommended as a first-line treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but the optimal type of exercise for PFOA is unknown. This intervention is based upon similar programs shown to improve pain and function in younger persons with patellofemoral pain, a condition that may lead to PFOA. Feasibility outcomes include adherence to the treatment program, recruitment, retention, and the impact of the intervention on participants' pain and function at 6-weeks and 6 months after finishing the program. The investigators will also compare PFOA participants to a matched pain-free volunteer control group to explore the differences in their biomechanics, muscle strength, pain report, and function at baseline. Data from this feasibility study will be used to design a future randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of conservative exercise interventions for PFOA. The investigators' overarching goal is to develop a conservative exercise intervention that improves the symptoms, function, and quality of life of persons with PFOA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of the Sciences
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Feasibility (adherence)
Adherence to supervised program (≥ 80% complete 10 supervised exercise sessions and 2 data collection sessions): Percentage adherence.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Feasibility (retention rates)
Completion of baseline and 6-week evaluation sessions. Percentage completion for both data collection sessions.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Feasibility (follow-up response): questionnaire
Response to 6-month follow-up - return Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire (≥ 80% complete and return KOOS): Percentage completion and return for KOOS.
Time frame: 6 months
Feasibility (recruitment rates)
Total number enrolled and total number screened out.
Time frame: 4 years
Feasibility (establish viability of underlying treatment model): global rating of change
Response to participation in intervention program in terms of overall rating of change (≥ 80% will achieve Global Rating of Change score ≥ 3 \[scale -5 to 5\] - positive numbers indicate positive change).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Feasibility (follow-up response): exercise diary
Response to 6-month follow-up - return exercise diary (≥ 80% complete and return exercise diary): Percentage completion and return for diary.
Time frame: 6 months
Feasibility (establish viability of underlying treatment model): pain rating
Response to participation in intervention program in terms of pain rating (≥ 80% will change score on KOOS pain subscale by the minimum clinically important difference score for positive improvement \[positive change of 10 points\] - at the end of the 6-week intervention program).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Feasibility (establish viability of underlying treatment model): activity of daily living rating
Response to participation in intervention program in terms of activity of daily living rating (≥ 80% will change score on KOOS activity of daily living (ADL) subscale by the minimum clinically important difference score for positive improvement \[positive change of 10 points\] - at the end of the 6-week intervention program).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Establish impact of intervention on physical performance
Change in score on Timed-Up-and-Go test.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Determine long-term benefits of intervention: pain rating
Change in score of KOOS pain subscale score for positive improvement: 6-month follow-up KOOS versus baseline KOOS scores (more positive scores equals lower pain level)
Time frame: 6 months
Determine long-term benefits of intervention: activity of daily living rating
Change in score of KOOS ADL subscale score for positive improvement: 6-month follow-up KOOS versus baseline KOOS scores (more positive scores equals better function in activities of daily living)
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.