The purpose of the study is to study the effect of anatomical direct insertion ACL reconstruction compared with conventional anatomical ACL reconstruction.
The investigators divide 320 patients with ACL rupture into 4 groups, each group has 80 patients. The operation technique is different among the groups: group A: conventional anatomical double bundle acl reconstruction, group B: conventional anatomical single bundle acl reconstruction, group DA: direct insertion double bundle acl reconstruction, group DSB: direct insertion single bundle acl reconstruction. The investigators compare the results of the patients of each group at 2 years of surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
320
ACL reconstruction based on direct insertion of ACL.
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle technique
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using double bundle technique
Lysholm score of the knee
Lysholm score of the knee was evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years post operation . Scale name:score
Time frame: two years
Tegner score of the knee
Tegner score of the knee was evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years post operation . Scale name:score
Time frame: two years
IKDC score of the knee
IKDC score of the knee was evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years post operation . Scale name:score
Time frame: two years
KT-2000 of the knee
KT-2000 of the knee was evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years post operation.
Time frame: two years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.