The proposed study is designed to evaluate the performance of the ALTOIDA™ System as a tool to assist physicians in diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in real-world clinical settings. The design of this study is guided by two overriding factors: 1) to optimize the performance of the ALTOIDA™ Neuro Motor Index (NMI) prognosis classifiers, the subjects making up the training sets must be well characterized as to their clinical diagnosis, and 2) all ALTOIDA™ tests must be performed and reproduced in real-world clinical settings. Although there is already a large body of peer-reviewed scientific literature demonstrating that certain digital biomarker patterns are associated with certain neurologic conditions, the utilization of such tools for the evaluation of neurologic disorders is still considered an emerging science and therefore in the investigational stage. Although this protocol will report on brain patterns of certain neurologic conditions such as cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease, based on patterns published in peer-reviewed journals, such findings are not considered stand alone or diagnostic per se and should always be considered by the primary physician in conjunction with the patient's clinical condition. These data should only be used as additional information to add to the primary physician's diagnostic impression.
The goal of the study is to determine relationships among the clinical, cognitive, imaging, genetic, and biochemical biomarker characteristics of the stage of the AD spectrum that precedes MCI, the mildest symptomatic phase of AD, referred to here as MCI. The ADNI-GO model posits that AD begins with amyloid β (Aβ) deposition in the cortex, which leads to synaptic dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and cognitive/ functional decline. It may be possible to determine the future development of ALZ in a preclinical state in a cognitively normal but high risk individual at least 18-24 months before any symptoms develop of cognitive impairment. In addition a newly proposed research framework proposes to use biomarkers for amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN) to classify MCI patients. Some of the leading-edge technologies under study are brain-imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET), including FDG-PET (which measures glucose metabolism in the brain); PET using a radioactive compound (F-AV-45) that measures brain beta-amyloid; and structural MRI. Brain scans are showing scientists how the brain's structure and function change as AD starts and progresses. Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid are revealing other changes that could identify which patients with MCI will develop Alzheimer's. Scientists are looking at levels of beta-amyloid and tau in cerebrospinal fluid. (Abnormal amounts of the amyloid and tau proteins in the brain are hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease.) The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of the ALTOIDA™ System as as a tool to assist physicians in diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in real-world clinical settings. The study will be : A. Multi-Center Study: primary goal of this study will be to evaluate the ALTOIDA™ Platform across multiple study locations. This will demonstrate an ability to perform tests, collect data, and generate classifications irrespective of variations in testing locations and personnel. 12 international study sites will be selected with the US based sites being a recognized NIH Center of Excellence for Alzheimer's disease or other nationally recognized Alzheimer's disease research center. Each site will evaluate up to 60 community dwellers evenly divided between MCI patients and age-matched controls (while the prevalence of AD is approximately 12% in the general population, the ratio of AD to normal among those who visit a clinic for memory or cognitive related issues is between 50-60%). Each site will follow the same testing protocols. Participants will be asked if they would like to participate in a protocol that monitors their prospective risk for developing ALZ short term, and whether certain of their prescribed medications may have a protective effect. Those who are accepting to be participants are then enrolled in the study. Enrollees will be tested for risk factors for having pre-clinical ALZ. Individuals identified as being at risk at baseline are followed at 6 month intervals for a 48 month period using psychometric testing and functional neuroimaging. Their maintenance of cognitive stability or cognitive decline is monitored while under the care of their PMD and while taking medications of interest. All test data will be uploaded to the online ALTOIDA™ database server. B. The overall impact of this study will be increased knowledge concerning the sequence and timing of events leading to MCI and from MCI to AD, development of better clinical and Neuro Motor Index prognosis methods for early detection and for monitoring the progression of these conditions, and facilitation of clinical trials of treatments to slow disease progression, ultimately contributing to the prevention of AD.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
548
Data collection at baseline: clinical (neurological, activity of the daily life, instrumental activity of the daily life, depression scale), standard neuropsychological exam, ALTOIDA and neurophysiology (EEG/ERPs) in both Prodromal and Preclinical AD subjects. In both Prodromal and Preclinical AD subjects, APOE genotyping. The local clinical Unit should document the positivity at the baseline session of at least one of the biomarkers of AD mentioned above. Data collection at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of follow up: clinical (neurological, activity of the daily life, instrumental activity of the daily life, depression scale), standard neuropsychological exam, ALTOIDA and neurophysiology (EEG/ERPs) in both Prodromal and Preclinical AD subjects.
Change in Diagnostic Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC-AUC)
The machine learning models capturing voice data, hands micromovements \& micro-errors, posture changes, eye tracking, visuospatial navigation micro-errors and spatio-temporal gait parameters developed for the Altoida system will be tested in this prospective cohort. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the model will be tested in differential diagnosis between the study groups as well as the accuracy of prediction cognitive decline as measured by neuropsychological test battery in the MCI group.
Time frame: approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Clinical Measure 1
Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), including CDR sum of boxes (CDR-SB) and clinician's diagnostic assessment
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 42 months of follow up
Change From Baseline in Clinical Measure 2
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Clinical Measure 3
Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Clinical Measure 4
Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Clinical Measure 5
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Clinical Measure 6
Activities of the daily life (ADL)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Clinical Measure 7
Instrumental activities of the daily life (iADL)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
ADAS Cog
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
-Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (Copy)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Trail Making Test
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Digit Span Forward
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Category Fluency (Animals \& Vegetables)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Digit Span Backward
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (30 minute delay)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised (WMS-R) Digit Span
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Wechsler Memory Scale Logical Memory
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Wechsler Memory Scale Paragraph Memory (Immediate \& Delayed Recall)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised (WAIS-R) Digit-Symbol Substitution Test
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Measure
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Secondary Resting State EEG Endpoints
EEG endpoints (occipital, parietal, and temporal sources of delta and low-frequency alpha rhythms) according to the PharmaCog WP5 European ADNI. These markers are expected to be related to disease status at baseline assessment and disease progression at follow-ups. Exploratory probability level of p \< 0.05.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Secondary Resting State Auditory Oddball ERP Endpoints
ERP endpoints (latency of scalp parietal P3b peak and activity of the cingulate and temporal-parietal sources of P3b peak according to PharmaCog WP5 European ADNI). These markers are expected to be related to disease status at baseline assessment and disease progression at follow-ups. Exploratory probability level of p \< 0.05.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Total Abeta 1-42 (Aβ42) Amyloid Deposition
Currently available evidence strongly supports the position that the initiating event in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is related to abnormal processing of beta-amyloid (Abeta) peptide, ultimately leading to formation of Abeta plaques in the brain. Baseline amount of CSF Abeta(42) will be investigated.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change of Brain Amyloid Deposition
Biomarkers of brain beta-amyloidosis are reductions in CSF Abeta(42) and increased amyloid PET tracer retention. The change in amyloid deposition as measured by Abeta 1-42 (Aβ42) and its relation to the genetic, clinical, neuropsychological, EEG and ERP endpoints measurement will be assessed.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Change of CSF Biomarkers Tau and ptau181 Values
The change in CSF biomarkers tau and ptau181 values and its relation to the genetic, clinical, neuropsychological, EEG and ERP endpoints measurement will be assessed.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
MRI (Optional)
Relationship between MRI measures (brain volume, hippocampus atrophy, vascular lesions) and biomarkers.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Changes in Driving Breaking Force
Changes in driving behavior, such as breaking force observed continuesly through in-car sensors or dongles.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Changes in Driving Acceleration Velocity
Changes in driving behavior, such as acceleration velocity observed continuesly through in-car sensors or dongles.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Changes in Driving Direction
Changes in driving behavior, such as sudden changes of direction observed continuesly through in-car sensors or dongles.
Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and approximately 40 months follow up
Changes in Driving Violations
Changes in driving behavior, such as speed limit violations observed continuesly through in-car sensors or dongles.
Time frame: Continuous measurement for approximately 12 months follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.