The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of comparing outcomes of patients treated de novo with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) versus matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for pediatric acquired severe aplastic anemia.
A major challenge in treating pediatric Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA) is the determination of best primary therapy for patients who lack a fully matched related donor for HSCT. Good survival outcomes have been seen with IST, but initial and late failures, CSA dependence, persistent cytopenias and secondary Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) / Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in a portion of patients leave considerable room for improvement. MUD HSCT survival in SAA has markedly improved, but a direct comparison of this approach with IST is necessary to determine whether this approach is feasible and will lead to better Event Free Survival. This trial will address the feasibility of randomization, test whether patients can be evaluated in a timely fashion and safely begin therapy with MUD HSCT or IST, and give a preliminary assessment of the safety of up-front MUD HSCT. If successful, this trial will lead to a future prospective trial comparing directly IST to MUD HSCT in this disease.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
cyclosporine
Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
horse anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
Palo Alto, California, United States
UCSF
San Francisco, California, United States
Percentage of patients randomized to HSCT that actually complete HSCT
Feasibility of comparing outcomes of patients treated de novo with IST versus matched unrelated donor HSCT for pediatric acquired severe aplastic anemia as defined by percentage of patients randomized to HSCT that actually complete HSCT.
Time frame: 4 years
Time from screening consent to randomization
To measure the time from screening consent and randomization of patients to initiation of the preparative regimen of those randomized to HSCT.
Time frame: 4 years
Number of patients that fail to receive their primary assigned therapy (HSCT or IST).
Number of patients fail to receive their primary assigned therapy (HSCT or IST).
Time frame: 4 years
Reasons why patients fail to receive their primary assigned therapy (HSCT or IST).
Reasons why patients fail to receive their primary assigned therapy (HSCT or IST).
Time frame: 4 years
Treatment-related mortality at one year from randomization in both arms
Number of deaths that are treatment related
Time frame: 1 Year
Overall Survival at one year from randomization in both arms
percentage of enrolled patients living at 1 year post randomization
Time frame: 1 Year
Time from randomization to neutrophil recovery in both arms
Time from randomization to neutrophil recovery in both arms
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)
methotrexate
fludarabine
cyclophosphamide
low-dose total body irradiation (TBI)
Immunosuppressive Therapy (IST)
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Cohen Children's Medical Center
Queens, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
...and 3 more locations
Time frame: 4 years
Time from randomization to platelet recovery in both arms
Time from randomization to platelet recovery in both arms
Time frame: 4 years
Time from randomization to red blood cell recovery in both arms
Time from randomization to red blood cell recovery in both arms
Time frame: 4 years
Time from randomization to cessation of immune suppression recovery in both arms
Time from randomization to cessation of immune suppression recovery in both arms
Time frame: 4 years
Rates of primary and secondary graft rejection in the MUD HSCT arm
Rates of primary and secondary graft rejection in the MUD HSCT arm
Time frame: 4 years
Rates of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD, and extensive chronic GVHD in the MUD HSCT arm
Rates of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD, and extensive chronic GVHD in the MUD HSCT arm
Time frame: 4 years
Rates of IST response
Rates of IST response
Time frame: 4 years
Rates of IST relapse
Rates of IST relapse
Time frame: 4 years
Rates of secondary MDS or AML in both treatment arms.
Rates of secondary MDS or AML in both treatment arms.
Time frame: 4 years
Rates of other secondary malignancies in both treatment arms.
Rates of other secondary malignancies in both treatment arms.
Time frame: 4 years
Development of symptomatic PNH in both treatment arms.
Development of symptomatic PNH in both treatment arms.
Time frame: 4 years
Incidence of significant infection in both treatment arms
Incidence of significant infection in both treatment arms
Time frame: 4 years
Time to immune reconstitution in the HSCT arm
Time to immune reconstitution in the HSCT arm
Time frame: 4 years