Patient Convenience Study- NIS RELATE

Boehringer Ingelheim1,313 enrolled

Overview

The aim of this non-interventional study is to describe patient's perception of anticoagulant treatment when using Pradaxa® to prevent stroke and systemic embolism while suffering from atrial fibrillation (according to its approved indication in the approved dosages of 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily) in comparison to standard care using Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA).

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

1,313

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

Pradaxa (dabigatran)DRUG

Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate)110mg or 150mg

Vitamin K antagonistDRUG

Vitamin K antagonist or Pradaxa

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion criteria: Cohort A: 1. A. Written informed consent prior to participation 2. A. Female and male patients \>= 18 years of age with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. 3. A. At least 3 months of continuous VKA treatment for stroke prevention prior to baseline assessment. 4. A. Patients switched to Pradaxa® according Summary of Product Characteristics and physician's discretion. OR Cohort B: 1. B. Written informed consent prior to participation. 2. B. Female and male patients \>= 18 years of age newly diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no previous treatment for stroke prevention (no use of any oral anticoagulant (OAC) within one year prior to enrolment). 3. B. Stroke prevention treatment initiated with Pradaxa® or VKA according to Summary of Product Characteristics and physician's discretion. Exclusion criteria: 1. Contraindication to the use of Pradaxa® or VKA as described in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). 2. Patients receiving Pradaxa® or VKA for any other condition than stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. 3. Current participation in any clinical trial of a drug or device. 4. Current participation in an European registry on the use of oral anticoagulation in AF.

Locations (50)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire, Part 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second Assessment Compared to Baseline Assessment

Mean Perception of Anticoagulant treatment Questionnaire, part 2 (PACT-Q2) scores, for patients in cohort A, at second assessment compared to baseline assessment. The PACT-Q2 is composed of 3 dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease \& treatment (2 items), \& anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). In this outcome the mean convenience \& satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at second assessment (Visit 2) were compared with baseline assessment (Visit 1). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience \& for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together \& rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed \& rescaled on 0-100 scale to determine satisfaction score. High scores are more favorable. PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from analysis.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) and second assessment Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Baseline Assessment

Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort A, at last assessment compared to baseline assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at the last assessment (Visit 3) were compared with the baseline assessment (Visit 1). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction score. High scores are more favorable. PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from the analysis.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) and last assessment Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second Assessment Compared Between Treatment Groups

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Harapan Kita National Cardiovascular Center

Jakarta Barat, Indonesia

Rumah Sakit Bina Waluya

Jakarta Timur, Indonesia

Rumah Sakit Siloam Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Tangerang, Indonesia

Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah

Alor Star, Malaysia

Institut Jantung Negara

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Hospital University Kebangsaan Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

University Malaya Medical Centre

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan

Kuantan, Malaysia

UiTM Sg Buloh Campus

Sg Buloh, Malaysia

National Heart Center

Singapore, Singapore

...and 40 more locations

Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort B, at second assessment compared between treatment groups. Convenience dimension score and satisfaction dimension score of PACT-Q2 both range from 0 to 100 with high scores indicate better outcome. Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in Cohort B, were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients at the second assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction scores of PACT-Q2 were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Pradaxa® and VKA patients were matched based on propensity scores using a variable ratio, parallel, balanced 2:1, nearest neighbour matching algorithm with a caliper width of 0.05 and without replacement. PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from the analysis.

Time frame: Second assessment Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment Groups

Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort B, at last assessment compared between treatment groups. Convenience dimension score and satisfaction dimension score of PACT-Q2 both range from 0 to 100 with high scores indicate better outcome. Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in Cohort B, were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients at the last assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction scores of PACT-Q2 were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Pradaxa® and VKA patients were matched based on propensity scores using a variable ratio, parallel, balanced 2:1, nearest neighbour matching algorithm with a caliper width of 0.05 and without replacement.

Time frame: Last assessment - Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical Parameters

Categorical parameters of the patient characteristics at baseline included age, gender, Stroke- and/or bleeding related risk factors in medical history (MH), co-morbidities (CoMo), concomitant therapies (CM) and dosing of Pradaxa® (DoP).

Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

Patient Characteristics at Baseline - Duration of Previous VKA Treatment for Cohort A

Duration of continuous VKA treatment for stroke prevention prior to baseline assessment (Cohort A)

Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

Secondary Outcomes

Patient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score

CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

Patient Characteristics at Baseline - HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score

HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

Patient Characteristics at Baseline - Creatinine Clearance

Creatinine clearance at baseline is a measure of the patient's kidney function and is one of the baseline patient characteristics.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second Assessment

Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort A, at last assessment compared to second assessment. The PACT-Q2 is composed of 3 dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The mean convenience and satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at the last assessment (Visit 3)were compared with the second assessment (Visit 2). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction score.

Time frame: Second assessment - Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA) and last assessment - Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

Description of Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire, Part 1 (PACT-Q1) Items at Baseline for Cohort B

For Cohort B, scores of PACT-Q1 at baseline were summarised descriptively. The PACT-Q1 is composed of a single dimension (7 items) covering the expectations of patients regarding their anticoagulant treatment and is to be administered before treatment initiation. The PACT-Q1 scores ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely/Completely/ Very much).

Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)