This study is designed to collect information during a procedure that is routine care for treating a blockage in a blood vessel in the upper part of the participant's leg. This study is for data collection reasons to help doctors gain better understanding of the treatment of disease in the blood vessels of the legs. You will be treated with two devices that are routine, or standard of care, for your doctor to treat blockages in the blood vessel of the leg. The treatment is for a blockage or narrowing caused by plaque build-up in the blood vessel. Data will be collected to assess what length of time the blood vessel will be prevented from re-narrowing through twenty-four (24) months after the procedure.
This prospective study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two FDA 510(k) cleared DA products (Medtronic HawkOne® and TurboHawkM)19-21 and FDA approved drug-coated balloon (Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral®)22 used in combination to debulk moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal artery atherosclerotic lesions as defined by the published Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) followed by treatment with the Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral® DCB for the prevention of restenosis as assessed at 12-month follow-up. The data will be independently adjudicated by an angiographic and DUS core labs. An independent IVUS core lab to determine change in maximal luminal plaque area, pre- and post-atherectomy and post-adjunctive DCB therapy will adjudicate the assessment of debulking effectiveness. The operator will be blinded to all IVUS images and procedural success will be based on usual and customary angiographic visual assessments. The post-atherectomy plaque debulking effectiveness (change in plaque area) and vascular calcium severity as assessed by IVUS will be correlated with the angiographic metrics of RVD, pre- and post-treatment MLD, calcium grade (using PACSS), lesion length, sub-intimal wire passage, CTO length, and angiographic patterns of restenosis in all patients who sustain a CD-TLR through 12-months. All atherectomy specimens will be collected and provided to an independent histology laboratory for analysis of calcium content and vessel wall elements. The amount of embolic debris captured in the Spider® Distal Protection Device will be visually assessed. The study will validate PACSS definitions of moderate and severe calcium and its location (intimal, medial or mixed) as they relate to intra-procedural and Major Adverse Events (MAEs) through 30-day clinical follow-up (e.g., grade D-F dissections requiring provisional stenting, vessel perforation requiring an additional intervention or surgery, vessel thrombosis requiring adjunctive technologies and/or lytic agents, unplanned amputation, intra-procedure distal embolization, and CD-TLR).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
102
Use of FDA Cleared Directional Atherectomy (DA) Devices. Medtronic HawkOne® Directional Atherectomy System or TurboHawk™ Plaque Excision System. DA followed by DCB will be performed in all enrolled subjects.
FDA Approved Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Technology. Medtronic IN.PACT® Admiral® DCB will be used after DA.
It is recommended that the Medtronic Spider™ Distal protection device (DPD) be paired with DA when used in complex, calcified lesions (TurboHawk™ IFU).
Lesion IVUS assessment using the Volcano Visions® PV .014" IVUS catheter will be required in all cases.
Only FDA approved nitinol stents can be used if provisional stenting is required.
Iowa Methodist Medical Center
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
St. Elizabeth's
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Mississippi
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Rex
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Austin Heart
Austin, Texas, United States
Longview Cardiac and Vascular Consultants
Longview, Texas, United States
Primary Patency
One-year primary patency (PSVR ≤2.4) and freedom from CD-TLR in subjects with long, moderate and severely calcified symptomatic femoropopliteal arterial stenoses and occlusions after treatment with DA+DCB.
Time frame: One year
Freedom from MAE
Freedom from (MAEs) defined as freedom from flow-limiting dissections (D-F), vessel perforations, unplanned amputation, intra-procedure distal athero-embolization and clinically-driven TVR in subjects with long, moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal lesions and occlusions through 30 day follow up.
Time frame: One month
Device Success
Device Success: ≤ 30% residual stenosis after completion of directional atherectomy procedure (stand-alone) as assessed by the angiographic core lab.
Time frame: Post Index Procedure
Procedural Success
Procedural Success: ≤30% residual stenosis after completion of the directional atherectomy procedure and DCB as assessed by the angiographic core lab.
Time frame: Post Index Procedure
IVUS
Core lab assessed correlation between IVUS metrics of luminal diameter, change in plaque area and luminal gain pre- and post-atherectomy, and angiographic core lab assessment of pre- and post-percent diameter stenosis (%DS) and the extent of vascular calcification will be determined
Time frame: Post Index Procedure
PACCS scoring and related procedural complications
The association of moderate and severe calcification as defined by the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) and the change in %DS, procedure related complications (residual stenosis ≥50%, vessel recoil and/or high-grade dissections requiring use of adjunct technologies) visual quantification of embolic material in the distal protection device and MAEs through 30-days will be assessed
Time frame: 1 month
Directional Atherectomy
Directional Atherectomy device specific metrics of total directional atherectomy time as a function of lesion length, lesion morphology, and total procedure time.
Time frame: Post Index Procedure
Major Adverse Events thru 24 months
Major adverse events through 24-months defined as composite clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TVR) defined as any re-intervention within the target vessel due to symptoms associated with a drop from post-intervention ABI/TBI \>20% or \>0.15, major unplanned amputation of the treated limb, and all-cause mortality post 30 day follow up through 2 year follow up.
Time frame: 24 months
Post procedure TVR
TVR within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 months
CD-TLR post procedure
TLR within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 months
Time to CD-TLR thru 24 months post procedure
Time to first clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) through 24 months post-index procedure
Time frame: 24 months
Major target limb amputation post procedure
Major target limb amputation within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 months
Thrombosis- target lesion post procedure
Thrombosis at the target lesion site within 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 months
Primary sustained clinical improvement
Primary sustained clinical improvement: An improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of at least one class in amputation- and TVR-free surviving subjects at 6, 12, 24 months post procedure
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 months
Secondary sustained clinical improvement
Secondary sustained clinical improvement: An improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of at least one class including the need for clinically-driven TVR in amputation-free surviving subjects at 6, 12, 24 months post index procedure
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.