The purpose of the study was to assess the effects of different doses of tropifexor (LJN452) with respect to safety, tolerability, and on markers of liver inflammation in patients with NASH
Part A In Part A, 77 subjects were randomized at baseline to receive tropifexor (10 μg, 30 μg, 60 μg or 90 μg) or placebo (Arms A, B, C, D and E) for 12 weeks. After ≥ 90% of the subjects from Part A completed 8 weeks of treatment, the first interim analysis of all Part A data was performed and the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) recommended evaluation of 90 μg tropifexor (safe andefficacious) in Part B. The treatment arms of Part A were completed through Week 16 without adaptation. Part B Randomization for Part B was started after the DMC recommendations on the dose to be used in Part B were implemented by the sponsor. As planned in the study protocol, since the first interim analysis selected one active dose (90 μg) to be tested in Part B, one of the other originally planned active treatment arms (60 μg) was included with a smaller sample size to confirm the earlier findings of this dose observed in Part A. Therefore, in Part B, 121 subjects, were randomized at baseline to receive tropifexor (90 μg and 60 μg) or placebo (Arms F, G and H) for 12 weeks. Part C was introduced as a result of the DMC recommendation to pursue doses \> 90 μg. Randomization in Part C started once the Part B randomization was completed. In Part C, 152 subjects were randomized at baseline to receive 140 μg or 200 μg tropifexor or placebo (Arms I, J and K) for 48 weeks. One patient was treated at 2 sites but is still only one patient. 350 total enrollment, and not 351.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
350
Comparison of different doses of drug
Comparator
Number of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Number of Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients with TEAEs
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12 (Primary Outcome Measure). For Part C, EoT was Week 48 (Secondary Outcome Measure)
Change in Transaminase Levels (ALT)
The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) test is a blood test that checks for liver damage. High levels of ALT may indicate liver damage. Normal range for ALT is typically 10 to 45 U/L or so (varies a little by age and gender). Elevation of these values indicate more liver inflammation/damage. ALT elevation is not unexpected in this patient population Dose relationship of tropifexor (LJN452) on ALT marker of hepatic inflammation in NASH from baseline to week 12 Summary statistics of change in ALT from baseline to EOT by treatment
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12 (Primary Outcome Measure). For Part C, EoT was Week 48 (Secondary Outcome Measure)
Change in Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
To determine the dose relationship of tropifexor (LJN452) on markers of hepatic inflammation (AST) in NASH from baseline to Week 12 The alanine aminotransferase (AST) test is a blood test that checks for liver damage. High levels of AST may indicate liver damage. Normal range for AST is typically 10 to 45 U/L or so (varies a little by age and gender). Elevation of these values indicate more liver inflammation/damage AST elevation is not unexpected in this patient population The aspartate aminotransferase (AST) test is a blood test that checks for liver damage. Higher levels indicate more possible liver damage Summary statistics of change in AST from baseline up to end of treatment (EOT)
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12 (Primary Outcome Measure). For Part C, EoT was Week 48 (Secondary Outcome Measure)
Change From Baseline in % of Fat in the Liver Assessed Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Repeated measures analysis: Relative change in percentage of fat in the liver assessed using MRI from baseline by visit up to EOT (Full analysis set)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
Madison, Alabama, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Coronado, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Pasadena, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Rialto, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
San Diego, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
San Francisco, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Lonetree, Colorado, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
...and 71 more locations
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12 (Primary Outcome Measure). For Part C, EoT was Week 48 (Secondary Outcome Measure)
Change From Baseline in Weight
Repeated measures for LS mean change in weight after 12 weeks of treatment
Time frame: 48 weeks
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Repeated measures for the LS mean change in BMI after 12 weeks of treatment. Body mass index (BMI) is a measure of body fat based on height and weight
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip (WTH) Ratio
The LS mean change in waist to hip ratio after 12 weeks of treatment
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Biomarker FGF19
Dose-response relationship of tropifexor (LJN452) on FGF19 over time, a marker of FXR target engagement in the gut. ANCOVA: Ratio of FGF19 (pg/mL) post-dose to pre-dose at Week 6 Value at 6 weeks minus value at baseline
Time frame: baseline, week 6
Change From Baseline in Biomarker C4
Dose-response relationship of LJN452 on C4, a marker of hepatic target engagement at 4 hours post dose C4 (ng/mL): Summary statistics by treatment and visit
Time frame: Week 6, 4 hours post dose
Change From Baseline on Markers of Liver Fibrosis, Fibroscan
Dose-response relationship of tropifexor (LJN452) on markers of liver fibrosis commonly available such as Fibroscan® Liver stiffness (kPa): Summary statistics by treatment and visit FibroScan is a specialized ultrasound machine for measuring fibrosis (scarring) in the liver Scores range from 0-4 with zero being no liver scarring and 4 being advanced liver scarring (cirrhosis)
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12. For Part C, EoT was Week 48
Change From Baseline on Markers of Liver Fibrosis Panel (ELF) Score
ANCOVA: LS Mean Change in Enhanced liver fibrosis panel (ELF) score from baseline by visit up to EOT. The total ELF score reference range calculated non-parametrically is 6.72 (90% CI 6.58-6.84) to 9.79 (90% CI 9.45-10.01); Journal of Hepatology 2013 vol. 59 j 236-242. Enhanced liver fibrosis Test (ELF) panel: the following was assessed: hyaluronic acid (HA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1), and amino-terminal pro-peptide of procollagen type III (PIIINP). The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score is a linear combination of TIMP-1, PIIINP, and HA with the following formula: ELF score = 2.494+0.846 x ln(HA) + 0.735 x ln (PIIINP) + 0.391 x ln (TIMP-1).
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12. For Part C, EoT was Week 48
Change From Baseline on Markers of Liver Fibrosis, Fibrotest (Parts A+B)
Fibrosis biomarker test, originally called Fibrotest®/ Fibrosure®, is combines α2-macroglobulin (a2m), apolipoprotein A1 (aA1), total bilirubin (BIL), haptoglobin (h), GGT, and ALT. The coefficient for the score is calculated as: z = 4.467 x log(a2m) - 1.357 x log(h) + 1.017 x log(GGT) + 0.0281 x Age + 1.737 x log(BIL) - 1.184 x (aA1) + 0.301 x Gender - 5.54 where Gender = 1 for male and Gender = 0 for female. The score is then: 1/(1+e\^-z). Calculated scores range from 0.00 (no fibrosis) to 1.00 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis) (See Part C in separate outcomes that follows)
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT):12 weeks
Change From Baseline on Markers of Liver Fibrosis, Fibrotest, (Part C)
Fibrosis biomarker test, originally called Fibrotest®/ Fibrosure®, is combines α2-macroglobulin (a2m), apolipoprotein A1 (aA1), total bilirubin (BIL), haptoglobin (h), GGT, and ALT. The coefficient for the score is calculated as: z = 4.467 x log(a2m) - 1.357 x log(h) + 1.017 x log(GGT) + 0.0281 x Age + 1.737 x log(BIL) - 1.184 x (aA1) + 0.301 x Gender - 5.54 where Gender = 1 for male and Gender = 0 for female. The score is then: 1/(1+e\^-z). Calculated scores range from 0.00 (no fibrosis) to 1.00 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis)
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT) was 48 weeks
Change From Baseline on Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)
Summary statistics of change in GGT (IU/L) from baseline by visit up to EoT
Time frame: EoT for Parts A+B=12 weeks; EoT for Part C = 48 weeks
Change From Baseline on Fasting Lipid Profile
Repeated measures analysis: LS geometric mean ratio of fasting lipids to baseline by visit up to EOT
Time frame: End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12. For Part C, EoT was Week 48
Itch Based on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rating Scale
Repeated measures analysis: Change in VAS for Itch from baseline by visit up to EoT VAS score 0 = no disease; and 9 is severely advanced disease
Time frame: EoT for Parts A+B=12 weeks; EoT for Part C = 48 weeks
Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of LJN452
Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of tropifexor (LJN452)
Time frame: In Parts A and B, LJN452 Ctrough was measured on Study Days 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 84. In Part C LJN452 Ctrough was measured on Study Days 42, 84, 168, 280 and 336
C2h (Steady-state Drug Levels 2 Hours Postdose) of LJN452
Summary C2h of tropifexor (LJN452)
Time frame: Days 7 and 14 (10 and 30μg LJN452 C2h was not measured day 14)
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: At Least One Point Improvement in Fibrosis (NASH CRN Staging) Without Worsening of Steatohepatitis (Part C) - Total Score
Number of patients who have at least one point improvement in fibrosis (NASH CRN staging) without worsening of steatohepatitis (total score)
Time frame: EoT (Week 48)
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: At Least One Point Improvement in Fibrosis (NASH CRN Staging) Without Worsening - FDA
Number of patients who have at least one point improvement in fibrosis (NASH CRN staging) without worsening of steatohepatitis (FDA)
Time frame: EoT (Week 48)
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: At Least One Point Improvement in Fibrosis (NASH CRN Staging) Without Worsening - EMA
Number of patients who have at least one point improvement in fibrosis (NASH CRN staging) without worsening of steatohepatitis (EMA)
Time frame: EoT (Week 48)
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: Difference Between Treatment Groups (Part C) - Resolution of Steatohepatitis (Diagnostic Category)
Resolution of steatohepatitis (diagnostic category) without worsening of fibrosis (NASH CRN staging)
Time frame: EoT (Week 48)
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: Difference Between Treatment Groups (Part C) - Resolution of Steatohepatitis (FDA, EMA)
Resolution of steatohepatitis (diagnostic category) without worsening of fibrosis (NASH CRN staging)
Time frame: EoT (Week 48)