This study is designed to test the efficacy of tailored operative or non-operative management (NOM) for MRI defined low-risk rectal cancer following neoadjuvant intensity modulated radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine plus consolidation CapeOX. The main purpose of this study is to increase organ-preservation rate for low-risk rectal cancer patients.
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy comprise the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, following which 15-30% patients achieved pathological complete response need to receive the removal of rectum without residual tumor and suffer significant functional impairment even after sphincter preservation. Adjuvant chemotherapy is also questioned for its benefit for prolonged survival through the data from various studies. More evidence demonstrated that organ-preservation (e.g. non-operative management or local excision) for patients with clinical complete response (cCR) or near-cCR following nCRT had similar survival when compared with those received standard care. This study is designed to investigate the efficacy of neoadjuvant intensity modulated nCRT with concurrent capecitabine plus consolidation CapeOX for T2/DWI/Enhanced MRI defined cT2-T3b mid-low rectal cancer without threatening mesorectal fascia or extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) or mrN2 disease. According to the response to treatment evaluated by multi-modal assessment including digital exam, T2/DWI/Enhanced MRI, endoscopy and serum CEA test, patients will receive tailored operative management like local excision or total mesorectal excision, or non-operative management. Intention to treatment was also allowed in this study. Firstly, the investigators will observe the organ preservation rate at 2 years. Endpoints for organ-preservation like non-regrowth DFS, stoma-free survival and other conventional survival outcomes (DFS, OS) would be further collected. The short-term and long-term QoL will be measured in all patients. . Our baseline data showed the 48% of locally advanced rectal cancers could be downstaged to stage ypT0-2N0 following IMRT with concurrent capecitabine. We hypothesize that at least 24% of rectal cancers could be candidates for LE or NOM after IMRT and the rectum preservation rate will increase to 40% in low-risk rectal cancers by LE or NOM following IMRT plus consolidation CapeOX at 2 years. As a superiority design, this study need to recruit 64 patients to test this hypothesis, with 85% power (exact binomial test for proportions, alpha = 5 %, one-sided), If the number of responses is 22 or more, the hypothesis that P \<= 0.240 is rejected. We anticipate about 10 % loss to follow-up, so we will recruit an additional 8 patients and the study will recruit 72 patients in all.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
68
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Organ preservation rate
The rate of organ preservation will be defined as the percentage of patients who achieve cCR or near-cCR after neoadjuvant treatment followed by local excision or non-operative management (NOM). The time of organ preservation will be measured from the initiation of treatment.
Time frame: 3 years
Rate of non-regrowth disease-free survival (NR-DFS)
NR-DFS will be defined as the length of time after treatment until death (any cause), tumor relapse including local pelvic recurrence following TME or local resection and any distant metastasis during or after treatment. Surgical salvageable local regrowth occurs in non-operative management will not be defined as tumor relapse.
Time frame: 3 years
Stoma-free survival
Stoma-free survival will be defined as the length of time in which patients live with a temporary or permanent stoma and be measured from the initiation of treatment. Events for stoma-free survival are temporary or permanent stoma or death (any cause). Temporary ileostomy-free survival or colostomy-free survival will also be calculated.
Time frame: 3 years
Major adverse events
Adverse events will be graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0.
Time frame: 3 years
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
EORTC QLQ-C30 (Aaronson et al., 1993). The questionnaire assesses health status and quality of life of cancer patients using 30 items grouped in one global scale, five multi-item functioning scales, three symptom scales and six single symptom items. The items are scored on a four-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning or a higher level of symptoms. The validity and reliability of the Mandarin versions of the questionnaire have been established.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Time0: before neoadjuvant treatment; Time1: at 4 months after the completion of neoadjuvant radiation; Time2: 12 months after Time1; Time3: 24 months after Time1; Time4: 36 months after Time1
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Colorectal Cancer Module 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29)
EORTC QLQ-CR29 (Whistance et al., 2009). The questionnaire measures health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer, using 29 items grouped in four functional scale and 18 symptom scale The items are scored on a four-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning or a higher level of symptoms. The validity and reliability of the Mandarin versions of the questionnaire have been established.
Time frame: Time0: before neoadjuvant treatment; Time1: at 4 months after the completion of neoadjuvant radiation; Time2: 12 months after Time1; Time3: 24 months after Time1; Time4: 36 months after Time1