The aim of the study is to assess the use of the apomorphine pump in earlier stages of Parkinson' Disease (PD), when motor complications have just developed and before patients are significantly affected in their social and occupational functioning. The investigators hypothesize that apomorphine pump is superior in terms of positive impact on quality of life (QoL) to oral medical therapy alone at a relatively early stage of PD, before the appearance of severe disabling motor complications thus favoring the maintain of patients' social and occupational status with a significant positive economic impact of the health system.
The recruitment period will be 36 months. The duration of the study period will be one year for each patient due to: * adjustments of apomorphine pump parameters and oral medication (3 months interval), * motor and psychosocial changes which need time to develop and have an impact on QoL. At the end of the study period, two additional visits at Months 18 and 24 will be performed during an long term follow up to collect QoL and costs related data required to medico-economic analysis. APOMORPHINE (APO) group: The apomorphine pump will be installed and adjusted at baseline during a first hospitalization (10 days). Modifications of the hourly flow of the pump and readjustment (reduction) of anti-parkinsonian oral medication will be checked and performed at Months 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9 during visits and phone calls, and at month 3 during a 3 days hospitalization. Clinical evaluations will be performed at months 6 and 12. Control group: Patients will be treated by optimized medical treatment according to the guidelines of the European Federation of Neurological Societies. Dose adjustments will be done at Months 3, 6, 9. Clinical evaluations will be performed at months 6 and 12. In both groups, data for medico-economic evaluation will be collected from patients at baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24 for Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) and costs related data from a patient's diary and French Health Insurance database.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
134
Apomorphine (5 mg/ml) is supplied as solution for infusion in a 10 ml glass ampoule Hourly flow rate is adjusted during the whole duration of the study to doses of minimum 3 mg/hour up to a maximum of 10 mg/hour
Most efficient single treatment of Parkinson's disease symptoms or their combinations, in concordance with the guidelines of the European Federation of Neurological Societies
Amiens University Hospital
Amiens, France
Bayonne Côte Basque Hospital
Bayonne, France
Pellegrin University Hospital
Bordeaux, France
Pierre Wertheimer Hospital
Bron, France
Caen University Hospital
Caen, France
Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Lille University Hospital
Lille, France
APHM, hospital of Timone
Marseille, France
Clinique Beau-Soleil
Montpellier, France
Montpellier University Hospital
Montpellier, France
...and 10 more locations
Difference in the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ39) summary index between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: 12 months
Change in the Neurologist Global Impression of change (CGI-I)
Time frame: 12 months
Change in non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (MDS-UPDRS I) between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in motor aspects of experiences of daily in "on" and "off" medication (MDS-UPDRS II) between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in motor examination during "on" periods (MDS-UPDRS III) between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in motor complications with MDS-UPDRS IV between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in number of hours per day in the "best ON" state between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in number of hours per day in "ON" with dyskinesia between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in number of hours per day in "OFF" state between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in number of Sleeping-hours per day between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in Score of the Non-Motor Symptoms Scales (NMSS) for PD between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in psychosocial functioning PD (SCOPA-PS) between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in score of depressive symptoms (BDI) between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-S) between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in pain assessed on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in cognitive function between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Change in cognitive function assessed by the Neuroscience Parkinson network's (NS-PARK) battery test
Time frame: 12 months
Change in apathy assessed on the Apathy Scale between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in apathy assessed on the short version of Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change of dose for treatments assessed by levodopa (L-DOPA) equivalents between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Change in behavioral symptoms assessed by Ardouin Scale between the baseline assessment and the assessment at 12 months' follow up
Time frame: 12 months
Frequency, type and severity of therapy-related adverse events
Time frame: 12 months
Skin changes assessed by a clinical exam
Time frame: 12 months
Full blood count
Time frame: 12 months
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time frame: 12 months
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.