Evaluation of the activity, safety and patients reported outcome of ADT plus abiraterone, abiraterone plus APALUTAMIDE (a second-generation antiandrogen) or APALUTAMIDE alone in hormone naïve locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer which ADT was indicated.
Based on the current guidelines, ADT alone or combined with is antiandrogens are considered the appropriate active therapy for the patient population planned for this study. Recent data showed that chemotherapy also benefit patients in this setting. Even though, there is a clear unmet medical need for alternative treatment option in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Treatments that can delay disease progression, and are associated with less comorbidities would be of significant clinical benefit in this patient population. The study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of abiraterone plus APALUTAMIDE (a second-generation antiandrogen) or APALUTAMIDE alone without castration side effects and the other arm a combination of ADT and abiraterone; this last arm is to reflect an Abiraterone ongoing pivotal trial (LATITUDE), that assess the efficacy of adding abiraterone to castration in this setting of patients. Abiraterone had already showed clinical benefit in CRPC patients without prior chemotherapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
128
APALUTAMIDE 240-mg orally once daily (4 x 60-mg tablets) will be administered on a continual basis. For the purpose of scheduling the study assessments and treatment compliance a treatment cycle is defined as 28 days.
Abiraterone acetate 1,000 mg (four 250 mg tablets) should be taken orally once daily, in combination with oral dose prednisone 5mg twice daily continuously. For the purpose of scheduling the study assessments and treatment compliance a treatment cycle is defined as 28 days
Dosing of goserelin (dose and frequency of administration) will be consistent with the prescribing information and should only be adjusted if clinically indicated to achieve and maintain subcastrate concentrations of testosterone (50 ng/dL or 1.7 nM).
CRIO
Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
Clínica AMO
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil
Hospital Erasto Gaertner
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Number of patients that achieves an undetectable PSA level, defined as ≤ 0.2 ng/mL
Time frame: Week 25
PSA progression rate
Determination of PSA progression rate among the three experimental arms
Time frame: Week 25
Comparison of PSA progression rate
Comparison of PSA progression rate among the three experimental arms
Time frame: Week 25
PSA response of 50 and 80%
Determination of PSA response of 50 and 80% among the three experimental arms
Time frame: Week 25
Comparison of PSA response of 50 and 80%
Comparison of PSA response of 50 and 80% among the three experimental arms
Time frame: Week 25
Maximum PSA declines
Determination of maximum PSA declines among the three experimental arms
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25 to 52
Overall PSA change
Determination of overall PSA change among the three experimental arms
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25 to 52
Hormonal levels during treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25
Comparison of hormonal levels during treatment
Comparison of hormonal levels during treatment among the three experimental arms
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Subjects will receive prednisone 10mg/day.
Oncologia Rede D'Or S.A.
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Liga Norte Riograndense de Oncologia
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Hospital de Caridade de Ijuí
Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
CPO - Pucrs
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
Centro de Pesquisa Clínica em Hematologia e Oncologia - CEPHO
Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil
Grupo COI
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
...and 4 more locations
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25
Evaluation of bone mineral density according to RECIST 1.1
Time frame: Week 25
Comparison of bone mineral density according to RECIST 1.1 between three experimental groups
Time frame: Week 25
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time frame: Baseline to 2 years of follow-up
Number of participants with pain progression assessed by BPI-SF of three experimental arms
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25
Number of participants in opioid use during treatment among three experimental arms
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25
Comparison of pain progression assessed by opioid use
Comparison of pain progression assessed by opioid use between the experimental arms
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25
Comparison of pain progression assessed by BPI-SF questionnaire
Comparison of pain progression assessed by BPI-SF between the experimental arms
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25
Quality of life assessed by FACT-P questionnaire
Quality of life assessed by FACT-P questionnaire of the experimental arms
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25
Comparison of quality of life assessed by FACT-P questionnaire
Comparison of quality of life assessed by FACT-P questionnaire between the experimental arms
Time frame: Baseline up to week 25
Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS)
Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) among the experimental arms
Time frame: Week 25