Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-dermatologic malignancy in U.S. men. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is a commonly used diagnostic procedure for men with an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). It is estimated that more than 1 million TRUS-guided prostate biopsies are performed annually in the U.S. alone. However, a freehand TRUS-guided systematic biopsy (SB) procedure has significant limitations. First, freehand biopsy cores are often spatially clustered, rather than uniformly distributed, and do not accurately follow the recommended, sextant template. Second, a freehand TRUS-guided biopsy does not allow precise mapping of the biopsy cores within the prostate. Targeted biopsy (TB) using special devices emerged to help the physicians guide the biopsy using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). TB cores yield a higher cancer detection rate of clinically significance PCa than SB cores, but TB cores also miss a large number of clinically significant PCa that are detected by SB. Accordingly, TB is commonly performed concurrently with SB (TB+SB procedure).
This study attempts to improve TRUS-guided prostate biopsy by utilizing assistance from a novel robotic TRUS manipulator (TRUS-Robot) developed by our team. The hypothesis of the study is that clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate from the SB cores (at SB or TB+SB) can be improved above that of current devices. The objective of the study is to gain early evidence on the effectiveness of prostate biopsy assisted by the TRUS-Robot vs. a current TB device in a randomized clinical trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
483
A robotic device used to hold and manipulate the ultrasound probe during a transrectal prostate biopsy.
Uronav for prostate biopsy.
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
RECRUITINGCancer Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
Number of biopsy patients diagnosed with Gleason score \>= 7 over the total number of patients on both arms of the study.
Time frame: 5 years
Investigational device serious adverse events
Serious adverse events will be assessed according to 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 812.3(s).
Time frame: 5 years
Cancer Detection Rate of Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer
Number of biopsy patients diagnosed with Gleason score \<= 6 over the total number of patients on both arms of the study.
Time frame: 5 years
Needle targeting accuracy
Needle targeting errors will be measured as the distance between the planned core center and the inserted needle axis. Targeting accuracy will be calculated as the average of the needle targeting errors, as usual.
Time frame: 5 years
Procedure time
The time of the actual biopsy procedure measured in minutes.
Time frame: Up to 30 minutes
Sensitivity of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy
Compare biopsy pathology results with gold standard pathology on the subset of patients who follow on to radical prostatectomy. Perform binary tests (True/False x Positive/Negative) and calculate sensitivity.
Time frame: 5 years
Specificity of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy
Compare biopsy pathology results with gold standard pathology on the subset of patients who follow on to radical prostatectomy. Perform binary tests (True/False x Positive/Negative) and calculate specificity.
Time frame: 5 years
Predictive rates of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy
Compare biopsy pathology results with gold standard pathology on the subset of patients who follow on to radical prostatectomy. Perform binary tests (True/False x Positive/Negative) and calculate predictive rates.
Time frame: 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.