The objective of this long-term study is to evaluate the long term effectiveness and safety of AUGMENT® Bone Graft vs. autologous bone graft. The study involves evaluation of subjects originally treated under Protocol BMTI-2006-01. Subjects will be asked to consent and return to provide long-term follow-up data at or after 60 months (5 years) have elapsed since their original surgery as a subject in protocol BMTI-2006-01. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: The effectiveness and safety profile for AUGMENT® Bone Graft is maintained and remains comparable to that of autologous bone graft over long-term subject follow-up. REGULATORY PHASE: Post-approval study
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
150
AUGMENT® Bone Graft
Autologous Bone Graft
Tucson Orthopedic Institute
Tucson, Arizona, United States
RECRUITINGOrthoNorcal
Capitola, California, United States
RECRUITINGCalifornia Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
RECRUITINGHartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Demonstration of bridging bone via CT
Time frame: Months 60 or greater
Subject function as determined by pain on weight bearing
Time frame: Months 60 or greater
Subject function as determined by AOFAS - AHS score
Time frame: Months 60 or greater
Subject function as determined by Foot Function Index
Time frame: Months 60 or greater
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Center for Bone and Joint Surgery
Royal Palm Beach, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGIllinois Bone and Joint Institute, LLC
Glenview, Illinois, United States
RECRUITINGMedStar Health Research Institute/ Union Memorial Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
RECRUITINGOrthopaedic Associates of Michigan, PC
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
RECRUITINGMichigan Orthopedic Center
Lansing, Michigan, United States
RECRUITINGDesert Orthopaedics
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
RECRUITING...and 16 more locations