Utility of Samples in Bacteriological Prospective Series of Ulcers Leg Infected Clinically

Overview

Leg ulcers are defined as wounds lasting for more than a month. They would receive 0.2% of the population of Western countries. In Europe, the cost per episode of leg ulcers is estimated at 6650 euros (10 000 euros for a foot ulcer). The cost of treatment of wounds would be 2 to 4% of the health budget. Infection is the most common complication of chronic wounds: in most cases, it results in delayed healing, at most, it can result in amputation or serious general complications Bacterial contamination of ulcers is constant. Over time for over 25 years, various studies have shown about relatively identical results. The bacteria are present in over 90% of the etiology of venous leg ulcers. These bacteria are divided into four most common classes: Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas. The bacterial ecology changes over time. Indeed Staphylococcus aureus appears first, while the Pseudomonas is associated with ulcers lasting for several months. Anaerobic more difficult to find, are found in 30% of cases Cohabitation between leg ulcers and bacteria often without clinical consequence: These are the stages of infection and colonization. The infection is related to the proliferation of bacteria and their invasion into the skin, by increasing their virulence (virulence genes acquisition). The increase in the number of bacteria and the multiplicity of bacterial genera are one reason for the increased virulence of bacteria. When bacteria proliferate, because the host defenses are inadequate, or because there is a vascular disease which promotes the proliferation, clinical signs appear

RESEARCH PROJECT Vascular medicine at St Joseph, the management of chronic wounds concerns 80% of hospitalized patients, more than 1,000 patients per year. The reason for hospitalization of these patients outside of revascularization gestures, often performing a skin graft. The existence of an infection of the ulcer on arrival in the service is not a cons-indication for transplant, but will delay it until the signs of infection are brought under control. This scenario is common. The Medical Information department on six months, noted over 100 patients coded "leg ulcers" principal diagnosis and "soft tissue infections" secondary diagnosis. The importance of this recruitment and the lack of recommendations for the management of these patients justifies the completion of a clinical and microbiological work Until recent months, at the request of Microbiology, bacteriological referred to biopsy was performed first line when suspected of being infected ulcer. After reading the literature, and because of the invasive nature of this gesture, the evaluation of biopsy compared to the swab in a large patient population seems to necessary to the investigators The proposed work is randomized blinded for microbiological and observational part for the clinical part, on a prospective series of consecutive carriers of infected leg ulcer patients, regardless of the etiology of leg ulcers, excluding dermohypodermitis complicating acute bacterial leg ulcers, with several objectives: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Demonstrate the non-inferiority of the swab compared to biopsy in the management of patients hospitalized for infected leg ulcer two situations 1. If graft Primary endpoint: time in days between the beginning of hospitalization and the day the transplant can be performed. Indeed, the transplants are performed when the doctor determines that the infection is under control 2. If the patient is not grafted: Primary endpoint: time between the beginning of hospitalization and the end of the ideal hospitalization (when the clinician believes that the patient can get out) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES and CRITERIA healing rate of patients at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months bacteriological agreement: between the swab and biopsy Comparing the interest of biopsy compared to the swab: percentage of patients for whom the unblinding was necessary and where the biopsy was more informative than the swab (different bacteria require special treatment) . levies failure rate when the sample is sterile while the ulcer is infected clinically. The collection of demographic, etiological, nutritional profile, and the collection of various local signs can provide indicators of response to the proposed strategy. This type of study has never been done in the population of leg ulcers.