The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of a CPS parent group on outcomes for a sample of parents of children ages 3 to 5 compared to outcomes after attending a parenting group that promotes behavioral (operant) parenting. We hypothesize that guardians in the CPS group will report a better understanding of how neurocognitive skills relate to children's behaviors, greater improvements in child functioning and behavior, and greater reductions in parents' stress than those in the comparison group.
Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) is an evidence-based approach for treating children with behavioral challenges. Unlike traditional models of discipline that use power, control and incentives to facilitate compliance, CPS does not assume that a challenging child lacks motivation for compliance, but instead that the child is motivated to behave well, but simply cannot consistently do so, due to lagging skills in one or more critical neurocognitive domains, such as those related to language and communication skills, attention and working memory skills, emotion- and self-regulation skills, cognitive flexibility skills, and/or social thinking skills. The goal of the intervention is to improve these lagging neurocognitive skills by helping adults and children work toward mutually satisfactory solutions to problems, thereby enhancing flexibility and frustration tolerance in both interaction partners. Any caregiver can use CPS with any child, and CPS can be taught to mental health providers (e.g., therapists, direct care staff), educators (e.g., teachers, administrators), or parents. Common ways to teach CPS to parents include family therapy (one provider teaching one family) or in parent group training (one provider teaching six to ten parents). Although preschool-aged children have been included in past CPS-related research, they have not been studied separately, and research has not assessed the appropriateness of the current CPS approach for very young children. To address this gap in research, this study will support the development of a parent group curriculum specifically targeting guardians of preschool-aged children, as well as a randomized efficacy trial to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of a CPS parent group. Outcome measures from the CPS group will be compared with those from a group that promotes operant behavioral parenting. Approximately sixty participating guardians will be randomly assigned to attend one of two types of weekly 2-hour groups, each lasting six weeks: either a Collaborative Problem Solving group (N=30; 3 groups) or a Positive Solutions for Families group, a group routinely offered at Head Start programs (N=30; 3 groups). Participants will complete surveys prior to beginning the groups (baseline), upon completion of the group sessions (discharge), and six months after the conclusion of the groups (follow up). Results from these surveys will be compared between groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
22
CPS is an approach for understanding and reducing challenging behavior in youth. Under CPS, caregivers are taught to understand and identify the specific neurocognitive skill deficits that underlie their child's challenging behavior. Then the caregivers are taught to interact with the child in a way that solves chronic behavior problems while building the lagging neurocognitive skills to avoid future problems.
Positive Solutions for Families groups provide information for families on how to promote children's social and emotional skills, understand their problem behavior, and use positive approaches to help children learn appropriate behavior.
Feasibility of a CPS group for parents of preschool-age children
Therapy Attitude Inventory (The TAI is a self-report questionnaire that we will use to measure satisfaction with the parenting groups. We will compare the scores on this measure between the two groups.)
Time frame: 6 months (immediately after group and 6 months after the group)
Impact of parenting groups on parenting style
Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (Measures parenting philosophy and includes scores for authoritative style, authoritarian style, and permissive style.)
Time frame: 8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)
Impact of parenting groups on parent emotion regulation
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (Measures emotion regulation skills including nonacceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity.)
Time frame: 8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)
Impact of parenting groups on the parent child relationship
Parent Child Relationship Inventory (Measures how parents view the task of parenting and how they feel about their children. Measures parental support, satisfaction with parenting, communication, limit setting, parent response consistency, and parent social desirability.)
Time frame: 8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)
Impact of parenting groups on the parent philosophy
Think:Kids Measure of Change Over Time (Measures perceptions of parent-child relationship quality, parenting philosophy, and predictability of youth's challenging behavior.)
Time frame: 8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)
Acceptability of a CPS group for parents of preschool-age children
Qualitative interviews at each time point
Time frame: 8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)
Parent satisfaction with a CPS group for preschool-aged children
Qualitative interviews at each time point
Time frame: 8 months (changes from baseline, immediately after group, and 6 months after the group)
Parent satisfaction with a CPS group for preschool-aged children
Quantitative parent report of group acceptability at the conclusion of the groups
Time frame: 8 weeks (immediately after conclusion of group)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.