The purpose of this randomized, actively controlled, double-blind study with prospective data collection was to assess differences between sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in increasing exercise capacity and non-sedentary physical activity in HFrEF patients. Physical activity was assessed by the 6 minute walk test, and daily physical activity was continuously measured by means of a wrist-worn accelerometry device from 2 weeks before until 12 weeks after start of study therapy (sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
621
LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) was available in 24 mg/26 mg, 49 mg/51 and 97 mg/103 mg mg film-coated tablets
Placebo of LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) was available to match 24 mg/26 mg, 49 mg/51 and 97 mg/103 mg mg film-coated tablets
Enalapril was available in 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg film-coated tablets
Placebo of Enalapril was available to match 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg film-coated tablets
Novartis Investigative Site
Edegem, Antwerpen, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Dendermonde, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Geel, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Turnhout, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Change From Baseline (Week 0) in the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at End of Study (Week 12)
The impact of LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan) and Enalapril on functional exercise capacity was measured by the Six Minute Walk Test at 12 weeks. The 6MWT measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is able to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline (Week 0) in Mean Daily Non-sedentary Daytime Activity at End of Study (Week 12)
Non-sedentary physical activity is defined as \>= 178.50 activity counts per minute; the average number of minutes per day spent in non-sedentary physical activity is being calculated over 14 days before randomization (baseline i.e. week -2 to week 0) and the last 14 days of treatment (i.e. week 10 to week 12).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number and Percentage of Participants With Improved Performance (>= 30 m) in the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) - FAS
The proportion of patients with improved performance (\>= 30 meters) in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) was assessed by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number and Percentage of Participants With Improved Performance (>= 30 m) in the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) - FAS Subset Without AE/SAE
The proportion of patients with improved performance (\>= 30 meters) in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) was assessed by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number and Percentage of Participants With Improved Performance (>= 30 m) in the 6MWT Which Walked Equal to or Less Than 300 Meters at Baseline - FAS
The proportion of patients with improved performance (\>= 30 meters) in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) was assessed by treatment group in a subset of patients with baseline six-minute walk distance equal to or less than 300 meters.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number and Percentage of Participants With Improved Performance (>= 30 m) in the 6MWT Which Walked Equal to or Less Than 300 Meters at Baseline - FAS Subset Without AE/SAE
The proportion of patients with improved performance (\>= 30 meters) in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) was assessed by treatment group in a subset of patients with baseline six-minute walk distance equal to or less than 300 meters.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number and Percentage of Participants With Improved Performance (>= 30 m) in the 6MWT Which Walked 100-450 Meters at Baseline - FAS
The proportion of patients with improved performance (\>= 30 meters) in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) was assessed by treatment group in a subset of patients with baseline six-minute walk distance from 100 to 450 meters.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number and Percentage of Participants With Improved Performance (>= 30 m) in the 6MWT Which Walked 100-450 Meters at Baseline - FAS Subset Without AE/SAE
The proportion of patients with improved performance (\>= 30 meters) in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) was assessed by treatment group in a subset of patients with baseline six-minute walk distance from 100 to 450 meters.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline (Week 0) in the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Weeks 4 and 8
The impact of LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan) and Enalapril on functional exercise capacity was measured by the Six Minute Walk Test at Weeks 4 and 8. The 6MWT measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is able to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8
Number and Percentage of Participants Who Show Increased Levels (>= 10% Increase) of Non Sedentary Daytime Physical Activity at Week 12 Compared to Baseline
Non-sedentary physical activity is defined as \>= 178.50 activity counts per minute; the average number of minutes per day spent in non-sedentary physical activity will be calculated over 14 days before randomization (baseline) and the last 14 days of treatment (i.e week 10 to week 12)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number and Percentage of Participants Achieving PGA Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The Patient Global Assessment (PGA) is a self-reported tool to assess the patients' subjective rating of their disease activity widely used in HF research. The patients are asked to report functioning or response to an intervention by rating their current condition compared to their pre-intervention condition on a numerical scale: 1) much improved 2) moderately improved 3) a little improved 4) unchanged 5) a little worse 6) moderately worse or 7) much worse.
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Number and Percentage of Participants With Improved Symptoms of Heart Failure as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
The Patient Global Assessment (PGA) is a self-reported tool to assess the patients' subjective rating of their disease activity widely used in HF research. The patients are asked to report functioning or response to an intervention by rating their current condition compared to their pre-intervention condition on a numerical scale: 1) much improved 2) moderately improved 3) a little improved 4) unchanged 5) a little worse 6) moderately worse or 7) much worse. Patients with improved symptoms were categorized as: Improvement, Is unchanged, Gets worse or Missing.
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Non-sedentary Daytime Activity in Weekly Intervals
Non-sedentary physical activity is defined as \>= 178.50 activity counts per minute; Mean daily non-sedentary daytime physical activity were being calculated over weekly and compared to before the inclusion.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Non-sedentary Daytime Activity in Two-weekly Intervals
Non-sedentary physical activity is defined as \>= 178.50 activity counts per minute; Mean daily non-sedentary daytime physical activity were being calculated over two-weekly intervals and compared to before the inclusion.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 0 to 2, Weeks 2 to 4, Weeks 4 to 6, Weeks 6 to 8, Weeks 8 to 10, Weeks 10 to 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Light Non-sedentary Daytime Physical Activity
The average number of minutes per day spent in light non-sedentary physical activity was being calculated over 7 day epochs. Non-sedentary physical activity is defined as \>= 178.5 activity counts per minute and light physical activity is defined as 178.5 - 565.5 counts per minute.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Moderate-to-Vigorous Non-sedentary Daytime Physical Activity
The average number of minutes per day spent in moderate to vigorous non-sedentary physical activity was being calculated over 7 day epochs. Non-sedentary physical activity is defined as \>= 178.5 activity counts per minute and moderate-to-vigorous activity is defined as \> 565.5 counts per minute.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12
Total Weekly Time Spent in Non-sedentary Daytime Physical Activity
Non-sedentary physical activity is defined as \>= 178.5 activity counts per minute; The total time spent in non-sedentary physical activity was being calculated for each patient in weekly intervals and the temporal course for each patient was assessed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12
Total Weekly Time Spent in Light Non-sedentary Daytime Physical Activity
Light non-sedentary daytime physical activity is defined as between 178.5 - 565.5 counts per minute; The time spent in light non-sedentary physical activity was being calculated for each patient in weekly intervals and the temporal course for each patient was assessed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12
Total Weekly Time Spent in Moderate-to-Vigorous Non-sedentary Daytime Physical Activity
Moderate-to-vigorous non-sedentary physical activity is defined as \> 565.5 counts per minute. The total time spent in moderate-to-vigorous non-sedentary physical activity was being calculated for each patient in weekly intervals and the temporal course for each patient was assessed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Peak Six Minutes of Daytime Physical Activity
The peak 6 min walk (M6min) is a parameter derived by validated algorithms of the software that are used to preprocess actigraphy data. The parameter reflected the peak 6 minutes of day time physical activity. The mean daily 6-minute walking test was being calculated over 14 day intervals.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 and Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Pleven, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, Bulgaria
...and 109 more locations