This pilot phase II trial studies how well rituximab and latent membrane protein (LMP)-specific T-cells work in treating pediatric solid organ recipients with Epstein-Barr virus-positive, cluster of differentiation (CD)20-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. LMP-specific T-cells are special immune system cells trained to recognize proteins found on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder tumor cells if they are infected with Epstein-Barr virus. Giving rituximab and LMP-specific T-cells may work better in treating pediatric organ recipients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder than rituximab alone.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the feasibility of treating pediatric and young adult solid organ transplant recipients who have newly diagnosed, relapsed or refractory Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive CD20-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) with a novel T-cell therapeutic, allogeneic LMP1/LMP2-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (third party latent membrane protein \[(LMP\]-)\]-specific T cells), in a cooperative group setting. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the percentage of eligible patients for whom a suitable LMP-specific T-cell product derived from a third party LMP-specific T-cell bank is available. II. To estimate the response rate (RR) to three doses of rituximab (RTX) as single agent in children and young adults with newly diagnosed or relapsed EBV-positive CD20-positive PTLD after solid organ transplantation (SOT). III. To estimate the 2-year event-free survival (EFS) of children and young adults with newly diagnosed, refractory or relapsed EBV-positive CD20-positive PTLD after SOT treated with RTX and/or LMP-specific T cells. IV. To estimate overall survival (OS) of children and young adults with newly diagnosed, refractory or relapsed EBV-positive CD20-positive PTLD after SOT treated with RTX and/or LMP-specific T cells. V. To estimate the RR to LMP-specific T cells of newly diagnosed (without complete response to course RTX1), refractory, and relapsed children and young adults with EBV-positive CD20-positive PTLD. VI. To estimate progression-free survival (PFS) of children and young adults with newly diagnosed, refractory or relapsed EBV-positive CD20-positive PTLD after SOT treated with RTX and/or LMP-specific T cells. VII. To describe the toxicity of third party LMP-specific T cells in children and young adults with newly diagnosed, refractory or relapsed EBV-positive CD20-positive PTLD after SOT treated with RTX and/or LMP-specific T cells. VIII. To validate that absence of EBV viremia correlates with RR, EFS and OS. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether third party LMP-specific T cells promote autologous immune reconstitution of EBV-specific T cells. II. To determine whether EBV viremia is inversely correlated with an increase in EBV-specific T cells in vivo. III. To determine whether plasma cytokine profile and changes in cytokines over time correlate with treatment response or toxicity (e.g. cytokine release syndrome). OUTLINE: INDUCTION (Cohorts A and B): Patients receive rituximab or biosimilar intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8, 15. Cycle continues for up to 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I (RTX, Cohorts A): Patients with newly diagnosed PTLD who achieve a complete response (CR) after induction receive additional rituximab or biosimilar as in induction. ARM II (LMP-TC, Cohorts A, B, C): Patients with newly diagnosed PTLD who do not achieve a CR to induction, all relapsed patients after induction, and all patients with refractory disease who received rituximab or biosimilar within 90 days according to institutional guidelines, receive allogeneic LMP1/LMP2-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes IV over 1- 2 minutes on days 0 and 7. Cycle continues for up to 42 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with PR or SD after first cycle of cycle allogeneic LMP1/LMP2-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes receive an additional course. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
18
Given IV
Given IV
Children's Hospital of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Phoenix Childrens Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, United States
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Percentage of Patients Assigned to Arm Latent Membrane Protein-specific T-cells (LMP-TC) With Successful LMP-specific T Cell Product Match, Were Treated Within Two Weeks of the Expected Start Date, and Received Both Weekly Doses
The percentage of patients assigned to Arm LMP-TC who had a suitable LMP-specific T-cell product, were treated within two weeks of the expected start date, and received both weekly doses in a cooperative multi-institutional setting. A statistical analysis was planned, but not performed because accrual was stopped early and the sample size required for the analysis was not reached.
Time frame: Day 8 of the first LMP-TC cycle (cycle = 42 days)
Percentage of Patients Successfully Matched to a Latent Membrane Protein (LMP)-Specific T Cell Product Derived From a Third Party LMP-specific T Cell Bank
Will be assessed using an exact one-sided binomial 95% confidence interval to get a lower bound for the actual rate.
Time frame: Day 1 of the first LMP-TC cycle (cycle = 42 days)
Progression-free Survival
Will be assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, for all patients combined and separately for each cohort.
Time frame: Time to first occurrence of progression or death (events) or loss to follow-up or survival to analysis date (non-events), assessed 12 months from enrollment of the last patient on the study
Event-free Survival (EFS)
Will be assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, for all patients combined and separately for each cohort.
Time frame: Time to first occurrence of progression or death (events) or loss to follow-up or survival to analysis date (non-events), assessed 12 months from enrollment of the last patient on the study
Overall Survival (OS)
Will be assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, for all patients combined and separately for each cohort.
Time frame: Time to first occurrence of progression or death (events) or loss to follow-up or survival to analysis date (non-events), assessed 12 months from enrollment of the last patient on the study
Response Rate (RR) to Rituximab
Will be assessed using exact two-sided binomial 95% confidence intervals to get estimates of the response rate. Will be evaluated in Cohorts A and B only (combined and separately).
Time frame: Up to week 3
Response Rate (RR) to LMP-specific T Cells
Will be assessed using exact two-sided binomial 95% confidence intervals to get estimates of the response rate. Will be evaluated in all Cohorts combined and in each Cohort separately.
Time frame: Up to week 6
Absence of Epstein-Barr Virus Viremia
Will be correlated with response rate (RR), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Using the log-rank test for EFS and OS and the exact conditional test of proportions (Fisher's exact test for RR, both for all patients combined and stratified by cohort.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Incidence of Adverse Events
Will be assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Toxicities will be described using descriptive statistics. Toxicity monitoring and analysis will be performed based on "as treated".
Time frame: Up to 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
UCSF Medical Center-Mission Bay
San Francisco, California, United States
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
UF Health Cancer Institute - Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, United States
...and 28 more locations