In this study we want to compare a dental diagnose during face to face consultation vs remote consultation with telemedicine device.
Using Soprocare® camera, videos of patients' oral cavity are recorded and analysed remotely. 200 patients have been included: 100 in Montpellier (France) and 100 in Kitakyushu (Japan). A classical face-to-face oral consultation is realized using ICDAS II classification. Then a student recorded 6 videos of patients' mouth: one video by sector, showing each face of molars and premolars in cario fluorescence mode of Soprocare® and one video of the maxillary and mandibular incisor-canine block in perio mode. In a third step, a remote dentist analysed videos and made a telediagnosis using the same classification. Dental hygiene and missing teeth are also noted in classical and tele diagnostic. The direct and the tele diagnostic are compared.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
200
Determine the interest of teleconsultation in dentistry tool for the diagnosis of caries. Ie whether oral teleconsultations are of the same quality as conventional consultations for the diagnosis of caries ..
diagnostic of caries
Teleconsultation will be made using a specific camera SoproCare®6, the company Acteon ..
Time frame: 1 day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.