The study will be a single-center, randomized Phase II study of conventional TACE in combination with sorafenib, given either continuously or sequentially, in patients with unresectable HCC. The primary variables will be tumor response (by MR Imaging) and plasma VEGF levels, prior to and after cTACE.
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely performed procedure for patients with unresectable HCC. Although TACE can induce tumor necrosis, tumor recurrence and metastasis is not uncommon and likely due to stimulation of angiogenesis immediately after TACE. Plasma VEGF levels are significantly elevated following TACE procedures, usually peaking 24 to 48 hours after treatment. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has been shown to increase survival in patients with advanced HCC, presumably due to its predominant and strong antiangiogenic activities thereby preventing tumor growth. However, despite its targeted approach, sorafenib is not without toxicities; consequently most patients are unable to remain on full dose throughout the course of their treatment. Because of sorafenib's antiangiogenic properties, it has been suggested that sorafenib could be used in combination with TACE to counteract the post-TACE angiogenic release and therefore prevent or minimize the risk of tumor recurrence. The possible synergy between TACE and sorafenib has been tested in numerous clinical studies. Although the safety profile has been clearly established, the efficacy of this combination therapy has yet to be demonstrated. Several combination methods have been tested, i.e., continuously where sorafenib is administered before the first TACE and then continuously throughout the planned TACE treatments, or sequentially where sorafenib is administered after the completion of TACE (usually 4 days after). Here, the investigators postulate that the sequence of the combination could have a significant impact on patient outcomes. Specifically, the investigators hypothesize that the continuous method is superior to that of the sequential protocol because the presence of sorafenib before the first TACE will preempt the peak of angiogenesis from TACE. To that end, the investigators propose to measure VEGF levels serially in order to detect differences between the two methods.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Patients assigned to Group A will begin sorafenib on a continuous schedule starting at 400mg BID from Cycle 1 Day 1, one week prior to cTACE treatment on Cycle 1 Day 8. After week 6, cTACE will be provided on demand (as needed, up to 4 treatments total in the first 4 cycles) at week 2 in subsequent cycles, and sorafenib will continue to be administered. Patients will be allowed to undergo dose adjustments of sorafenib as long as it remains above the ¼ dose (400mg QOD).
Patients assigned to Group B will undergo cTACE up to 4 treatments within the first 4 cycles as needed prior to starting sorafenib. After it is determined that no further TACE treatment is necessary (via imaging and clinical assessment on follow-up), administration of sorafenib will begin on Day 1 of the following cycle. Dosing will begin at 400mg BID and maintained continuously provided no unmanageable toxicities develop, with follow-up assessments performed on week 6 of every 1-2 cycles as needed. Patients in Group B will also be allowed to undergo dose adjustments of sorafenib as long as it remains above the ¼ dose (400mg QOD).
Smilow Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Tumor Response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
RECIST criteria for tumor response: * Complete response - complete disappearance of all target lesions * Partial response - at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. * Stable disease - all other cases. * Progressive disease - at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Time frame: 54 weeks
Tumor Response using mREcist if applicable
mRECIST criteria for tumor response: * Complete response -disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. * Partial response - at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. * Stable disease - Any cases that do not qualify for either partial response or progressive disease. * Progressive disease - An increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions recorded since treatment started.
Time frame: 54 weeks
EASL criteria for tumor response
* Complete response - Complete disappearance of all viable tumoral area and no new lesions. No new lesions may evolve during a 4 week period after initial documentation of response. * Partial response - Greater than 50% reduction in viable tumoral area of all measurable lesions via uptake of contrast. * Stable disease - All other cases. * Progressive disease - Greater than or equal to 25% increase in tumoral area of one or more measurable lesions or the appearance of new lesions.
Time frame: 54 weeks
Laboratory Evaluations: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Correlations
Plasma VEGF levels will be compared between the two study arms. VEGF-A, as well as VEGF-R1 and R2 concentrations will be obtained. VEGF concentrations will also be correlated with tumor response of target lesions as determined by imaging assessments, and with overall survival.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: baseline and 54 Weeks
Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS) will be measured from the initiation of therapy until the date of death. OS will be assessed for patients treated with continuous sorafenib and cTACE and compared to those treated with sequential cTACE and sorafenib.
Time frame: 54 weeks