This study will examine the benefits of a monitored physical activity program for participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using a wearable activity device (e.g.fitbit). The goals of this pilot study are to examine 1) whether an incentive is better than no incentive in maintaining an increased level of physical activity and 2) the benefits of physical activity on patient reported disease activity in inflammatory arthritis.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are chronic, systemic inflammatory disorders affecting 1-2% of the US population. Ongoing chronic inflammation and lack of exercise due to arthritis are each associated with pain, fatigue, depression, muscle loss, obesity, and development of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, all of which impact physical functioning and quality of life. Increases in physical activity can significantly impact each one of these outcomes and are likely to positively impact a patients experience of their disease. This study will examine the benefits of a monitored physical activity program. This study will use a wearable activity device (e.g. fitbit) to monitor step counts and will incentivize one group to achieve higher step counts than the control group. The primary goal of this pilot study will be to determine whether one incentive (loss aversion) is better than no incentive in increasing step counts and maintaining an increased level of physical activity. Additional outcomes of interest are patient reported disease activity (using the RAPID3 patient reported outcome) and physician measured disease activity, quality of life assessments and weight loss.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
71
Both groups will receive fitbits to track their physical activity, however one arm of the study may receive additional incentives to achieve their step count goal.
Hospital at the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Percentage of Days Goal Met
The primary outcome will be percent of days meeting goal during the intervention period
Time frame: 12 Weeks
RAPID3
Comparison of RAPID3 score and amount of physical activity
Time frame: 26 Weeks
Psoriasis
Physician-assessed psoriasis severity as measured by body surface area (BSA) involved in patients with concurrent psoriasis.
Time frame: 26 Weeks
Patient Feedback
Patient feedback as determined by qualitative surveys taken at Week 14 and Week 26
Time frame: 14 Weeks and 26 Weeks
Sleep Disturbance and Fatigue
Changes in sleep disturbance and fatigue as determined by PROMIS forms.
Time frame: 26 Weeks
Completion of Activities by Study Participants (Feasibility)
Percentage completion of study activities (weekly questionnaires and transmission of activity into Epic
Time frame: 26 Weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.