Efficacy and Safety of Burosumab Versus Oral Phosphate and Active Vitamin D Treatment in Pediatric Patients With XLH

Kyowa Kirin, Inc.61 enrolled

Overview

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of KRN23 (burosumab) therapy in improving rickets in children with XLH compared with active control (oral phosphate/active vitamin D).

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

X-Linked Hypophosphatemia

Interventions

burosumabBIOLOGICAL

solution for subcutaneous (SC) injection

Oral Phosphate SupplementDRUG

oral tablet; oral solution; oral powder

active vitamin DDRUG

tablet, oral solution

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 1 YearMax age: 12 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female, aged 1 to ≤12 years with radiographic evidence of rickets as determined by central readers 2. Phosphate-regulating endopeptidase homolog, X-linked (PHEX) mutation or variant of uncertain significance in either the patient or in a directly related family member with appropriate X-linked inheritance 3. Biochemical findings associated with XLH: serum phosphorus \<3.0 mg/dL (\<0.97 mmol/L) 4. Serum creatinine below the age-adjusted upper limit of normal 5. Serum 25(OH)D above the lower limit of normal (≥16 ng/mL) at the Screening Visit 6. Have received both oral phosphate and active vitamin D therapy for ≥ 12 consecutive months (for children ≥3 years of age) or ≥ 6 consecutive months (for children \<3 years of age) 7 days prior to the Randomization Visit 7. Willing to provide access to prior medical records for the collection of historical growth and radiographic data and disease history 8. Provide written or verbal assent (as appropriate for the subject and region) and written informed consent by a legally authorized representative after the nature of the study has been explained, and prior to any research-related procedures. 9. Must, in the opinion of the investigator, be willing and able to complete all aspects of the study, adhere to the study visit schedule and comply with the assessments 10. Females who have reached menarche must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and undergo additional pregnancy testing during the study. Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use a highly effective method of contraception for the duration of the study plus 12 weeks after stopping the study drug. Sexually active male subjects with female partners of childbearing potential must consent to use a condom with spermicide or a highly effective method of contraception for the duration of the study plus 12 weeks after stopping the study drug Exclusion Criteria: 1. Tanner stage 4 or higher in any of the following: genitals, breast, or pubic hair, based on physical examination 2. Height percentile \> 50th based on country-specific norms 3. Use of aluminum hydroxide antacids (eg, Maalox® and Mylanta®), systemic corticosteroids, acetazolamide, and thiazides within 7 days prior to the Screening Visit 4. Current or prior use of leuprorelin (eg, Lupron®, Viadur®, Eligard®), triptorelin (TRELSTAR®), goserelin (Zoladex®), or other drugs known to delay puberty 5. Use of growth hormone therapy within 12 months before the Screening Visit 6. Presence of nephrocalcinosis on renal ultrasound grade 4 7. Planned orthopedic surgery, including osteotomy or implantation or removal of staples, 8 plates, or any other hardware, within the first 40 weeks of the study 8. Hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia, defined as serum calcium levels outside the age-adjusted normal limits 9. Evidence of hyperparathyroidism (parathyroid hormone \[PTH\] levels 2.5X upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) 10. Use of medication to suppress PTH (eg, cinacalcet, calcimimetics) within 2 months prior to the Screening Visit 11. Presence or history of any condition that, in the view of the investigator, places the subject at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study. 12. Presence of a concurrent disease or condition that would interfere with study participation or affect safety 13. History of recurrent infection or predisposition to infection, or of known immunodeficiency 14. Use of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody within 90 days prior to the Screening Visit or history of allergic or anaphylactic reactions to any monoclonal antibody 15. Presence or history of any hypersensitivity to KRN23 excipients that, in the judgment of the investigator, places the subject at increased risk for adverse effects 16. Use of any investigational product or investigational medical device within 30 days prior to screening, or requirement for any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments. OR, in Japan, use of any investigational product or investigational medical device within 4 months prior to screening, or requirement for any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments

Locations (16)

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

UCSF

San Francisco, California, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Radiographic Global Impression of Change (RGI-C) Global Score at Week 40

Changes in the severity of rickets and bowing were assessed using a disease specific qualitative RGI-C scoring system. The RGI-C is a 7-point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing of rickets), +2 = much better (substantial healing of rickets), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing of rickets), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening of rickets), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening of rickets), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening of rickets).

Time frame: Week 40

Secondary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants With a Mean RGI-C Global Score ≥ +2.0 (Responders) at Week 40

RGI-C responders are defined as participants with a mean RGI-C global score \>= +2.0. The RGI-C is a 7-point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing of rickets), +2 = much better (substantial healing of rickets), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing of rickets), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening of rickets), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening of rickets), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening of rickets).

Time frame: Week 40

Percentage of Participants With a Mean RGI-C Global Score ≥ +2.0 (Responders) at Week 64

Time frame: Week 64

RGI-C Global Score at Week 64

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Indiana University School of Medicine

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Shriners Hospital For Children

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Vanderbilt Children's Hospital

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

The Children's Hospital at Westmead

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Shriners Hospital for Children - Canada

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Kanagawa Children's Medical Center

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

...and 6 more locations

Change From Baseline in RSS Total Score at Week 40

The RSS system is a 10-point radiographic scoring method that was developed to assess the severity of nutritional rickets in the wrists and knees based on the degree of metaphyseal fraying, cupping, lucency, separation, and the proportion of the growth plate affected. Scores are assigned for the unilateral wrist and knee X-rays deemed by the rater to be the more severe of the bilateral images. The maximum total score on the RSS is 10 points and the minimum score is 0, with a total possible score of 4 points for the wrists and 6 points for the knees (the total score is the sum of the wrist and knee score). Higher scores indicate greater rickets severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 40

Change From Baseline in RSS Total Score at Week 64

The RSS system is a 10-point radiographic scoring method that was developed to assess the severity of nutritional rickets in the wrists and knees based on the degree of metaphyseal fraying, cupping, and the proportion of the growth plate affected. Scores are assigned for the unilateral wrist and knee X-rays deemed by the rater to be the more severe of the bilateral images. The maximum total score on the RSS is 10 points and the minimum score is 0, with a total possible score of 4 points for the wrists and 6 points for the knees. Higher scores indicate greater rickets severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

RGI-C Long Leg Score at Week 40

Changes in the severity of lower extremity skeletal abnormalities, including genu varum and genu valgus, were assessed using a disease specific qualitative RGI-C scoring system. The RGI-C is a 7-point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing), +2 = much better (substantial healing), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening).

Time frame: Week 40

RGI-C Long Leg Score at Week 64

Time frame: Week 64

Change From Baseline in Height-For-Age Z-Scores to Week 40

Recumbent length/Standing height z scores are measures of height adjusted for a child's age and sex. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population (from the Centers for Disease Control \[CDC\] growth charts) in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z-scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 40

Change From Baseline in Height-For-Age Z-Scores to Week 64

Recumbent length/Standing height z scores are measures of height adjusted for a child's age and sex. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population (from the CDC growth charts) in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z-scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Change in Growth Velocity Z Score From Baseline to Week 40

A growth velocity Z score was calculated based on Tanner's standard. The Z score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population (from Tanner's standard) in the same age range and with the same sex. The baseline growth velocity was calculated for participants who had data available from within 1.5 years prior to baseline. The Week 64 growth velocity was calculated using data between baseline and Week 64. The mid-point of the age interval was used to locate the closest reference age provided by Tanner's Standard. Children with a mid-point age under 2.25 years were excluded, because younger ages are not available in Tanner's standard. To smoothly transition from recumbent length to standing height, 0·8 cm was subtracted from recumbent length before pooling with standing height. A Z score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 40

Change in Growth Velocity Z Score From Baseline to Week 64

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum Phosphorus Concentration, up to Week 64

The GEE model includes change from baseline for serum phosphorous measurement as the dependent variable, treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment group by visit, baseline age and baseline RSS stratification as factors, baseline phosphorous measure as a covariate, with exchangeable covariance structure. The GEE model included data up to Week 64.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 33, 40, 52, 64

Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum Phosphorus Concentration, Weeks 66-112

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 66, 68, 76, 88, 100, 112

Change From Baseline in Mean Post-Baseline Serum Phosphorus Level to Week 64

The ANCOVA model includes change in serum phosphorus from baseline to mean post-baseline as the dependent variable, treatment group, baseline age and baseline RSS stratification as factors, baseline phosphorous measure as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52, 64

Change From Baseline in Mean Post-Baseline Serum Phosphorus Level to Week 140 (During Treatment With Burosumab)

Time frame: Burosumab arm: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52, 64, 66, 68, 76, 88, 100, 112, 124, 140; Active Control arm: Baseline, Week 68, 76, 88, 100, 112, 124, 140

Percentage of Participants Reaching the Normal Range of Serum Phosphorus Concentration (3.2 - 6.1 mg/dL)

Time frame: Burosumab arm: Baseline, up to Week 140; Active Control arm: Baseline, Week 68 up to Week 140

Change From Baseline Over Time in 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D, up to Week 64

The GEE model includes change from baseline for 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D measurement as the dependent variable, treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment group by visit, baseline age and baseline RSS stratification as factors, baseline 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D measure as a covariate, with exchangeable covariance structure. The GEE model included data up to Week 64.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 33, 40, 52, 64

Change From Baseline Over Time in 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D, Weeks 68 to 112

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 68, 76, 88, 100, 112

Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFR, up to Week 64

Serum phosphorus and TRP measurements were used in the calculation of TmP/GFR. The GEE model includes change from baseline for TmP/GFR measurement as the dependent variable, treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment group by visit, baseline age and baseline RSS stratification as factors, baseline TmP/GFR measure as a covariate, with exchangeable covariance structure. The GEE model included data up to Week 64.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52, 64

Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFR, Week 68 to 112

Serum phosphorus and TRP measurements were used in the calculation of TmP/GFR.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 68, 76, 88, 112

Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum ALP, up to Week 64

The GEE model includes change from baseline for ALP measurement as the dependent variable, treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment group by visit, baseline age and baseline RSS stratification as factors, baseline ALP measure as a covariate, with exchangeable covariance structure. The GEE model included data up to Week 64.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 24, 40, 52, 64

Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum ALP, Week 68 to 112

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 68, 76, 88, 100, 112

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum ALP, up to Week 112

Decreases indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 24, 40, 52, 64, 68, 76, 88, 100, 112

Change From Baseline in the PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference, Physical Function Mobility and Fatigue Domain Scores (For Participants ≥ 5 Years of Age at the Screening Visit) at Week 40

The PROMIS was developed by the National Institutes of Health and uses domain-specific measures to assess patient well-being (Broderick et al. 2013), (NIH 2015). It uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. For the Pain Interference Domain, decreases indicate less pain, for the Physical Function Mobility Domain, increases indicate greater mobility and for the Fatigue Domain, decreases indicate less fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 40

Change From Baseline in the PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference, Physical Function Mobility and Fatigue Domain Scores (For Participants ≥ 5 Years of Age at the Screening Visit) at Week 64

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Change From Baseline in the FPS-R (For Participants ≥ 5 Years of Age at the Screening Visit) at Week 40

The FPS-R is a dimensionless 10 point Likert scale used to assess self-reported pain intensity on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most pain you can imagine). Greater pain scores are indicative of more severe pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 40

Change From Baseline in the FPS-R (For Participants ≥ 5 Years of Age at the Screening Visit) at Week 64

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Change From Baseline in the 6MWT Total Distance at Week 40

The total distance walked (meters) in a 6-minute period was measured in participants ≥ 5 years of age at the Screening Visit who were able to complete the test.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 40

Change From Baseline in the 6MWT Total Distance at Week 64

The total distance walked (meters) in a 6-minute period was measured in participants ≥ 5 years of age at the Screening Visit who were able to complete the test.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Percent of Predicted Normal in the 6MWT Total Distance at Week 40

The total distance walked (meters) in a 6-minute period was measured in participants ≥ 5 years of age at the Screening Visit who were able to complete the test, and the percent predicted distance based on normative data for age and gender was estimated.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 40

Percent of Predicted Normal in the 6MWT Total Distance at Week 64

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64