This is an open-label, randomized, active comparator, multicenter, international Phase 3 study of NKTR-102 versus TPC in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have stable brain metastases and have been previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting (prior anthracycline may be omitted if medically appropriate or contraindicated for the patient).
This is an open-label, randomized, active comparator, multicenter, international Phase 3 study of NKTR-102 versus TPC in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have stable brain metastases and have been previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting (prior anthracycline may be omitted if medically appropriate or contraindicated for the patient). In Group A, NKTR-102 will be administered at a dose level of 145 mg/m2 on a q21d schedule as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each treatment cycle. In Group B, TPC will be administered per standard of care. Patients randomized to TPC will receive single-agent IV chemotherapy, limited to choice of one of the following 7 agents: eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, or nab-paclitaxel. This study will randomize approximately 220 patients using a 1:1 randomization ratio and stratification based on geographic region, tumor receptor status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status. At Screening, the Investigator must determine which TPC will be offered to the patient. Data will be collected on subsequent anticancer therapies in both treatment groups from the time patients come off the study treatment until the time of primary data analysis for Overall Survival (OS). An independent data monitoring committee (DMC) will assess interim safety and efficacy data and determine final number of death events needed to provide 80% conditional power based on the zone adaptive design.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
178
Investigator Site - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Investigator Site - Orange
Orange, California, United States
Investigator Site - San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Investigator Site - Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Investigator Site - Plantation
Plantation, Florida, United States
Overall Survival (OS) of Patients
To compare Overall Survival (OS) of patients who receive 145 mg/m2 NKTR-102 given once every 21 days (q21d) with OS of patients who receive Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC). Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Patients will be followed until their date of death or until final database closure. Patients who are lost-to-follow-up or are alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the time they were last known to be alive or at the date of event cut-off for OS analysis.
Time frame: Within 3 years from study start
Progression-Free Survival (Outside the Central Nervous System)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest evidence of documented Progressive Disease (PD) or of death from any cause. The date of global deterioration or symptomatic deterioration will not be used as the date of PD. The assessment of PFS outside the CNS will utilize RECIST criteria v1.1.
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected average of 1 year
Progression-Free Survival in Brain Metastasis (PFS-BM)
Progression-Free Survival in Brain Metastasis (PFS-BM) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest evidence of documented Progressive Disease (PD) per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) in brain metastases or death from any cause. The PD will also be determined by the investigator's assessments. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of CNS target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. This included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, at least 1 lesion had to increase by an absolute value of 5 mm or more to be considered progression.
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected average of 1 year
Progression-Free Survival (Overall)
Progression-free survival (CNS and peripheral) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest evidence of documented PD in either the CNS or peripheral (using RANO-BM) or death from any cause. The PD will be determined by both the investigator's and the central imaging facility assessments. The same statistical methods that were used for PFS and PFS-BM will be used for PFS (Overall). Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of CNS target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. This included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, at least 1 lesion had to increase by an absolute value of 5 mm or more to be considered progression.
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected average of 1 year
Objective Response Rates (ORR) of the NKTR-102 Treatment and the Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC)
RECIST criteria for lesions outside the Central Nervous System (CNS); RANO-BM criteria for CNS lesions) based upon the best response as assessed by the central imaging facility. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR is calculated as the sum of CR and PR. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). Stable Disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected average of 1 year
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Clinical Benefit Rate will be defined as the proportion of patients having a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for at least 4 months (≥ 120 days). CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions for at least 4 weeks with no new lesions, not use of corticosteroids, and patient was stable or improved clinically. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters sustained for at least 4 weeks, no new lesions; stable to decreased corticosteroid dose; stable or improved clinically. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). Stable Disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time frame: For at least 4 months, with an expected average of 1 year
Duration of Response (DoR)
Duration of response (DoR) outside the CNS will be defined as the time from first documented CR or PR until the earliest evidence of disease progression per RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions for at least 4 weeks with no new lesions, not use of corticosteroids, and patient was stable or improved clinically. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters sustained for at least 4 weeks, no new lesions; stable to decreased corticosteroid dose; stable or improved clinically. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). Stable Disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected average of 1 year
Compare Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Using the European Organisation for Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Module With the Brain Neoplasms 20-question (BN-20) Subscale.
The EORTC QLQ-BN20 Scale has a series of 20 questions each of which involve reporting a scale from 1-4. It is an increasing scale where a score of one indicates "not at all" while a score of four indicates "very much". The minimum score is 20 and the maximum score is 80. The higher the score the worse the outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study treatment in Cycle 1 [cycle length = 21 for NKTR-102 or 28 days for TPC] and end of Cycle 44.
Compare Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Using the the EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D-5L™)
The EQ-5D-5L scale is used to measure health by having a patient answer a series of questions. There are a series of 5 questions each of which is scaled from a score of 4-20 in increasing increments of 4. The scale is numbered from 0 to 100 where 100 means the beast health you can imagine and 0 means the worst health.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study treatment in Cycle 1 [cycle length = 21 for NKTR-102 or 28 days for TPC] and end of Cycle 44
Compare Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
The Brief Fatigue Inventory scale utilizes a series of 4 questions. The first three are scored with a scale from 1-10. The fourth question has 6 six sub components each of which are scored with a scale of 1-10. For every scale, a score of 0 indicates no fatigue/interference where a score of 10 indicates as bad as you can imagine. A patient's score can range from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates the best outcome and 100 indicates the worst.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study treatment in Cycle 1 [cycle length = 21 for NKTR-102 or 28 days for TPC] and end of Cycle 44
Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Assessed by ESMO-MCBS Derived From Overall Survival
The magnitude of clinical benefit of NKTR-102 is assessed by the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) (v1.0). The scale is graded 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, where grades 5 and 4 represent a high level of proven clinical benefit, and grade 1 represents no clinical benefit. To determine the magnitude of clinical benefit when the median OS with the standard of treatment is ≤ 1 year, the score is derived from the Hazard Ratio (HR) of Overall Survival, overall survival gain, and QoL improvement between two treatment arms. Values reported in the data table are Overall Survival values.
Time frame: Through study completion, within 3 years from study start
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.3
The number of participants with adverse events as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.3
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Investigator Site - West Palm Beach
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Investigator Site - Athens
Athens, Georgia, United States
Investigator Site - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Investigator Site - Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Investigator Site - Minneapolis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
...and 46 more locations