The EMINENT study is a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the effectiveness of the ELUVIA stent versus Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents in the treatment of lesions in the femoropopliteal arteries.
The EMINENT study is a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the effectiveness of the ELUVIA stent versus Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents in the treatment of lesions 30-210 mm long located in the femoropopliteal arteries in subjects with symptoms classified as Rutherford categories 2-4. The study is a 2:1 randomized (ELUVIA vs Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents), controlled, single-blind, superiority trial (RCT). The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the ELUVIA Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System (ELUVIA Stent) for treating Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA) lesions up to 210 mm in length when compared against bare metal stents, and collect additional data including health economics data.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
775
stent implantation during the index procedure
Number of Subjects With Primary Patency at 12 Months Post-procedure
The primary effectiveness endpoint assesses primary patency at 12 months post-procedure. This effectiveness endpoint is designed to demonstrate that the 12-month primary patency for the ELUVIA treatment group is superior to the Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents treatment group.
Time frame: 12 Months
Number of Subjects Walking Improvement - Distance at Baseline to 12 Months
Walking Improvement will be assessed and compared between the 2 study arms, by evaluating the change in Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) / treadmill test from baseline, or preceding any Target Vessel Revascularization and evaluating change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) from baseline. Values are represented as a mean and standard deviation and reflect the change in meters walked.
Time frame: 12 Months
Number of Subjects Change in Quality of Life - Improvement From Baseline to 12 Month
The change in quality of life will be assessed and compared between the 2 study arms, by evaluating change in EuroQol (EQ) - 5 Dimensions (5D) - 5 Levels (5L) questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L™) from baseline, or preceding any Target Vessel Revascularization Values are presented as a count of subjects at 12-months and by the number of subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 12 Months
Cost Effectiveness
Cost effectiveness of ELUVIA™ drug-eluting stent versus bare metal self-expanding nitinol stents.
Time frame: during index procedure, 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Number of Subjects With Clinical Improvement at 12-months
Clinical improvement will be evaluated by assessing the changes in Rutherford Classification from baseline. Values are presented as a count of participants at 12-months by the number of participants analyzed. Rutherford Classification describes 7 categories of peripheral artery disease, including both the patient's clinical symptoms as well as objective findings; Primary sustained clinical improvement, is a rate of improvement in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline without the need for repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR); Secondary sustained clinical improvement is a rate of improvement in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline including those subjects with repeat TLR; Clinical deterioration, is the rate of downgrade in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
LKH Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria
Klinikum Klagenfurt
Klagenfurt, Austria
Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien
Vienna, Austria
OLV Aalst
Aalst, Belgium
ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen
Antwerp, Belgium
Imelda Hospital
Bonheiden, Belgium
AZ Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, Belgium
UZ Antwerpen
Edegem, Belgium
UZ Gent
Ghent, Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
...and 50 more locations
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Subjects With Hemodynamic Improvement at 12-months
Hemodynamic improvement was evaluated by assessing the number of participants that demonstrated an increase in the Ankle-Brachial Index value of \>/= 0.10 or an increase in the overall ABI value to \>/= 0.90 from baseline to 12 months
Time frame: 12 months